Top 10 SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud Alternatives

Vendor: SAP

4.1 out of 5

25 reviews
89% willing to recommend

Top SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, and Google Cloud. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud surpasses its competitors by offering a scalable, secure platform with real-time analytics, flexible deployment options, and seamless integration capabilities, empowering businesses to make data-driven decisions and streamline operations with ease.

SAP Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with SAP, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Microsoft Azure

4.2 out of 5

Microsoft Azure

4.2 out of 5

Microsoft Azure attracts tech buyers with its flexibility, broad service range, and scalability while enhancing cost management through a flexible pricing model. In comparison, SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud efficiently integrates with SAP solutions, offers intuitive data processing, and supports real-time business needs, despite higher costs.

Download Microsoft Azure vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud Report

Pricing

Microsoft Azure offers flexibility in setup costs, while SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud often requires a higher, more complex initial investment. Azure is more cost-effective upfront, whereas SAP HANA requires significant infrastructure commitment.

View comparison

Pricing

Amazon AWS

4.2 out of 5

Amazon AWS

4.2 out of 5

Amazon AWS excels in dynamic pricing, scalable configurations, and versatile database support, making it ideal for diverse applications. In comparison, SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud offers built-in applications and seamless SAP integration, attracting businesses heavily using SAP systems. AWS provides flexibility; SAP delivers integration and system management.

Download Amazon AWS vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud Report

Pricing

Amazon AWS has a flexible pay-as-you-go model, reducing initial setup costs, while SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud often requires a higher upfront investment, reflecting its tailored enterprise solutions and specialized infrastructure.

View comparison

Pricing

Google Cloud

4.2 out of 5

Google Cloud

4.2 out of 5

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud specializes in ERP integration, appealing to SAP-centric businesses. In comparison, Google Cloud offers expansive scalability and advanced AI tools, attracting diverse tech needs. SAP is ideal for established SAP environments, while Google supports adaptable deployment and broad pricing options.

Download Google Cloud vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud Report

Pricing

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud's setup cost is notably higher than Google Cloud, reflecting differences in service offerings and feature sets. Google Cloud offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, appealing to businesses with cost constraints.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI)

3.9 out of 5

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI)

3.9 out of 5

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud excels in SAP integration, ideal for businesses needing seamless SAP application support. In comparison, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offers advanced features and higher cost-effectiveness, appealing to enterprises valuing scalability and superior technology integration despite deployment requiring more technical effort.

Download Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud Report

Pricing

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud involves significant initial setup costs, whereas Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) offers a more cost-effective setup option, highlighting crucial budget differences for organizations.

View comparison

Pricing

Google Firebase

4.2 out of 5

Google Firebase

4.2 out of 5

Google Firebase attracts tech buyers with cost-effective, flexible pricing and real-time database features. In comparison, SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud appeals for its comprehensive enterprise solutions despite higher costs. Firebase suits startups, whereas HANA targets larger enterprises with significant budgets and complex needs.

Download Google Firebase vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud Report

Pricing

Google Firebase offers a cost-effective setup while SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud involves higher upfront expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Google Firebase offers a cost-effective setup while SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud involves higher upfront expenses.

SAP S4HANA on AWS

4.2 out of 5

SAP S4HANA on AWS

4.2 out of 5

SAP S4HANA on AWS offers seamless integration and real-time data processing ideal for complex operations. In comparison, SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud emphasizes ease with cloud-managed services, minimizing internal resource needs, making it suitable for organizations seeking simplified ERP with robust support management.

Download SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS Report

Pricing

SAP S4HANA on AWS generally involves a lower setup cost with flexible resource scalability, while SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud often requires higher initial investment, offering a more comprehensive managed service experience.

View comparison

Pricing

Media Temple IaaS Cloud

1 out of 5

Media Temple IaaS Cloud

1 out of 5

View comparison

Related categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

PaaS Clouds

Marketing Intelligence