Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Reviews

Vendor: Microsoft
3.7 out of 5
Badge Leader
Leave a review

What is Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?

Azure Application Gateway is a web traffic load balancer that enables you to manage traffic to your web applications. Traditional load balancers operate at the transport layer (OSI layer 4 - TCP and UDP) and route traffic based on source IP address and port, to a destination IP address and port.

Get the Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Azure Front Door and more!
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is the #3 ranked solution in top Application Delivery Controllers and top Web Application Firewalls. PeerSpot users give Microsoft Azure Application Gateway an average rating of 7.4 out of 10. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is most commonly compared to Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks: Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 62% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 15% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
August 2025
Get the report
Helped 865,985 peers since 2012

Featured Microsoft Azure Application Gateway reviews

Read more reviews

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway mindshare

Product category:
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
As of August 2025, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category stands at 7.6%, down from 9.9% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway7.6%
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)15.7%
NetScaler14.4%
Other62.300000000000004%
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

PeerResearch reports based on Microsoft Azure Application Gateway reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Delivery Controllers (ADC)Aug 27, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonMicrosoft Azure Application Gateway vs NetScalerAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonMicrosoft Azure Application Gateway vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)Aug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonMicrosoft Azure Application Gateway vs HAProxyAug 27, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks4.2N/A98%111 interviewsAdd to research
Azure Front Door4.4N/A100%16 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway offers valuable features like Web Application Firewall, ease of integration, customization, and real-time autoscaling. Users appreciate traffic management, load balancing, and security orchestration through flexible rules. Its Layer 7 capabilities allow robust traffic control, while seamless integration with Azure services enhances deployment ease and performance. Effective in addressing security concerns, it offers SSL certificate handling and API integration, ensuring cost-efficiency and higher application availability for enterprises.
  • "Microsoft Azure Application Gateway impacts our cost savings while maintaining higher performance."
  • "Microsoft has a vast variety of tools, and it blends very well."
  • "Microsoft has a vast variety of tools, and it blends very well."

Room for Improvement

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway could improve its pricing model and enhance integration capabilities. Users desire better security features, flexible configuration, and a more intuitive user interface. The documentation is criticized for being insufficient and the service is considered complex to deploy. There's a need for improved scalability, more seamless protocol support, and a streamlined update process. The reporting and monitoring capabilities need refinement to address industry standards.
  • "In future releases of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, I would to see more AI functionalities and a better dashboard as well as some customizations."
  • "Customer service can be improved. There is room for improvement, specifically in paid support, by providing more direct contact."
  • "The user interface could be better."

ROI

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway provides significant cost savings, requiring fewer personnel for infrastructure maintenance as the vendor handles it, saving both time and money. Users report varied returns depending on projects, with experts able to offer precise cost analyses using the Azure calculator. Cost-saving and efficiency benefits include an approximate 40% saving by avoiding the need to build their own infrastructure. The service improves cost control with easy infrastructure setup and reduces expenses by 30 to 40%.

Pricing

Enterprise users find Microsoft Azure Application Gateway pricing to range from reasonable to expensive. The pay-as-you-go model offers flexibility without annual licensing fees. While some consider it cost-effective, especially within the Azure ecosystem, others note higher costs compared to competitors like AWS. Pricing varies based on usage, application size, data transfer, and scalability. Monthly billing is standard, and additional costs might include support and egress fees. Overall, the pricing often aligns with enterprise needs and budgets.
  • "The solution's pricing is not complex. It is not expensive from our point of view."
  • "The solution is fairly priced."
  • "The solution is reasonably priced."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations primarily use Microsoft Azure Application Gateway for securing internet-facing applications by applying Layer 7 firewall rules and hiding application logic. It supports traffic load balancing, protects against vulnerabilities, and facilitates secure connectivity for API and web applications. Users employ it for publishing, integrating, managing traffic, and offering redundancy. The tool enhances security compliance, serves internal and public URLs, and assists in system integrations, making it a crucial component in Microsoft Azure infrastructure.

Service and Support

Customers praise Microsoft Azure Application Gateway's customer service and support for their helpful and responsive approach, especially with technical issues. However, experiences vary; some find response times slow and expertise inconsistent. Outsourcing is noted, affecting consistency. Support quality is considered good but not exceptional, with some users relying on their expertise. Ratings range widely, with some finding service excellent and others suggesting areas for improvement, particularly in speed and effectiveness of resolutions.

Deployment

Many users find Microsoft Azure Application Gateway's initial setup straightforward and simple. Deployment typically takes between 20 minutes to a few hours. However, some users experience complexity, particularly with configuration aspects. Most can complete the process with a small team, though technical knowledge is recommended. Feedback varies from needing minimal assistance to using additional tools like Terraform for smooth deployment. Overall, experiences range from easy to moderately challenging, depending on expertise.

