Amazon Bedrock vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and SAP are both solutions in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.4, while SAP is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.1. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Amazon Bedrock

Read 11 Amazon Bedrock reviews

212 Views
153 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Read 22 SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud reviews

1,789 Views
1,295 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Amazon Bedrock

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 16, 2024

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud and Amazon Bedrock are key competitors in the cloud computing sector. Amazon Bedrock stands out with its stronger AI capabilities, while SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud excels in analytics and integration, making it more appealing in data-centric applications.

Features: SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud offers robust data integration, comprehensive analytics, and effective management of complex data environments. Amazon Bedrock is notable for its AI-driven features, seamless AI application integration, and enhanced automation capabilities.

Room for Improvement: SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud could benefit from easier scalability, improved user interface, and reduced setup complexity. Amazon Bedrock might enhance its analytics capabilities, offer more detailed reporting features, and expand its customer support services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud ensures reliable deployment with strong customer service and personalized assistance. Amazon Bedrock provides efficient AI integration and user-friendly deployment practices, though SAP HANA surpasses in customer service excellence.

Pricing and ROI: SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud has higher setup costs but offers significant long-term ROI due to its analytics features. Amazon Bedrock presents competitive pricing with scalability, aiming for a faster ROI through AI efficiencies, making it cost-effective for businesses prioritizing AI.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Bedrock vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Bedrock vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Bedrock

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

13th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Infrastructure (3rd)

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Charles Powell

Advisory Board Member at AllmaGen, Inc.

Very good security features for strengthened data protection

I am not going to speak to their roadmap. Amazon operates Bedrock as an ecosystem supporting third-party models. I am speculating here, but I am sure those third-party models will always be present. However, one must consider that Amazon native models could proliferate Bedrock in the future. We would welcome Amazon native models to Bedrock, since, if they are natively built by Amazon, they are tuned to SageMaker and other Amazon service layers. They have done this somewhat for generative AI, however, in AgenTek AI business, the only foundation models we can rely on for scaling now are the Cloud 3.5 models like Haiku and SONNET, designed for low latency and complex AI business use cases.

Read full review

Suresh Tanneeru

Vice President at Dataflix

High stability, reasonably priced, and important for digital transformations

Customers need to be better educated about using the solution's cloud for digital transformation. SAP as a legacy system is missing that flavor. The solution is not a traditional ERP software so should be used as a digital transformation tool. That is the story to project to customers, partners, and sales teams. This will help the solution grow faster than GCP, AWS, or Azure. In fact, Google Cloud Platform is now collaborating with SAP for digital transformation. The solution should offer affordable modules that are customized to startups with 50 to 500 employees. Most people think of SAP as being only for big enterprises but it could be very useful for smaller companies. There are 40,000 to 50,000 startups in APAC each year and that is a large volume. Many of the solution's modules could be used by those startups. Google is targeting this market with chat boards and automation tools at a reasonable price or with six months of free usage. SAP should come up with this kind of module and include sandbox so providers can play with a few of the POCs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Data encryption while in transit and at rest is managed through Bedrock account."

"The most valuable feature of Bedrock is its security and the model's ability to modify vector dimensions easily."

"Bedrock offers various foundational models in one place."

"The no-code application of the service is beneficial since it allows creating solutions without extensive coding knowledge."

"The most beneficial aspect of Bedrock is its pool of models to choose from, catering to specific needs."

"Amazon Bedrock offers an environment where we only pay for the model we use, and AWS handles the scaling."

"Amazon Bedrock is easy to use and practical, allowing for quick development."

"The integration with pre-trained AI models has been very beneficial, allowing me to quickly access powerful machine learning models without the need to build them from scratch."

More Amazon Bedrock pros

"The solution does provide quite a lot of support, upgrades, automated batch updates, etc."

"What I like the most is that we can convert databases into a proper multi-dimensional model, and then we can project with the integration with Power BI."

"The solution is stable and we have never had a problem. We started with one terabyte of data when the solution was first implemented and today we have around almost 600 gigabytes of data, which means means the compression works properly. Before migrating from ECC, we had nine terabytes of data."

"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."

"It is a stable and scalable product."

"The scalability is good because we have some cloud resources to support the ERP."

"The real-time data processing and the ability to track all leasing processes and contracts are particularly valuable."

"The processes and the way we take advantage and use assistance are good."

More SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud pros

Cons

"While working with Bedrock, I incurred charges that were not explicitly mentioned in the pricing documentation."

"Amazon native models could proliferate Bedrock in the future. We would welcome Amazon native models to Bedrock since, if they are natively built by Amazon, they are tuned to SageMaker and other Amazon service layers."

"I would appreciate a greater focus on agentic Gen AI applications in Bedrock."

"There is a need for improved documentation, smoother integration, and possibly reduced prices given the competition."

"Bedrock could be improved by having an API that allows for easy integration with services outside of Bedrock."

"The user interface of Amazon Bedrock on the management console needs improvements. It's very bland at the moment."

"The user interface of Amazon Bedrock on the management console needs improvements."

