Service and Support
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence customer service is mixed. Users find support responses to be slow and complex due to shared portals with SAP products; faster responses are desired. Some appreciate strategic partnerships ensuring quick assistance, while others never needed help due to self-sufficiency in building data feeds. The support system's promptness and AI-equipped knowledge base receive praise, though Celonis is considered superior by some. Improvements could include distinct module-specific support for ease of use.
Deployment
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence's initial setup is commonly perceived as easy and straightforward, especially for those using it with SAP as the source system. For connections with other systems, challenges were noted. Deployment timelines varied, ranging from a few days to several weeks, often depending on project scope. Some entities deployed it quickly, citing minimal required resources, while others employed external BPM experts. Customization might involve junior and senior developers for tailored needs.
Scalability
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is generally considered scalable, especially for large enterprises. While some note constraints, many users appreciate its adaptability for complex processes and large teams. However, scalability ratings vary, with some citing integration complexities and cost considerations. Its design favors non-IT users, making it accessible for organizational transformation. Multiple clients indicate variable user experiences, largely influenced by organizational size and specific requirements.
Stability
Many users find SAP Signavio Process Intelligence stable, rating its stability between six to ten, often highlighting a lack of downtime and few issues with bugs or glitches. Some experience occasional page loading problems, though these are typically resolved efficiently. Continuous development efforts are noted, with customer feedback emphasizing efficient system functionality while recognizing that stability ratings can vary, with a few users rating it lower due to some technical challenges.