No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo

Top 10 Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Alternatives

Vendor: Broadcom
4.0 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint, and Tanium. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat protection, superior AI-driven malware detection, and comprehensive endpoint management, ensuring robust defense against evolving cyber threats and seamless integration for enterprise-level security solutions.

Broadcom Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Broadcom, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR offers advanced EDR features and a user-friendly dashboard, appealing to organizations needing comprehensive threat intelligence. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise provides robust anti-malware protection with competitive pricing, suiting businesses prioritizing strong baseline security with flexible licensing.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR has a higher setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, highlighting significant financial considerations for organizations when choosing between these two security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR has a higher setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, highlighting significant financial considerations for organizations when choosing between these two security solutions.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint excels in behavior-based AI detection and real-time threat mitigation, ideal for complex IT environments. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers robust antivirus and anti-malware protection, making it suitable for enterprises focusing on comprehensive network security.
Download SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete typically incurs lower setup costs compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, highlighting its cost-effectiveness for initial deployment. Symantec offers a robust setup with potentially higher costs, emphasizing extensive security features.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete typically incurs lower setup costs compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, highlighting its cost-effectiveness for initial deployment. Symantec offers a robust setup with potentially higher costs, emphasizing extensive security features.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
Tanium offers strong pricing, agile deployment, and superior customer support. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise delivers a robust feature set with comprehensive malware protection. Tech buyers might choose Tanium for cost-effectiveness and speed, while others might prefer Symantec for its extensive security features.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise vs. Tanium Report
Tanium involves a significant upfront setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers a more moderate setup expense, highlighting the key cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Tanium involves a significant upfront setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers a more moderate setup expense, highlighting the key cost difference between the two solutions.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
4.0 out of 5
Trellix offers affordable endpoint security, emphasizing threat prevention with features like machine learning and strong access control. In comparison, Symantec excels in firewall management and intrusion prevention, integrating advanced AI and machine learning for robust malware protection, catering to varied enterprise needs with flexible licensing options.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a flexible setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise presents a more traditional pricing structure, highlighting distinct approaches in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a flexible setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise presents a more traditional pricing structure, highlighting distinct approaches in initial investment.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
HP Wolf Security offers affordable, efficient threat isolation and containment, along with straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise provides advanced threat intelligence and machine learning capabilities, appealing to enterprises needing feature-rich, comprehensive protection despite higher costs and occasional setup complexities.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
HP Wolf Security has a higher setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise. Users noted the differences in initial expenditure between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security has a higher setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise. Users noted the differences in initial expenditure between the two solutions.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is known for competitive pricing and robust support, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers superior overall features. ESET excels in comprehensive threat detection and minimal system impact. In comparison, Symantec is recognized for advanced threat intelligence and extensive security capabilities.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers competitive setup costs while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise has slightly higher initial expenses but includes more comprehensive features. ESET is cost-efficient for basic needs, whereas Symantec justifies its premium with additional capa...
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers competitive setup costs while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise has slightly higher initial expenses but includes more comprehensive features. ESET is cost-efficient for basic needs, whereas Symantec justifies its premium with additional capa...
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One offers easy installation, platform compatibility, and continuous updates, appealing to those seeking adaptability. In comparison, Symantec provides proactive threat protection and emphasizes on-premise solutions, attracting businesses valuing robust security measures and traditional deployment preferences.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise vs. TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security presents a straightforward setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise might incur higher initial expenses due to its extensive feature set and more complex installation.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security presents a straightforward setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise might incur higher initial expenses due to its extensive feature set and more complex installation.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform
4.6 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise appeals with its comprehensive protection features and holistic security approach. In comparison, ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform excels in offering rigorous control and precise application visibility, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing strict application control and resource efficiency.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform Report
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise has a higher initial setup cost, while ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform offers a more budget-friendly alternative.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise has a higher initial setup cost, while ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform offers a more budget-friendly alternative.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise excels in advanced threat protection and integration with various security tools, making it suitable for users needing robust malware defense. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR's automated threat hunting and response features offer comprehensive endpoint activity visibility, ideal for proactive threat neutralization.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise has a complex setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR offers a simpler and more straightforward pricing model, highlighting a clear distinction in initial expenditure requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise has a complex setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR offers a simpler and more straightforward pricing model, highlighting a clear distinction in initial expenditure requirements.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business
3.8 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise delivers powerful firewall management and comprehensive network security in one platform. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Business shines with integration in Microsoft ecosystems and AI-powered analysis, appealing to those seeking seamless compatibility and predictive threat capabilities.
Download Microsoft Defender for Business vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise involves higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Business, highlighting a key pricing difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise involves higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Business, highlighting a key pricing difference.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Malwarebytes Teams
4.0 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Malwarebytes Teams
4.0 out of 5
Malwarebytes Teams offers ease of use, quick deployment, and effective threat eradication for smaller teams needing straightforward security solutions. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise provides extensive features like machine learning and firewall management, appealing to enterprises requiring comprehensive threat management.
Download Malwarebytes Teams vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Malwarebytes Teams has a low setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is known for its higher initial expenses, showcasing their differing budget considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
Malwarebytes Teams has a low setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is known for its higher initial expenses, showcasing their differing budget considerations.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Bitdefender Total Security
4.4 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise emphasizes comprehensive protection and management, while Bitdefender Total Security offers advanced features like multi-layer ransomware protection. In comparison, Bitdefender has extensive features, but Symantec integrates seamlessly into existing systems, appealing to buyers seeking performance and cost-effectiveness.
Download Bitdefender Total Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender Total Security, making it potentially more suitable for larger organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender Total Security, making it potentially more suitable for larger organizations.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
3.9 out of 5

