No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo

Top 10 Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Alternatives

Vendor: Broadcom
4.0 out of 5
Leave a reviewWhy PeerSpot?

Top Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat protection, superior AI-driven malware detection, and comprehensive endpoint management, ensuring robust defense against evolving cyber threats and seamless integration for enterprise-level security solutions.

Broadcom Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Broadcom, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.4 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.4 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR offers advanced EDR features and a user-friendly dashboard, appealing to organizations needing comprehensive threat intelligence. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise provides robust anti-malware protection with competitive pricing, suiting businesses prioritizing strong baseline security with flexible licensing.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR has a higher setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, highlighting significant financial considerations for organizations when choosing between these two security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR has a higher setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, highlighting significant financial considerations for organizations when choosing between these two security solutions.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers seamless Microsoft integration and ease of use, ideal for those within the Microsoft ecosystem. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise excels in intrusion prevention across platforms, appealing to users seeking strong cross-platform protection despite possible complexity in setup.
Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers a relatively lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, making it a more cost-effective option for initial deployment.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers a relatively lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, making it a more cost-effective option for initial deployment.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint excels in behavior-based AI detection and real-time threat mitigation, ideal for complex IT environments. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers robust antivirus and anti-malware protection, making it suitable for enterprises focusing on comprehensive network security.
Download SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete typically incurs lower setup costs compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, highlighting its cost-effectiveness for initial deployment. Symantec offers a robust setup with potentially higher costs, emphasizing extensive security features.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete typically incurs lower setup costs compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, highlighting its cost-effectiveness for initial deployment. Symantec offers a robust setup with potentially higher costs, emphasizing extensive security features.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
Tanium offers strong pricing, agile deployment, and superior customer support. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise delivers a robust feature set with comprehensive malware protection. Tech buyers might choose Tanium for cost-effectiveness and speed, while others might prefer Symantec for its extensive security features.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise vs. Tanium Report
Tanium involves a significant upfront setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers a more moderate setup expense, highlighting the key cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Tanium involves a significant upfront setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers a more moderate setup expense, highlighting the key cost difference between the two solutions.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
4.0 out of 5
Trellix offers affordable endpoint security, emphasizing threat prevention with features like machine learning and strong access control. In comparison, Symantec excels in firewall management and intrusion prevention, integrating advanced AI and machine learning for robust malware protection, catering to varied enterprise needs with flexible licensing options.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a flexible setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise presents a more traditional pricing structure, highlighting distinct approaches in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a flexible setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise presents a more traditional pricing structure, highlighting distinct approaches in initial investment.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
HP Wolf Security offers affordable, efficient threat isolation and containment, along with straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise provides advanced threat intelligence and machine learning capabilities, appealing to enterprises needing feature-rich, comprehensive protection despite higher costs and occasional setup complexities.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
HP Wolf Security has a higher setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise. Users noted the differences in initial expenditure between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security has a higher setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise. Users noted the differences in initial expenditure between the two solutions.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in real-time threat detection and ease of deployment with competitive pricing. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers strong anti-malware protection and firewall management but is noted for higher costs, making it ideal for larger enterprises.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is known for more complex installation expenses. The difference in setup cost can influence businesses when choosing between these two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is known for more complex installation expenses. The difference in setup cost can influence businesses when choosing between these two solutions.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum
4.0 out of 5
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum is known for ease of use and centralized management, ideal for those seeking straightforward administration. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise appeals with advanced AI-driven threat detection and hybrid environment flexibility, suiting enterprises needing cutting-edge protection.
