Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs PTC Integrity comparison

OpenText and PTC are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. OpenText is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3, while PTC is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.7. OpenText holds a 5.0% mindshare in ALM, compared to PTC’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 68% of PTC users who would recommend it.
OpenText Software Delivery ...
Read 41 OpenText Software Delivery Management reviews
  • 3,308 Views
  • 3,176 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
PTC Integrity
Read 13 PTC Integrity reviews
  • 1,744 Views
  • 1,744 Comparison Views
68% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

PTC Integrity and OpenText Software Delivery Management compete in software development management. OpenText is seen as superior due to its extensive features justifying its cost.

Features: PTC Integrity offers comprehensive change management, seamless integration with existing tools, and robust traceability from requirements through to project completion. OpenText Software Delivery Management provides end-to-end traceability, Agile project management, and comprehensive ALM capabilities including requirements and test management.

Room for Improvement: PTC Integrity could enhance its flexibility and user interface for a smoother user experience. It also benefits from more customization options and improved API integrations. OpenText Software Delivery Management could improve its initial setup complexity, licensing clarity, and provide better support for non-Agile processes to broaden its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText provides flexible deployment options including cloud-based and on-premise solutions, coupled with responsive support. PTC Integrity offers a traditional deployment model but with reliable customer service, though they might benefit from offering more deployment flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: PTC Integrity offers competitive pricing with a strong initial ROI due to lower setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. OpenText Software Delivery Management, while more expensive at first, is argued to deliver greater long-term ROI by improving efficiency and streamlining processes.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. PTC Integrity Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. PTC Integrity
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Software Delivery ...
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
41
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (8th)
PTC Integrity
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
12th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText Software Delivery Management is 5.0%, down from 5.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PTC Integrity is 4.3%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Software Delivery Management5.0%
PTC Integrity4.3%
Other90.7%
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
 

Featured Reviews

GeorgNauerz - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable tool for sprint planning, test management, quality management, and automated testing
I think the area of release management in the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required. In general, the connection between releases and scrum teams needs improvement, as it could be optimized owing to its linkages, making it very uncomfortable as soon as you have strong teams or scrum teams that work with different items over several releases. In future product releases, the solution needs to focus a bit more on the metric part. The product's dashboard is a metric for productivity and process control.
Read full review
Neha Wanjari - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps to create tasks, change requests and documentation
I personally like PTC Integrity because it provides everything within the software. You can store and access your data and perform various tasks. Compared to other products, I find it user-friendly, which can sometimes feel complex. I think PTC Integrity is user-friendly, making it nice to use. The tool is easier to learn. The tool has a dashboard that details our projects and products, including the number of tasks, change requests, and their statuses (incomplete or complete). Having all this data within the solution makes collaborating easy for our project team. Unlike using multiple tools, having everything we need in one software platform is convenient. I rate the tool's user experience and interface a nine point five out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most useful feature of Micro Focus ALM Octane is the dashboards, they are easy to use."
"It's brought our entire team into a single tool. We're all looking at the same real-time data. Our project management office has been able to set up dashboards for individual teams, and do comparisons by teams, of integration, and cross-team integration, burn-up, burn-down, and cumulative flow..."
"It is a very scalable solution."
"We like Micro Focus ALM Octane because its performance is okay, and its stability is okay, so we use it a lot. The platform is easy to use."
"We looked at all the market-leading tools, but we did not find anything quite as comprehensive as ALM Octane. When I say comprehensive, it's not just a single tool for Agile planning, backlog management release, sprint planning, etc., but it also has a built-in, comprehensive quality management module. It also has pipelines where we can hook up with our DevOps ecosystem/toolchain."
"Octane works well with the Jira portfolio to track the project with two methods: Agile and Waterfall. We can track all the testing in Waterfall or Agile and synchronize it with Agile tools."
"The solution natively supports Agile-Waterfall hybrid software development at an enterprise scale. This is very important to us. Because even though the company wishes to go Agile, we still have projects which follow a Waterfall methodology. In order for us to accommodate both, we needed some sort of hybrid system. Because if we are using a fully Agile system, then the reporting might not be correctly extracted."
"Micro Focus' technical support is good."
More OpenText Software Delivery Management pros
"PTC Integrity has good stability."
"The tool is quite structured and has a good command set."
"I personally like PTC Integrity because it provides everything within the software. You can store and access your data and perform various tasks. Compared to other products, I find it user-friendly, which can sometimes feel complex. I think PTC Integrity is user-friendly, making it nice to use. The tool is easier to learn."
"Complete traceability as per process requirements."
"The most valuable feature of PTC Integrity is its integration with our existing PTC tools, especially for drawing release activities."
"We found the requirement management and the version control features to be the most useful for our client."
"We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information."
"The solution is flexible in terms of customization. You can bend and reformat it in many ways. You can also customize the APIs and public functions."
More PTC Integrity pros
 

