Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Microsoft Purview Information Protection Logo

Microsoft Purview Information Protection Reviews

Vendor: Microsoft
4.0 out of 5
Badge Leader

What is Microsoft Purview Information Protection?

Featured Microsoft Purview Information Protection reviews

Microsoft Purview Information Protection mindshare

As of December 2025, the mindshare of Microsoft Purview Information Protection in the Data Governance category stands at 2.5%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Governance Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Microsoft Purview Information Protection2.5%
Microsoft Purview Data Governance16.6%
Collibra Platform9.6%
Other71.3%
Data Governance

PeerResearch reports based on Microsoft Purview Information Protection reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryData GovernanceDec 31, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersDec 31, 2025Download
ComparisonMicrosoft Purview Information Protection vs Microsoft Purview Data GovernanceDec 31, 2025Download
ComparisonMicrosoft Purview Information Protection vs Collibra PlatformDec 31, 2025Download
ComparisonMicrosoft Purview Information Protection vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)Dec 31, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Microsoft Entra ID4.3N/A95%266 interviewsAdd to research
Microsoft Defender for Office 3654.2N/A96%60 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Nov 21, 2025

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise8
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business103
Midsize Enterprise71
Large Enterprise269
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Retailer
7%
Government
6%
Healthcare Company
5%
Educational Organization
4%
University
4%
Insurance Company
4%
Transportation Company
3%
Construction Company
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Legal Firm
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Media Company
1%
Non Tech Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
 
Microsoft Purview Information Protection Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Associate Director at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech4.0I utilize Microsoft Purview Information Protection for comprehensive data discovery, classification, and protection. It integrates seamlessly with existing tools, offering cost-effective solutions via an E5 license, though improvements in response time and structured data classification are needed.
Director Security Architecture at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees3.0I found Microsoft Purview Information Protection useful for easy DLP configuration and data protection, but it struggles with false positives and inconsistent policy enforcement. It meets security objectives but lacks ROI benefits and needs improvement in accuracy and compatibility.
Mgr Data Engineering at Avanade3.5I initially used Microsoft Purview Information Protection for Office 365 and later expanded to Azure SQL and Power BI. While beneficial for integration and ROI, the auto-classification and product communication need improvement. Microsoft's ecosystem integration influenced my choice over alternatives.
Client Experience Officer at 1234 Micro Technologies4.5I manage information protection for clients using Microsoft Purview, focusing on sensitivity labels and data loss prevention. While features and compliance are beneficial, better updates and broader data classification are needed to improve efficiency and protection across diverse file types.
Director, Network & Cloud Infrastructure at a legal firm with 501-1,000 employees4.0I use Microsoft Purview Information Protection mainly for sensitivity labeling, which simplifies policy enforcement, though limitations in AI classification, scalability, and occasional instability hinder efficiency; setup and licensing are also confusing, but overall, it integrates well within our Microsoft ecosystem.
Director, Network & Cloud Infrastructure at a legal firm with 501-1,000 employees4.0I've used Microsoft Purview Information Protection for sensitivity labeling, which applies policies automatically, though its AI-driven classification isn't precise enough. It's promising but unstable at times, hard to scale, and has confusing pricing and deployment processes.
Technical Services Manager, Cloud at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees3.5I've used Microsoft Purview Information Protection primarily for document labeling, appreciating its automated controls and integration with our tools, though AI classification and dictionary features need improvement; overall, it enhances our data security and compliance.
CEO at Blue Cycle4.0I use Microsoft Purview Information Protection to support Copilot readiness, valuing its broad sensitivity labeling and integration capabilities, though limited APIs hinder automation; overall, it's effective for securing data and enabling confident AI use in hybrid environments.