Codebeamer and OpenText Software Delivery Management compete in the software delivery management category. Codebeamer's full traceability and cloud migration abilities give it an upper hand in industries requiring strict compliance, while OpenText’s strong CI/CD integration and Agile capabilities set it apart.
Features: Codebeamer provides full traceability, collaboration tools, and customization options valuable for automotive and pharmaceutical industries. Its ability to migrate data with minimal downtime is significant. OpenText offers robust out-of-the-box integrations, Agile functionalities, and comprehensive quality management modules. Users also value its ease of customization without extensive coding.
Room for Improvement: Codebeamer should enhance its user interface design, improve integration with Jira, and develop more industry-specific features. It struggles with compatibility with older PDM systems and role-specific customizations. OpenText needs improvements in reporting flexibility, user management, and integration with newer tools. Enhancements in test automation and mobile compatibility are also needed.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Codebeamer supports on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments, offering satisfactory technical support but needs more transparency and language options. OpenText, known for its transparent support processes, receives favorable feedback as customer input influences product development.
Pricing and ROI: Codebeamer is moderately priced with pre-built modules, offering significant administrative savings. OpenText’s higher cost is offset by comprehensive features and flexible license sharing, providing a good ROI when fully utilized in enterprise environments.
ROI can manifest through cost savings and increased development speed.
The solution has produced a return on investment.
Codebeamer saves time and money for certain use cases, such as AUTOSPICE implementations.
The ability to generate audit evidence with a single click saves ten days of work for ten people, enabling them to focus on other tasks.
If I raise an issue as high priority, I receive responses in six to eight hours.
For out-of-the-box support, the customer service from PTC is satisfactory.
In a project, I have experienced up to 180 licenses running during peak times and as low as ten licenses during downtime without facing upgrade or downgrade issues.
It should come with documentation that is accessible for users, especially for newcomers who might not have any prior knowledge.
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate the scalability of Codebeamer as eight or nine because it is a highly scalable solution.
We can expand the number of servers and resources as required.
From a scale of one to ten, I would rate the stability of Codebeamer as eight to nine because the solution is highly stable.
Running it independently or with a bigger server generally doesn't cause any issues.
There were stability issues due to version compatibility.
There should be more integration tools available.
Older versions of PDM Windchill face compatibility issues with newer versions of Codebeamer, requiring users to downgrade Codebeamer to establish integration.
If terminology changes, modifications must be done manually or by exporting the document to Word or Excel, which is time-consuming.
While it aims to be as flexible as possible for a large enterprise application, sometimes there are limitations that may not meet specific organizational needs.
Codebeamer is on the expensive side, but it provides ready-made modules for standards like ASPICE and ISO 26262, which might justify the cost for customers looking for those solutions.
Codebeamer is fairly priced against competition.
OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product.
Its integration capability is very high, with almost eighty to eighty-five percent of integrations available readily out of the box, minimizing the need for specific integration-related work.
Codebeamer saves on time and resources with its web-based client, eliminating the need to install it on every system.
The requirements management aspect of Codebeamer is critical because it helps various industries, such as automotive or medical devices, to capture requirements based on industry-specific standards and processes.
Its ability to generate audit evidence with a single click is a significant advantage, as it saves considerable time and money compared to manual processes.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Codebeamer | 8.9% |
| OpenText Software Delivery Management | 5.1% |
| Other | 86.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 32 |
codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.
OpenText Software Delivery Management provides application lifecycle management with Agile and Waterfall support. It features intuitive interfaces, CI/CD integration, automated testing, and robust reporting, improving project management efficiency and usability.
Designed to enhance teams' productivity and streamline processes, OpenText Software Delivery Management integrates seamlessly with Agile methodologies. Its comprehensive backlog and requirements management, user stories, and test management make it a complete tool for managing the development lifecycle. The platform aligns with DevOps, providing traceability and extensive customization options. Traceability from requirements to deployments is enhanced, making it easier for teams to track progress. It offers integration with popular tools like Jenkins and JIRA, ensuring a unified approach to continuous delivery and testing management.
What key features does OpenText Software Delivery Management include?OpenText Software Delivery Management is implemented across technology-focused industries, supporting Agile processes like requirements management and defect tracking. Organizations use it to standardize development workflows and optimize continuous delivery integration, choosing it for its ability to support both Agile and Waterfall methodologies within application lifecycle management.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