"The advantage of Bedrock is not as an amazing enabler of AI platforms, yet we utilize it to deploy application services and microservices within Bedrock ecosystem and leverage prequalified foundation models like Claude and others."

More Amazon Bedrock cons

"The cost could be improved. I think it's higher than the competition."

"I would rate the stability a four out of ten. It's an area that could use improvement"

"They should probably offer more cloud services. Most of the cloud infrastructure providers we have make everything pretty transparent, you know what you're getting, you have all these metrics and measurements and everything in the dashboard. Here you have to go through the contracting negotiations and all those things."

"The customer has a lot of dependencies on SAP which means they don't have much flexibility to go and update the system when or if they need to. They will need to wait for the quarterly updates. It's possible to maybe raise a special request with SAP if it is absolutely necessary."

"The SAP products are complicated to deploy anywhere."

"SAP should adopt more rapid changes in market processes and customer needs to deliver solutions that meet new industry requirements swiftly."

"The solution is scalable from an infrastructure point of view. However, it becomes more complex over time because technology is changing so fast."

"The stability needs to be improved to be able to handle large amounts of data."

More SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of using Amazon Bedrock is quite high, as I incurred unexpected charges amounting to $130 USD within two weeks without actually deploying the model."

"One customer paid around $100 to $200 per month, which was significant given their overall infrastructure costs."

"I rate the product's price a five out of ten."

"The price is on little bit higher. For SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud, we see roughly five crores per annum."

"The solution's cost is reasonable."

"The product itself is relatively expensive."

"The price is high compared to other databases, which is why HANA is still not widely used. Some enterprises prefer Sybase, Oracle, or other traditional databases because HANA is a little pricey. Cost is one factor SAP needs to work on to make it more competitive with other databases. Otherwise, they'll never be able to develop a mass customer base."

"The licensing of the solution is on a yearly basis. The normal price of the solution is quite high, but I received a special discount by making a purchase near the end of the year."

"Our pricing is based on a yearly contract."

"The solution could be less expensive."

More SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Transportation Company

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Bedrock?

The pricing and licensing of Amazon Bedrock are quite flexible.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Bedrock?

Currently, I do not have any thoughts about what areas of Amazon Bedrock need improvement.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon Bedrock?

I am using Amazon Bedrock ( /products/amazon-bedrock-reviews ) mainly to do some analysis of customer support calls.

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud?

It has significantly streamlined our operations.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud?

SAP HANA Cloud can be quite costly compared to other solutions. The high licensing costs make it an expensive option, particularly for smaller customers. However, they offer solutions for mid-sized...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud?

SAP should adopt more rapid changes in market processes and customer needs to deliver solutions that meet new industry requirements swiftly. SAP finance needs to be more advanced to keep up with cu...

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Amazon Bedrock

Compared 32% of the time

GroqCloud Platform vs Amazon Bedrock

Compared 16% of the time

Google Vertex AI vs Amazon Bedrock

Compared 16% of the time

NVIDIA DGX Platform vs Amazon Bedrock

Compared 11% of the time

Alibaba Cloud vs Amazon Bedrock

Compared 8% of the time

More Amazon Bedrock Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Compared 48% of the time

Amazon AWS vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Compared 29% of the time

SAP S4HANA on AWS vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Compared 17% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

More SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Bedrock

April 2025

Download Amazon Bedrock product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

April 2025

Download SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud product report

Overview

Amazon Bedrock enhances AI integration by providing a suite of foundational models with customization options. It simplifies data integration and offers security, traceability, and cost-efficiency through its serverless architecture.

Amazon Bedrock empowers users by offering models from multiple providers, ensuring model flexibility and ease of use. It supports quick development for applications such as vector search and SQL query generation. While the system is beneficial for AI integration and analytics enhancement, there is a desire for improved documentation, smoother integration, and more competitive pricing. Additional integration points, markdown features, and support for voice and images could enhance its use. Users also seek to optimize for hyperscale use and receive multiple responses for creative tasks.

What are the key features of Amazon Bedrock?

Security: Provides robust measures to ensure data protection.
Model Flexibility: Allows customization of foundational models.
Serverless Architecture: Offers cost-efficient, scalable resources.
Provider Access: Connects with models from different vendors.

What benefits should be considered?

Model Modification: Enables quick adjustments to suit needs.
Development Speed: Facilitates fast application development.
AI Integration: Integrates seamlessly into existing offerings.

In industries like data analytics and software development, Amazon Bedrock is implemented for tasks such as deploying large language models, performing sentiment analysis, and creating chatbots. It's used for generating AI-driven text and images, and enhancing data retrieval via SQL query generation.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is a fully scalable and secure private managed cloud solution. It empowers organizations to unlock the full value of SAP HANA in the cloud - accelerating growth and innovation, driving IT and business transformation, quickly delivering business outcomes, and reducing risk.

SAP

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

FC Bayern Munich, Reuters News Agency, MEMEBOX

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Bedrock vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

April 2025

Free Report: Amazon Bedrock vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Bedrock vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Bedrock vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud report.

See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.