Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Rally Software comparison

OpenText and Broadcom are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. OpenText is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3, while Broadcom is ranked #10 with an average rating of 6.8. OpenText holds a 6.0% mindshare in ALM, compared to Broadcom’s 6.6% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
OpenText Software Delivery ...
Read 41 OpenText Software Delivery Management reviews
  • 3,963 Views
  • 2,200 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
Rally Software
Read 119 Rally Software reviews
  • 5,237 Views
  • 2,302 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Rally Software and OpenText Software Delivery Management are key players in the Agile and DevOps software market. Rally Software seems to have the upper hand due to its more user-friendly interface and effective tool integration that aids in agile practices.

Features: Rally Software is known for its intuitive usability and seamless integration with JIRA and ALM, supporting large-scale team coordination. It offers comprehensive reporting, supporting both scrum and Kanban, though it's more scrum-oriented. On the other hand, OpenText Software Delivery Management stands out with its complete lifecycle management integrations, providing a wide range of functionalities that offer robust traceability and end-to-end project visibility.

Room for Improvement: Rally Software users seek enhanced portfolio management with better integration with other systems, improvements in Kanban functionalities, better defect management, and real-time data analytics. OpenText Software Delivery Management is noted to need better customization flexibility, improved integration with third-party tools, and more user-friendly interfaces with streamlined workflows.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rally Software offers a flexible deployment model across public, hybrid, and private clouds, with highly praised customer service for its responsive support and personalized assistance. OpenText Software Delivery Management primarily offers on-premises deployment, catering to data residency and compliance needs, with detailed customer support that can be slower due to complex queries.

Pricing and ROI: Rally Software's scalability and moderate user-based licensing fees make it cost-effective, particularly for larger implementations, showing strong ROI in testing efficiency and project management. OpenText Software Delivery Management is higher priced, offering significant value for large enterprises that need comprehensive lifecycle management, with its advanced capabilities justifying the cost for such organizations.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. Rally Software Report (Updated: May 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. Rally Software
May 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 857,688 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.9
OpenText Software Delivery Management promises cost efficiency, reduced resource needs, and enhanced project management with automation and predictive analytics.
Sentiment score
7.9
Rally Software improves efficiency and ROI, simplifies processes, offers valuable insights, and outperforms Quality Center in cost-effectiveness.
The ability to generate audit evidence with a single click saves ten days of work for ten people, enabling them to focus on other tasks.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Software Delivery Management report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Rally Software report
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.4
OpenText Software Delivery Management provides efficient support with active customer engagement, though some users desire faster communication improvements.
Sentiment score
6.9
Rally Software's customer service is knowledgeable and responsive, but response times can be slower for complex issues.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
OpenText Software Delivery Management is scalable and efficient, supporting large teams and numerous users with minimal performance issues.
Sentiment score
7.2
Rally Software is known for scalability and agile integration, with minor slow-downs but no major data handling issues.
We can expand the number of servers and resources as required.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Software Delivery Management report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Rally Software report
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
OpenText Software Delivery Management is praised for its stability, reliable functionality, supportive services, and high user satisfaction scores.
Sentiment score
7.3
Rally Software is stable with reliable uptime, but users face occasional performance issues, needing improvement in reporting and speed.
 

Room For Improvement

OpenText Software Delivery Management needs testing and integration enhancements, better usability, performance, and flexible features for improved functionality.
Users seek improved navigation, performance, reporting, Kanban support, integration, and customization in Rally Software for better user satisfaction.
While it aims to be as flexible as possible for a large enterprise application, sometimes there are limitations that may not meet specific organizational needs.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Software Delivery Management report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Rally Software report
 

Setup Cost

OpenText Software Delivery Management is costly but offers comprehensive features and scalability, potentially offsetting its high initial price.
Rally Software is costly compared to competitors, but offers value for agile scaling and negotiable professional services for large users.
 

Valuable Features

OpenText Software Delivery Management excels in Agile support, integrations, traceability, analytics, and adaptability for streamlined project management.
Its ability to generate audit evidence with a single click is a significant advantage, as it saves considerable time and money compared to manual processes.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Software Delivery Management report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Rally Software report
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Software Delivery ...
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
7th
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
41
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Rally Software
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
10th
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
119
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText Software Delivery Management is 6.0%, up from 5.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rally Software is 6.6%, up from 6.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
 

