OpenText Software Delivery Management provides application lifecycle management with Agile and Waterfall support. It features intuitive interfaces, CI/CD integration, automated testing, and robust reporting, improving project management efficiency and usability.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Software Delivery Management | 4.5% |
| Jira | 14.7% |
| Microsoft Azure DevOps | 10.8% |
| Other | 70.0% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites | Dec 29, 2025 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Dec 29, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Jira | Dec 29, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Microsoft Azure DevOps | Dec 29, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) | Dec 29, 2025 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitLab | 4.2 | N/A | 97% | 88 interviewsAdd to research |
| Microsoft Azure DevOps | 4.1 | 10.8% | 95% | 136 interviewsAdd to research |
OpenText Software Delivery Management offers responsive support, engaging with customers at multiple levels, including R&D. Users appreciate direct communication and quick resolutions. Despite occasional delays with certain features and follow-up, many value interactions with knowledgeable teams. While some report slow escalation, others enjoy premium assistance and adaptability to custom needs. Enhanced online help and engagement have surprised some users pleasantly. Suggestions include improving flexibility and coordination among support teams for seamless service delivery.
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 113 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 67 |
| Large Enterprise | 414 |
Designed to enhance teams' productivity and streamline processes, OpenText Software Delivery Management integrates seamlessly with Agile methodologies. Its comprehensive backlog and requirements management, user stories, and test management make it a complete tool for managing the development lifecycle. The platform aligns with DevOps, providing traceability and extensive customization options. Traceability from requirements to deployments is enhanced, making it easier for teams to track progress. It offers integration with popular tools like Jenkins and JIRA, ensuring a unified approach to continuous delivery and testing management.
What key features does OpenText Software Delivery Management include?OpenText Software Delivery Management is implemented across technology-focused industries, supporting Agile processes like requirements management and defect tracking. Organizations use it to standardize development workflows and optimize continuous delivery integration, choosing it for its ability to support both Agile and Waterfall methodologies within application lifecycle management.
OpenText Software Delivery Management was previously known as Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane.
Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Senior Test Automation Specialist at APG | 4.0 | We use OpenText ALM Octane as a Quality Hub in our development cycle, benefiting from its efficient audit features. While it saves us significant time and money, flexibility and support could improve further for specific organizational needs. |
| Operational Manager at LMI | 5.0 | I have used OpenText ALM Octane in developing a training information system at my company. The tool's high price is a drawback. Previously, we used Micro Focus but switched due to dissatisfaction with test scripts and output format. |
| Principal at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees | 3.0 | I primarily use Micro Focus ALM Octane for test management, tracing defects back to requirements. It excels in managing the software testing lifecycle but needs improvements in DevOps integration. Competing tools include QA Testing Tools from Tricentis and Rally by Broadcom. |
| QA Engineer at Amadeus | 3.0 | I use OpenText ALM Octane for integrating Jenkins automation jobs and documenting test cases. Its test reporting and traceability are valuable. Unlike Rally, Octane offers user-friendly UI, efficient project management, and better integration capabilities, benefiting our organization. |
| Managing Partner at Georg Nauerz Consulting | 4.0 | My company uses OpenText ALM Octane for various purposes, including sprint planning and test management. Its one-tool solution is valuable, though release management needs improvement. We switched from Microsoft for its unified capabilities, despite some issues with metrics and dashboards. |
| Automation Architect at Capgemini | 4.0 | I use Micro Focus ALM Octane for agile purposes and its integration with ALM. The customizable reports are its most valuable feature, though it could benefit from adding scrum board-like functionality. Previously, I used Jira. |
| Process Owner E/E Test Management at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | No summary available |
| Executive Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | My team uses OpenText ALM Octane primarily for test management, valuing its capabilities in handling test scenarios and automation. However, integration with other SDLC tools could be easier, as it's currently time-consuming and challenging. |
