Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection comparison

Broadcom and WithSecure are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Broadcom is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.2, while WithSecure is ranked #45 with an average rating of 7.5. Broadcom holds a 0.7% mindshare in EPP, compared to WithSecure’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WithSecure users who would recommend it.
Symantec Endpoint Security ...
Read 32 Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise reviews
  • 1,127 Views
  • 1,116 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
WithSecure Elements Endpoin...
Read 8 WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reviews
  • 1,464 Views
  • 1,449 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection and Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise are two leading products in endpoint security. Symantec seems to edge ahead in several critical areas based on user reviews.

Features: Users highlight WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection for its innovative threat detection, cloud-native management, and ease of use. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is praised for its broad threat intelligence network, advanced analytics, and comprehensive security features. Symantec appears superior due to its more robust feature set.

Room for Improvement: WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection users suggest enhancements in reporting capabilities, real-time updates, and user interface. Users of Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise point to issues with performance impact, increased configuration complexity, and support response times. Symantec's configuration complexities stand out more prominently.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection scores high on ease of deployment and proactive customer service. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise has more mixed reviews, with some users experiencing prolonged setup times but receiving strong post-deployment support. WithSecure offers a smoother deployment experience.

Pricing and ROI: Users feel WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection delivers good value with a straightforward pricing model and solid return on investment. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise tends to be viewed as costlier, yet users perceive its extensive features as worth the higher price point. WithSecure is more attractive for cost-conscious buyers, but Symantec’s feature-rich approach justifies its price for others.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 879,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Symantec Endpoint Security ...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
20th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
WithSecure Elements Endpoin...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
45th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise0.7%
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection1.0%
Other98.3%
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2162541 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer2162541
IT Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Provides stable and resource-efficient protection but lacks clear modern security features
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is highly compatible and rarely causes disruptions in production. It operates transparently and is easy to maintain. The automated response feature helps to mitigate breaches effectively. When comparing with ThreatDown agent, I have noticed that ThreatDown detects behaviors more readily and flags suspicious user activities more clearly. While Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise remains effective, ThreatDown's user interface is more manageable and provides a clearer system overview. The management interface is crucial for maintaining Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise effectively. A significant advantage of Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is its lightweight resource usage. It consumes less memory, CPU, and IO compared to alternatives such as ThreatDown and Bitdefender.
Read full review
Mark Feldman - PeerSpot reviewer
Mark Feldman
IT-Manager at MKF-Schimanski-ERGIS GmbH
Central console streamlines patch monitoring and device management effortlessly
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up. I provide an installation file for every client through my domain controller and GPO, and it works properly. We have faced no incidents with viruses or network breaches, and it's easy to monitor patches. I can use remote desktop from the central console. The solution also saves my time because, being the only one handling it, I can monitor all devices easily.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"What I appreciate the most about Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is the integration with the workstations and the around-the-clock monitoring."
"The solution is useful for endpoint protection."
"The most valuable feature of Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is it runs in the backend and looks after the security for you."
"Endpoint protection solution with machine learning, device control, and application control features. It is scalable and stable."
"The solution is very cheap."
"The most valuable features of Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise are the proactive threat protection and the normal spyware protection which they offer in addition to catching standard threats. It all works well for us even without an EDR."
"The tool is a secure and stable workstation for checking antivirus. The alerting feature helps us see alerts and is easy to control. The main benefit we derive from using Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is stability."
"The firewall management and intrusion prevention are excellent; those are the critical differences between Symantec and most other products on the market, as they don't manage Windows Firewall or offer intrusion prevention."
More Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise pros
"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up."
"We use the product for detecting network vulnerabilities and for software update purposes."
"F-Secure is useful for keeping user machines up-to-date by pushing out security and critical updates."
"The most valuable features of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are the clear useful portal and overall company protection."
"There is a layer of security to prevent a malicious agent (malware) from interrupting or stopping services, deleting or modifying registry entries or even stopping the antivirus from acting, ensuring that there will be no interruption of protection."
"Both incoming and outgoing traffic is protected."
"The notifications and patch management features are valuable."
"On the cloud management page, the solution scales up very highly."
 

