OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 7.7% |
| Tricentis Tosca | 15.7% |
| BrowserStack | 8.8% |
| Other | 67.8% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Functional Testing Tools | Dec 29, 2025 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Dec 29, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca | Dec 29, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud | Dec 29, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Functional Testing vs BrowserStack | Dec 29, 2025 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tricentis Tosca | 4.1 | 15.7% | 96% | 113 interviewsAdd to research |
| Katalon Studio | 4.0 | N/A | 91% | 55 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 60 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 474 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 176 |
| Large Enterprise | 934 |
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
OpenText Functional Testing was previously known as Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro.
Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, and
TMNA Services
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| QA Automation Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I use OpenText UFT One for automating web, desktop, and Oracle ERP applications. It offers easy object identification and supports various applications. However, it needs less coding and better support. It's more efficient than Selenium, saving development time. |
| Sr. Quality Assurance Project Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees | 4.5 | I find OpenText Functional Testing highly versatile and cost-effective, enabling both business users and engineers to create flexible tests, though support could be improved; overall, it scales well, simplifies scripting, and earns a strong nine out of ten. |
| Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | No summary available |
| QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees | 3.0 | We migrated tests from OpenText UFT One to SOAtest due to stability issues caused by browser dependency and memory consumption leading to crashes. While UFT One streamlined repetitive tasks, it required VBScript knowledge, which was limiting. |
| Senior Manager at Deloitte | 3.5 | We use OpenText UFT One for archiving from SAP and vendor invoice management. It's the best solution for large customers, providing great ROI in up to three years. However, the user interface could be improved for better usability. |
| Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees | 4.5 | I use OpenText UFT One for testing web, desktop, and mobile applications, valuing its object repository and AI capabilities. While it improves the QA process, it could enhance report exports and support behavior-driven development. |
| QA automation Architect Manager at BMO Financial | 4.0 | We use OpenText UFT One for automating end-to-end flows in web applications, incorporating backend and UI validations. Its support for multiple technologies and ease of coding are valuable, though its performance could be improved as it sometimes becomes heavy. |
| Manager, Technical Services Owner at Insignia | 3.5 | OpenText UFT One is used in our company to manage testing, but it poses a learning challenge for developers. We are considering alternatives like Tosca during our migration process, aiming for tool standardization while maintaining automation and regression benefits. |
