"The most valuable feature is the flexibility of the searching elements of the metadata."
"Most of our customers are very fond of the upgraded smart user interface."
"It's a very good solution."
"I think the presentation layer could be improved - currently, it's too complex, and there are too many features cluttered all over the screen."
"Pricing could be improved and the stability or the performance needs improvement, which is very important."
"The architecture needs improvement, as it's complex."
More OpenText Content Suite Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Alfresco is ranked 10th in Enterprise Content Management with 1 review while OpenText Content Suite Platform is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews. Alfresco is rated 6.0, while OpenText Content Suite Platform is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Alfresco writes "Flexible and customizable but lacking integration with Microsoft". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Content Suite Platform writes "Scalable, verifies complex solutions, and the support we receive is good". Alfresco is most compared with SharePoint, Hyland OnBase, IBM FileNet, Nuxeo and OpenText Documentum, whereas OpenText Content Suite Platform is most compared with OpenText Documentum, IBM FileNet, SharePoint, Hyland OnBase and Box.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.