Cons

"I have contacted support and the speed of resolution could be faster."
"The tool needs to improve its dashboard."
"In the past, I experienced companies that protected themselves with Symantec, suffering some attacks."
"Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise needs to improve its manageability. It is not easy to manage."
"Though the product is good, it is not very easy to use."
"An area for improvement for Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise would be its firewall features, in particular, this solution needs to provide more firewall controls."
"The scanning area of the product should be made a little faster as it is the only area of concern in the tool where improvements are required."
"Symantec's main priority should be enhancing their support, especially local support for different regions."
More Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise cons
"There could be a dedicated security partner with essential knowledge."
"The program and cloud service management is in English. It's not a problem for me, however, it might be for users who don't speak English or use it regularly."
"There is no technical support available in the Middle East."
"The solution could improve by having more real-time responses. For example, when a license gets removed from a computer it does not update the records of the change. Additionally, when I installed Microsoft Windows Defender I was not able to send licenses through email to our tenants. The integration with other solutions could improve."
"One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client."
"But the biggest one for us is patch management because this has been our top priority when looking at alternatives. Every solution needs to have patch management, if that's possible. It would cut costs on our side if that feature were included, so we don't need to pay for two separate pieces of software."
"I would like the part of Hash Analysis by external sources to be improved."
"Resource consumption is suboptimal and could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate it a seven, indicating a satisfactory and moderate level. Despite being somewhat on the expensive side, it aligns with our long-standing relationship with Symantec, and we find it acceptable."
"It's not the cheapest, but it's reasonably priced, around a five on a scale from one to ten. It's suitable for small, medium, and enterprise businesses and offers competitive pricing. There are no additional costs; it's a renewable purchase, either annually or as needed."
"The price of Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is expensive. When compared to other solutions they should reduce the price."
"I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten. For most organizations, the cost is between 70 and 100 dollars per user. The exact price depends on the selected features and the number of users. It's considered a premium cost for an enterprise Endpoint security solution."
"The price of the solution is very low. There is an annual subscription to use the solution."
"The product is not very expensive."
"If you have a variety of different endpoints, including heavily protected endpoints and some endpoints that are in the field, Symantec allows you to apply different licensing so you don't have to put everything under Endpoint Complete."
"I rate Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise's pricing a two out of ten."
More Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise pricing and cost advice
"The cost of the solution depends on the size of the company and where the licenses are being ordered from."
"We pay a yearly licensing fee of about €20 per computer."
"If you purchase licenses in bulk the price of the licenses can decrease."
"The price is comparable."
"The product has average pricing."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Computer Software Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
23%
Computer Software Company
13%
University
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business16
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Large Enterprise1
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise?
The tool is a secure and stable workstation for checking antivirus. The alerting feature helps us see alerts and is easy to control. The main benefit we derive from using Symantec Endpoint Security...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise?
I have not experienced integrated threat intelligence benefits with Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise. Many customers are seeking modern protection features such as MDR (managed detection and r...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise?
The primary use case for Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise for my clients is basic antivirus protection.
See all answers
What do you like most about F-Secure Protection Service for Business?
The notifications and patch management features are valuable.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?
The pricing is scalable. We can purchase more licenses if needed. It's a more cost-effective solution compared to Darktrace, which requires a special device purchase.
See all answers
What needs improvement with F-Secure Protection Service for Business?
One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client. It would help if it used less RAM in future versions.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Symantec Endpoint Security Complete vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Complete vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise
Compared 47% of the time
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise
Compared 14% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise
Compared 10% of the time
Symantec Endpoint Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise
Compared 9% of the time
HP Wolf Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Logo
HP Wolf Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise
Compared 8% of the time
More Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 17% of the time
Sophos EPP Suite vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Sophos EPP Suite vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 9% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 8% of the time
Bitdefender Total Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Bitdefender Total Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 7% of the time
Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 6% of the time
More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise
December 2025
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise reportDownload Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise product report
Buyer's Guide
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
December 2025
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reportDownload WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
F-Secure Elements Endpoint Protection, F-Secure Protection Service for Business
 

Overview

Endpoint Security Enterprise focuses on advanced prevention for traditional endpoints and modern mobile devices. To include attack surface reduction capabilities and detection and response technologies, check out Endpoint Security Complete.

Broadcom
WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Protection is cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection that you can deploy instantly from your browser and manage easily from a single console. It integrates across all your endpoints, keeping your organization fenced in from attacks. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.
WithSecure
Buyer's Guide
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
December 2025
Free Report: Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Find out what your peers are saying about Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.