Download Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum offers a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, highlighting a cost-effective approach for initial deployment. In contrast, Symantec requires a more substantial initial investment for setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum offers a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, highlighting a cost-effective approach for initial deployment. In contrast, Symantec requires a more substantial initial investment for setup.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is known for competitive pricing and robust support, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers superior overall features. ESET excels in comprehensive threat detection and minimal system impact. In comparison, Symantec is recognized for advanced threat intelligence and extensive security capabilities.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers competitive setup costs while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise has slightly higher initial expenses but includes more comprehensive features. ESET is cost-efficient for basic needs, whereas Symantec justifies its premium with additional capa...
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers competitive setup costs while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise has slightly higher initial expenses but includes more comprehensive features. ESET is cost-efficient for basic needs, whereas Symantec justifies its premium with additional capa...
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Cynet is preferred for its automated threat detection, integration capabilities, and user-friendly threat reporting. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers advanced threat analytics, cross-platform protection, and comprehensive reporting tools. Cynet's simplicity contrasts with Symantec's extensive features, ideal for complex environments.
Download Cynet vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Cynet has a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise often incurs higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Cynet has a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise often incurs higher initial expenses.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One offers easy installation, platform compatibility, and continuous updates, appealing to those seeking adaptability. In comparison, Symantec provides proactive threat protection and emphasizes on-premise solutions, attracting businesses valuing robust security measures and traditional deployment preferences.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise vs. TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security presents a straightforward setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise might incur higher initial expenses due to its extensive feature set and more complex installation.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security presents a straightforward setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise might incur higher initial expenses due to its extensive feature set and more complex installation.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform
4.6 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers robust antivirus and AI-driven threat detection, while ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform emphasizes zero-trust with granular control. In comparison, Symantec may enhance threat intelligence, whereas ThreatLocker's pricing and policy management cater to flexible security needs.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform Report
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers competitive setup costs while ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform provides a more streamlined setup, highlighting key differences in pricing and implementation approach.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers competitive setup costs while ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform provides a more streamlined setup, highlighting key differences in pricing and implementation approach.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
Morphisec is valued for its cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment. In comparison, Symantec offers a comprehensive feature set. Morphisec stands out for its proactive threat prevention, while Symantec excels in advanced threat intelligence and extensive endpoint detection, justifying its higher price.
Download Morphisec vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Morphisec setup cost is straightforward and transparent, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise requires a higher investment with potential additional fees.
View comparison
Pricing
Morphisec setup cost is straightforward and transparent, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise requires a higher investment with potential additional fees.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise targets simplicity and scalability with features like machine learning and integrated firewall management. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR offers advanced threat detection and detailed insights, appealing to enterprises seeking enhanced threat analysis and patch management capabilities.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise has a complex setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR offers a simpler and more straightforward pricing model, highlighting a clear distinction in initial expenditure requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise has a complex setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR offers a simpler and more straightforward pricing model, highlighting a clear distinction in initial expenditure requirements.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Malwarebytes Teams
4.0 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Malwarebytes Teams
4.0 out of 5
Malwarebytes Teams offers ease of use, quick deployment, and effective threat eradication for smaller teams needing straightforward security solutions. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise provides extensive features like machine learning and firewall management, appealing to enterprises requiring comprehensive threat management.
Download Malwarebytes Teams vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Malwarebytes Teams has a low setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is known for its higher initial expenses, showcasing their differing budget considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
Malwarebytes Teams has a low setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is known for its higher initial expenses, showcasing their differing budget considerations.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business
3.8 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers customizable security features, making it ideal for organizations requiring comprehensive on-premises and hybrid protection. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Business integrates seamlessly with Microsoft products, appealing to businesses leveraging the Microsoft ecosystem for enhanced AI-driven threat detection.
Download Microsoft Defender for Business vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise typically incurs a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive features, while Microsoft Defender for Business offers a more budget-friendly setup, making each option distinct in terms of initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise typically incurs a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive features, while Microsoft Defender for Business offers a more budget-friendly setup, making each option distinct in terms of initial expenses.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
3.9 out of 5