Scalability

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is regarded as highly scalable by many, with ease of expansion and automatic scaling capabilities noted. While some users report no issues with scaling, others express limitations, particularly with older versions. It integrates with various cloud platforms, proving effective for varied environments. Costs may increase with instance expansion. User feedback suggests positive scaling experiences, but some anticipate needing further adjustments for optimum performance under increased load.

Stability

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is generally reliable, with many users reporting it as stable. Most praise its reliable performance without facing bugs, glitches, or crashes. Stability ratings often range from seven to ten out of ten. While some users cited integration challenges or malicious request concerns, the tool is predominantly deemed dependable. Some continue evaluating its stability over time as they gain more experience and adapt it to their needs.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise18
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business364
Midsize Enterprise287
Large Enterprise1060
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
Insurance Company
6%
Healthcare Company
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
5%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Retailer
4%
Educational Organization
4%
University
3%
Media Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Construction Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Non Profit
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%

Compare Microsoft Azure Application Gateway with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway was previously known as Azure Application Gateway, MS Azure Application Gateway.

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway customers

Lilly, AccuWeather, AIRFRANCE, Honeywell

Related questions

  • 123
What's the difference between Azure Front Door and Application Gateway?
  • 36
How does AWS WAF compare to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?
  • 19
What are the pros and cons of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway for a large construction company?
  • 25
When evaluating Application Delivery Controllers, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 91
Comparison Between Kemp LoadMaster and Load Balancer.org
  • 50
Is Citrix ADC (formerly Netscaler) the best ADC to use and if not why?
  • 34
What are your daily F5 BIG-IP LTM use cases?
  • 47
Why do I need an ADC solution?
  • 52
What is the best ADC solution?
  • 15
Why is Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Azure Front Door vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
Azure Front Door vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
F5 Advanced WAF vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
F5 Advanced WAF vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
AWS WAF vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
AWS WAF vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Fortinet FortiWeb vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
NetScaler vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
NetScaler vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
HAProxy vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
HAProxy vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
NGINX Plus vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
NGINX Plus vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Imperva Web Application Firewall vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
Imperva Web Application Firewall vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Fortinet FortiADC vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
Fortinet FortiADC vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Imperva DDoS vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
Imperva DDoS vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Akamai App and API Protector vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
Akamai App and API Protector vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Azure Web Application Firewall vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
Azure Web Application Firewall vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
See all alternatives
 
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
IT Manager at Chong Hua Hospital4.5I primarily use Microsoft Azure Application Gateway for web applications, appreciating its autoscaling, cost savings, and security features. However, I desire more AI functions and a better dashboard. It helped reduce expenses by about 30-40%.
Information Security and Compliance Officer at Carnation3.5We use Microsoft Azure Application Gateway for internal application development, appreciating its integration with other solutions and security features like SSL. While the user interface needs improvement, it saves us time and costs, yielding around 40% ROI.
Technical Architect at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees5.0We use Microsoft Azure Application Gateway for managing multiple internal and public URLs with ease. The WAF features are valuable and easy to configure. However, wildcard and regular expression support for rules would enhance its flexibility and efficiency.
Advisor Cloud Master Architecture Azure AWS (USA, UK, Argentina) at Jorge Palaia4.0I rely on Microsoft Azure Application Gateway for integrating multiple applications with security and networking solutions. Its flexibility, scalability, and robust documentation enhance business outcomes, though it could improve service integration and application balancing. Azure outperforms competitors in Microsoft applications integration.
IT Manager at a construction company with 10,001+ employees3.5We use Microsoft Azure Application Gateway for building and publishing applications while benefiting from domain mapping and Azure web tools. Improvements are needed in security for certificate-based services and during upgrades from version one to version two.
IT Architect at Western Cape Government3.5I use Microsoft Azure Application Gateway to publish web applications. It's user-friendly, flexible, and effective in threat detection, though not scalable. It offers great value by reducing management needs, yet controlling infrastructure costs is crucial to avoid unexpected expenses.
Cyber Security Consultant at a retailer with 10,001+ employees4.5We use Microsoft Azure Application Gateway to publish services on Azure, though it lacks a built-in security policy. We appreciate its easy-to-configure rules but find the interface poor and updating slow, prompting many to consider Azure's Front Door.
Senior Network Engineer at Eyegear3.0Microsoft Azure Application Gateway effectively manages microservices and allows developers to test and assess web applications. The custom domain feature enhances user experience by offering memorable links, but the pricing could be improved. It integrates easily with other platforms.