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response offers advanced threat detection with real-time visualizations and aligns with MITRE ATT&CK. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise emphasizes basic antivirus and strong firewall management, appealing to those prioritizing device control and policy crafting.

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has a low setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise typically involves a higher setup cost. Cybereason is favorable for budget-conscious implementations, whereas Symantec may require more substantial initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has a low setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise typically involves a higher setup cost. Cybereason is favorable for budget-conscious implementations, whereas Symantec may require more substantial initial investment.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Kaspersky Small Office Security
4.1 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers robust AI-driven threat detection and scalable deployment. In comparison, Kaspersky Total Security emphasizes ease of use with a user-friendly interface. Symantec is ideal for complex infrastructures, whereas Kaspersky appeals to cost-conscious buyers seeking reliable endpoint protection.
Download Kaspersky Small Office Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers straightforward setup with competitive costs, whereas Kaspersky Total Security requires lower initial investment. The primary difference centers on initial investment versus streamlined deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers straightforward setup with competitive costs, whereas Kaspersky Total Security requires lower initial investment. The primary difference centers on initial investment versus streamlined deployment.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum
4.2 out of 5
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers advanced detection, automated real-time threat response, and cost-effectiveness, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise provides superior multi-layered protection features, making it attractive to those prioritizing comprehensive security despite higher costs.
Download Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum has a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, highlighting a significant difference in initial expenses for organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum has a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, highlighting a significant difference in initial expenses for organizations.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security
4.1 out of 5

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is noted for advanced threat protection and low performance impact. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers better integration capabilities and a comprehensive security suite. Bitdefender may suit those prioritizing cost and ROI, while Symantec appeals for its extensive features and reliability.

Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, highlighting a significant difference in upfront investment requirements between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, highlighting a significant difference in upfront investment requirements between the two solutions.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
4.0 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection features advanced threat detection and seamless integration, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers comprehensive security measures and extensive device management. In comparison, Symantec provides detailed reporting and customization, making it ideal for larger enterprises, whereas WithSecure's competitive pricing and quick deployment attract smaller to mid-sized businesses.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection has a lower setup cost, whereas Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise comes with higher initial pricing, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection has a lower setup cost, whereas Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise comes with higher initial pricing, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection
4.2 out of 5
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection offers robust malware protection and ease of use. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise features advanced threat intelligence and integration. Comodo's ease of deployment appeals to limited IT resources, while Symantec's extensive features justify its higher investment.
Download Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection has a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, which offers a more extensive and costly initial setup. Symantec's setup includes advanced configurations, making it pricier but possibly more comprehensive.
View comparison
Pricing
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection has a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, which offers a more extensive and costly initial setup. Symantec's setup includes advanced configurations, making it pricier but possibly more comprehensive.
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud
2.3 out of 5
Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud is appreciated for its intuitive management console and ease of deployment, making it ideal for small to medium-sized enterprises. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers advanced threat intelligence and is suited for larger organizations despite a more complex deployment process.
Download Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud features a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise involves a higher setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud features a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise involves a higher setup expense.

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Anti-Malware Tools