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response offers advanced threat detection with real-time visualizations and aligns with MITRE ATT&CK. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise emphasizes basic antivirus and strong firewall management, appealing to those prioritizing device control and policy crafting.

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has a low setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise typically involves a higher setup cost. Cybereason is favorable for budget-conscious implementations, whereas Symantec may require more substantial initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has a low setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise typically involves a higher setup cost. Cybereason is favorable for budget-conscious implementations, whereas Symantec may require more substantial initial investment.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Norton Small Business
4.3 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise targets larger businesses needing advanced threat protection with detailed customization. In comparison, Norton Small Business offers straightforward security, ideal for small businesses with limited IT resources and a focus on cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment.
Download Norton Small Business vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise includes setup costs that may be higher than Norton Small Business, which offers more affordable options.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise includes setup costs that may be higher than Norton Small Business, which offers more affordable options.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Bitdefender Total Security
4.4 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers comprehensive protection with advanced AI features for threat detection. In comparison, Bitdefender Total Security integrates well with Azure, providing robust malware protection alongside features like VPN. Tech buyers might choose Symantec for scalability and Bitdefender for Azure compatibility.
Download Bitdefender Total Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender Total Security, making it potentially more suitable for larger organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender Total Security, making it potentially more suitable for larger organizations.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Sophos Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Sophos Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Sophos Endpoint excels in antivirus protections and centralized management, making it attractive for cloud deployments with flexible pricing. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint offers advanced firewall management, suited for on-premise setups with moderate to high pricing focusing on comprehensive network threat defenses.
Download Sophos Endpoint vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Sophos Endpoint has a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, whose setup cost is higher, marking a significant difference in initial expenditure between the two services.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos Endpoint has a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, whose setup cost is higher, marking a significant difference in initial expenditure between the two services.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Automox
4.4 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Automox
4.4 out of 5
Automox is valued for its flexibility, automation, and comprehensive patch management, offering real-time visibility and cloud-native architecture. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers robust security with AI-driven threat detection and integrated firewall management, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive protection.
Download Automox vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Automox has low setup costs and an intuitive setup process, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise requires a higher initial investment and a more complex setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Automox has low setup costs and an intuitive setup process, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise requires a higher initial investment and a more complex setup.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Avast Business Hub
4.1 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Avast Business Hub
4.1 out of 5
Avast Business Hub is praised for cost-effectiveness and support, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is valued for its comprehensive features. In comparison, Symantec’s advanced threat protection and AI-driven functionalities distinguish it from Avast’s intuitive design and efficient malware detection. In comparison, Avast offers simpler deployment and better support responsiveness.
Download Avast Business Hub vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Avast Business Hub has a low initial setup cost, whereas Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise requires higher upfront investment. Symantec provides additional advanced security features, justifying its higher setup cost compared to Avast.
View comparison
Pricing
Avast Business Hub has a low initial setup cost, whereas Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise requires higher upfront investment. Symantec provides additional advanced security features, justifying its higher setup cost compared to Avast.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum
4.2 out of 5
Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum is valued for advanced threat detection and comprehensive control with cost-effective pricing. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers robust firewall and intrusion prevention, with flexible licensing but considered pricier, appealing to those prioritizing enterprise-level security features.
Download Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum offers a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, highlighting a cost-effective entry point for users. Symantec, however, demands a higher initial investment, suggesting a focus on extensive feature sets.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum offers a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, highlighting a cost-effective entry point for users. Symantec, however, demands a higher initial investment, suggesting a focus on extensive feature sets.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection
3.7 out of 5
Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection offers lightweight operation and effective malware detection. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise provides a broader feature set, including behavioral analysis and threat intelligence. Bitdefender excels in ease of deployment, while Symantec is appreciated for its detailed support and extensive security features.
Download Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection's setup cost is affordable according to user reviews, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is noted for a higher setup cost. Symantec's cost may be a consideration for businesses comparing the two.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection's setup cost is affordable according to user reviews, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is noted for a higher setup cost. Symantec's cost may be a consideration for businesses comparing the two.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Kaspersky Small Office Security
4.1 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers robust threat protection with advanced features like machine learning, appealing to enterprises needing scalability. In comparison, Kaspersky Small Office Security provides cost-effective, comprehensive endpoint protection with user-friendly setup, ideal for small businesses prioritizing affordability and efficient management.
Download Kaspersky Small Office Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise has a higher setup cost, whereas Kaspersky Small Office Security is more affordable, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment required for each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise has a higher setup cost, whereas Kaspersky Small Office Security is more affordable, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment required for each solution.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security
4.1 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers comprehensive protection, flexible pricing, and ease of use, making it ideal for businesses seeking efficient deployment. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise excels in antivirus and machine learning, suitable for those prioritizing real-time threat detection in hybrid environments.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, highlighting a significant difference in upfront investment requirements between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, highlighting a significant difference in upfront investment requirements between the two solutions.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection
4.2 out of 5
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection offers robust malware protection and ease of use. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise features advanced threat intelligence and integration. Comodo's ease of deployment appeals to limited IT resources, while Symantec's extensive features justify its higher investment.
Download Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection has a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, which offers a more extensive and costly initial setup. Symantec's setup includes advanced configurations, making it pricier but possibly more comprehensive.
View comparison
Pricing
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection has a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, which offers a more extensive and costly initial setup. Symantec's setup includes advanced configurations, making it pricier but possibly more comprehensive.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
4.0 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection appeals to those seeking user-friendly setups and affordable pricing with responsive support. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise attracts buyers needing comprehensive security features like AI-enhanced detection and network protection, despite its higher cost and more complex deployment.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection has a lower setup cost, whereas Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise comes with higher initial pricing, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection has a lower setup cost, whereas Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise comes with higher initial pricing, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Kaspersky Next MXDR Optimum
4.0 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers strong protection with competitive pricing and efficient support, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Kaspersky Next MXDR Optimum provides advanced features and high ROI, attracting those who prioritize comprehensive security and innovative solutions.
Download Kaspersky Next MXDR Optimum vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers a streamlined setup process with lower initial costs, while Kaspersky Next MXDR Optimum may involve higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers a streamlined setup process with lower initial costs, while Kaspersky Next MXDR Optimum may involve higher setup expenses.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud
2.3 out of 5
Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud is favored for its competitive pricing and efficient customer service, ideal for quick and cost-effective implementation. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers comprehensive features and customization, justifying its higher price for organizations seeking advanced security measures.
Download Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud features a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise involves a higher setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud features a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise involves a higher setup expense.

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)