Cons

"Octane, from an administration perspective, is very limited. The application is improving with each release but what is missing is the ability to manage users and workspaces. I would also like "usable" reporting for more than a few workspaces. Also still missing is the ability to copy a workspace or get data in or out, except for limited REST calls."
"The product's requirements management feature needs enhancement in terms of functionality."
"Though Micro Focus ALM Octane doesn't have much of a bug, it lacks integration with some solutions. For example, my company has fairly new software, but it can't be integrated with Micro Focus ALM Octane, so integration with other software, particularly with less popular software, could be improved. Micro Focus ALM Octane also requires a lot of resources during its setup, and I find this another area for improvement. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of Micro Focus ALM Octane is the ability to customize the interface, especially when doing a manual test."
"Technical support can be slow."
"The solution should improve by adding scrum board-like functionality."
"The reporting needs to be improved and allow for customization. I want to build my own widgets, but I don't want to use the ones already in the system. I want to build mine from scratch."
"Also, while there is a Requirements Module in Octane, it is very plain. It's okay to have some requirements described there, but it's not really following the whole BDD approach. I would like to have more features for requirements in there."
"Development of extensions or connections to GitHub actions could be better. Better integration with Azure DevOps would also help."
More OpenText Software Delivery Management cons
"For complex businesses, the internal templates could have more flexibility and compatibility."
"We are unhappy because everything that we needed required customization and this is not a plug-and-play type of solution at all."
"It's not so customizable. Compared to other tools, defining user stories is a slightly more cumbersome process as an ALM engineer."
"To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue."
"There are not enough reports. People would like to see something similar to what is available in JIRA."
"The tool's web-based UI needs improvement. Some functionalities don't work yet, and querying items is slow. Also, it's not in the cloud yet. I don't know if they'll do it in the future because they already have core agreements with customers. If they offer these functionalities, customers will likely buy their product."
"It's not easy to plan on this solution and it's not user-friendly. The interface should be more like a web interface. It's not easy to use."
"I would like to see better integration from the architectural side."
More PTC Integrity cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution has reduced our testing costs."
"If you compare the price with the functionality, it is pretty much the same as other solutions. If you compare it to Jira, for instance, it has a lot more functionality. You don't need any plug-ins, but it's also more expensive. Once you start adding your different plug-ins to Jira, you'll probably end up with the same amount or more. There is also a yearly support cost, which is usually 25% of the initial cost of the license."
"For what it does, it's very reasonably priced. I like the licensing model as well, because it's very flexible. You can scale licenses up and down for short periods of time."
"In my opinion, it's good value for the price that you pay."
"I would say that it is an affordable product. There is an annual service fee, which is one of the additional payments to be made apart from the standard licensing costs attached to the solution."
"Pricing is the weakest point. It is expensive, but the tool has plenty of features. The main problem we have is that the pricing is very high compared to some other solutions."
"The price of Micro Focus ALM Octane is too high compared to other solutions."
"The product is highly priced compared to other tools."
More OpenText Software Delivery Management pricing and cost advice
"The product is expensive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
24%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
27%
Computer Software Company
15%
Healthcare Company
8%
Transportation Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise32
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise12
 