Featured Reviews

GeorgNauerz - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable tool for sprint planning, test management, quality management, and automated testing
I think the area of release management in the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required. In general, the connection between releases and scrum teams needs improvement, as it could be optimized owing to its linkages, making it very uncomfortable as soon as you have strong teams or scrum teams that work with different items over several releases. In future product releases, the solution needs to focus a bit more on the metric part. The product's dashboard is a metric for productivity and process control.
Read full review
Deep Maini - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps you collaborate on various effects and solutions from the top to the bottom of the organization
We use Rally Software extensively in our agile development processes. We have program boards set up where we write and break down stories. We assign story points and map dependencies between different stories, showing how stories from one team may depend on stories from another team. It integrates these functions well, especially compared to Jira, which has some limitations in this area. The tool keeps improving based on how teams actually work in Scaled Agile, continually upgrading their software versions to meet our needs. I find the whole Rally Software tool integrated very nicely. In Jira, we often go to Confluence for documentation using two separate tools. But in the product, it's not like that. The documentation is tightly integrated. I don't feel like switching to another tool, like going from Jira to Confluence. The tool is designed for collaboration. It shows your organization's view, showing different teams and verticals. It helps you collaborate on various effects and solutions from the top to the bottom of the organization. It has an ecosystem that supports this. All the dependencies between different teams can be easily mapped in Rally Software. They have a program board for that purpose.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
857,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
25%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
8%
Educational Organization
58%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Insurance Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?
Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...
See all answers
What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Octane?
The platform's most valuable feature is pipeline integration or continuous integration services.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Octane?
OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product. However, it offsets costs by saving time and money, thus creating a balance between expenses and benefits. Our organization with over 1500 users sees sa...
See all answers
What do you like most about Rally Software?
Rally offers many features that help the management of activities, coordination, alignment and reports, which applies agility across the organization. If I were to highlight a particular feature, i...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rally Software?
I don't know the exact pricing, but I think the tool is priced high. They provide quality workmanship, good software, regular upgrades, and they're always attentive and listen to users. Everything ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Rally Software?
The product itself seems to have a lot of bugs. One issue is that it sometimes allows people to modify data inappropriately. For example, team members can change numbers at will. While we have a me...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Jira vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Jira vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 47% of the time
OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 26% of the time
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 8% of the time
TFS vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
TFS vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 3% of the time
Atlassian ALM vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Atlassian ALM vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 2% of the time
More OpenText Software Delivery Management Competitors
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Rally Software Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Rally Software
Compared 33% of the time
Jira vs Rally Software Logo
Jira vs Rally Software
Compared 32% of the time
TFS vs Rally Software Logo
TFS vs Rally Software
Compared 6% of the time
OpenText Application Quality Management vs Rally Software Logo
OpenText Application Quality Management vs Rally Software
Compared 5% of the time
Polarion ALM vs Rally Software Logo
Polarion ALM vs Rally Software
Compared 3% of the time
More Rally Software Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText Software Delivery Management
May 2025
OpenText Software Delivery Management reportDownload OpenText Software Delivery Management product report
Buyer's Guide
Rally Software
May 2025
Rally Software reportDownload Rally Software product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane
CA Agile Central, Rally Enterprise, CA Agile Training, CA Agile Coaching, CA Agile Academy, CA Agile Management , CA ALM
 

Overview

OpenText Software Delivery Management provides application lifecycle management with Agile and Waterfall support. It features intuitive interfaces, CI/CD integration, automated testing, and robust reporting, improving project management efficiency and usability.

Designed to enhance teams' productivity and streamline processes, OpenText Software Delivery Management integrates seamlessly with Agile methodologies. Its comprehensive backlog and requirements management, user stories, and test management make it a complete tool for managing the development lifecycle. The platform aligns with DevOps, providing traceability and extensive customization options. Traceability from requirements to deployments is enhanced, making it easier for teams to track progress. It offers integration with popular tools like Jenkins and JIRA, ensuring a unified approach to continuous delivery and testing management.

What key features does OpenText Software Delivery Management include?
  • Versatile across browsers with consistent performance.
  • Seamless CI/CD integration for smooth development processes.
  • Intuitive interface aiding in efficiency and ease of use.
  • Comprehensive backlog management ensures organized prioritization.
  • Automated testing aligns with Agile and DevOps principles.
What benefits can users expect when evaluating OpenText Software Delivery Management?
  • Enhanced traceability from inception to delivery.
  • Improved project management efficiency through streamlined processes.
  • Robust reporting capabilities offering detailed insights.
  • Increased flexibility in customization enabling tailored experiences.
  • Predictive analytics for better decision-making.

OpenText Software Delivery Management is implemented across technology-focused industries, supporting Agile processes like requirements management and defect tracking. Organizations use it to standardize development workflows and optimize continuous delivery integration, choosing it for its ability to support both Agile and Waterfall methodologies within application lifecycle management.

OpenText

With Rally Software, you can plan, prioritize, manage, track, and continuously improve your work so that you can deliver the value that your customers need with speed, quality, and efficiency. Our enterprise-class Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) SaaS platform provides visibility into progress, roadblocks, and dependencies across multiple teams, projects, and programs. This allows you to align to your strategic goals and create better business results, and to do it all in a single system of record.

Broadcom
 

Sample Customers

Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology
Physicians Mutual, Harvard Pilgrim HealthCare, Editora Abril, Tata Communications, Level 3 Communications, Seagate, TomTom, Philips, Hiscox, Physicians Mutual, MYOB
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. Rally Software
May 2025
Free Report: OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. Rally Software
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. Rally Software and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
857,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. Rally Software report.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.