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?
Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...
See all answers
What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Octane?
The platform's most valuable feature is pipeline integration or continuous integration services.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Octane?
OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product. However, it offsets costs by saving time and money, thus creating a balance between expenses and benefits. Our organization with over 1500 users sees sa...
See all answers
What do you like most about PTC Integrity?
I have found that previously, the OEM sector was managing everything, possibly manually. However, with the introduction of the product, it has become much easier for customers to handle their produ...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PTC Integrity?
PTC Integrity is expensive, but it is cheaper compared to IBM Rational. The comparative affordability in pricing is an advantage.
See all answers
What needs improvement with PTC Integrity?
The user-friendliness of PTC Integrity can be improved. The interface is not intuitive for first-time users and takes time to get accustomed to. A more straightforward and intuitive interface would...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Jira vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Jira vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 39% of the time
OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 25% of the time
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 7% of the time
Rally Software vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Rally Software vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 6% of the time
TFS vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
TFS vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 4% of the time
More OpenText Software Delivery Management Competitors
Codebeamer vs PTC Integrity Logo
Codebeamer vs PTC Integrity
Compared 57% of the time
Polarion ALM vs PTC Integrity Logo
Polarion ALM vs PTC Integrity
Compared 12% of the time
Jira vs PTC Integrity Logo
Jira vs PTC Integrity
Compared 10% of the time
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs PTC Integrity Logo
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs PTC Integrity
Compared 7% of the time
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PTC Integrity Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PTC Integrity
Compared 4% of the time
More PTC Integrity Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText Software Delivery Management
September 2025
OpenText Software Delivery Management reportDownload OpenText Software Delivery Management product report
Buyer's Guide
PTC Integrity
September 2025
PTC Integrity reportDownload PTC Integrity product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane
MKS
 

Overview

OpenText Software Delivery Management provides application lifecycle management with Agile and Waterfall support. It features intuitive interfaces, CI/CD integration, automated testing, and robust reporting, improving project management efficiency and usability.

Designed to enhance teams' productivity and streamline processes, OpenText Software Delivery Management integrates seamlessly with Agile methodologies. Its comprehensive backlog and requirements management, user stories, and test management make it a complete tool for managing the development lifecycle. The platform aligns with DevOps, providing traceability and extensive customization options. Traceability from requirements to deployments is enhanced, making it easier for teams to track progress. It offers integration with popular tools like Jenkins and JIRA, ensuring a unified approach to continuous delivery and testing management.

What key features does OpenText Software Delivery Management include?
  • Versatile across browsers with consistent performance.
  • Seamless CI/CD integration for smooth development processes.
  • Intuitive interface aiding in efficiency and ease of use.
  • Comprehensive backlog management ensures organized prioritization.
  • Automated testing aligns with Agile and DevOps principles.
What benefits can users expect when evaluating OpenText Software Delivery Management?
  • Enhanced traceability from inception to delivery.
  • Improved project management efficiency through streamlined processes.
  • Robust reporting capabilities offering detailed insights.
  • Increased flexibility in customization enabling tailored experiences.
  • Predictive analytics for better decision-making.

OpenText Software Delivery Management is implemented across technology-focused industries, supporting Agile processes like requirements management and defect tracking. Organizations use it to standardize development workflows and optimize continuous delivery integration, choosing it for its ability to support both Agile and Waterfall methodologies within application lifecycle management.

OpenText
The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products.
PTC
 

Sample Customers

Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology
TRW Automotive
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. PTC Integrity
September 2025
Free Report: OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. PTC Integrity
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. PTC Integrity and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. PTC Integrity report.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.