Amazon Bedrock vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and SAP are both solutions in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.3, while SAP is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.1. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Amazon Bedrock

Read 12 Amazon Bedrock reviews

327 Views
234 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Read 22 SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud reviews

1,530 Views
1,069 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Amazon Bedrock

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 16, 2024

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud and Amazon Bedrock are key competitors in the cloud computing sector. Amazon Bedrock stands out with its stronger AI capabilities, while SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud excels in analytics and integration, making it more appealing in data-centric applications.

Features: SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud offers robust data integration, comprehensive analytics, and effective management of complex data environments. Amazon Bedrock is notable for its AI-driven features, seamless AI application integration, and enhanced automation capabilities.

Room for Improvement: SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud could benefit from easier scalability, improved user interface, and reduced setup complexity. Amazon Bedrock might enhance its analytics capabilities, offer more detailed reporting features, and expand its customer support services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud ensures reliable deployment with strong customer service and personalized assistance. Amazon Bedrock provides efficient AI integration and user-friendly deployment practices, though SAP HANA surpasses in customer service excellence.

Pricing and ROI: SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud has higher setup costs but offers significant long-term ROI due to its analytics features. Amazon Bedrock presents competitive pricing with scalability, aiming for a faster ROI through AI efficiencies, making it cost-effective for businesses prioritizing AI.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Bedrock vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Bedrock vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Bedrock

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Infrastructure (2nd)

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Charles Powell

Advisory Board Member at AllmaGen, Inc.

Very good security features for strengthened data protection

I am not going to speak to their roadmap. Amazon operates Bedrock as an ecosystem supporting third-party models. I am speculating here, but I am sure those third-party models will always be present. However, one must consider that Amazon native models could proliferate Bedrock in the future. We would welcome Amazon native models to Bedrock, since, if they are natively built by Amazon, they are tuned to SageMaker and other Amazon service layers. They have done this somewhat for generative AI, however, in AgenTek AI business, the only foundation models we can rely on for scaling now are the Cloud 3.5 models like Haiku and SONNET, designed for low latency and complex AI business use cases.

Read full review

Rajnikant Verma

SAP S4 Hana Solution Architect / Presales at Tech Mahindra Limited

Real-time data processing and good support with room for market-driven improvements

SAP RFX and overall SAP solutions provide a very intuitive and integrated solution within finance, leading procurement, and other business scenarios. The real-time data processing and the ability to track all leasing processes and contracts are particularly valuable. SAP's capability to integrate with other systems like GIS and non-SAP applications also stands out.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Bedrock is its security and the model's ability to modify vector dimensions easily."

"The impact of Amazon Bedrock's sophisticated natural language processing on our company's ability to predict future outcomes is very interesting because, before we were using some Python codes, we created server instances to upload it, and we had some difficulty integrating it with the ecosystem because all the features we were creating were manually based."

"One of the best features of Amazon Bedrock is that it is easy to use, and users do not have to worry about the infrastructure."

"The valuable feature of Bedrock is its flexibility and comprehensiveness in what it's offering, providing parameters that we can change."

"The integration with pre-trained AI models has been very beneficial, allowing me to quickly access powerful machine learning models without the need to build them from scratch."

"Bedrock proved beneficial for generating SQL queries, which helped in delivering precise information from the database."

"It is the best solution in this category and is rated a nine out of ten."

"Overall, I rate Amazon Bedrock ten out of ten."

More Amazon Bedrock pros

"It has significantly streamlined our operations."

"The scalability is good because we have some cloud resources to support the ERP."

"I am impressed with how the solution integrates with the ME system and ALE IDocs."

"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."

"My company has not had any problems with the product's initial setup phase."

"We have a wide range of use cases for SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud. These include production planning, materials management, sales management, treasury, finance, appliance maintenance, real estate, and warehouse management."

"The solution is stable and we have never had a problem. We started with one terabyte of data when the solution was first implemented and today we have around almost 600 gigabytes of data, which means means the compression works properly. Before migrating from ECC, we had nine terabytes of data."

"It is a scalable solution if you have a good cloud infrastructure."

More SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud pros

Cons

"It would be beneficial if Bedrock were optimized for hyperscale use to avoid needing a mixed approach with SageMaker."

"I would appreciate a greater focus on agentic Gen AI applications in Bedrock."

"Amazon native models could proliferate Bedrock in the future. We would welcome Amazon native models to Bedrock since, if they are natively built by Amazon, they are tuned to SageMaker and other Amazon service layers."

"The advantage of Bedrock is not as an amazing enabler of AI platforms, yet we utilize it to deploy application services and microservices within Bedrock ecosystem and leverage prequalified foundation models like Claude and others."

"It would be beneficial if Amazon Bedrock could provide multiple responses to a query, allowing users to choose the best option."

"For companies in general, the main pain point or main issue related to Amazon Bedrock is security because they are not confident that all information is hidden by this kind of architecture."

"While working with Bedrock, I incurred charges that were not explicitly mentioned in the pricing documentation."

"Overall, I rate Amazon Bedrock a seven out of ten. It is slightly difficult to integrate with our product."

More Amazon Bedrock cons

"Enterprise Cloud's reporting could be more automated to improve content accountability, especially regarding BI reports."

"The stability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The SAP products are complicated to deploy anywhere."

"SAP should adopt more rapid changes in market processes and customer needs to deliver solutions that meet new industry requirements swiftly."

"I would rate the stability a four out of ten. It's an area that could use improvement"

"Customers need to be better educated about using the solution's cloud for digital transformation."

"They should probably offer more cloud services. Most of the cloud infrastructure providers we have make everything pretty transparent, you know what you're getting, you have all these metrics and measurements and everything in the dashboard. Here you have to go through the contracting negotiations and all those things."

"Perhaps minor changes to the enterprise structure could be made, but the rest is fine."

More SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of using Amazon Bedrock is quite high, as I incurred unexpected charges amounting to $130 USD within two weeks without actually deploying the model."

"One customer paid around $100 to $200 per month, which was significant given their overall infrastructure costs."

"The product itself is relatively expensive."

"The price is high compared to other databases, which is why HANA is still not widely used. Some enterprises prefer Sybase, Oracle, or other traditional databases because HANA is a little pricey. Cost is one factor SAP needs to work on to make it more competitive with other databases. Otherwise, they'll never be able to develop a mass customer base."

"Our pricing is based on a yearly contract."

"The pricing is reasonable when compared to other vendors like Oracle who offer technology enterprise resource software."

"If you choose the minimum, it will probably cost around $1,000 USD per month if you take a contract for a year or two."

"The licensing of the solution is on a yearly basis. The normal price of the solution is quite high, but I received a special discount by making a purchase near the end of the year."

"The price is expensive compared to the competition."

"SAP may not be the most cost-effective option, but it does offer a comprehensive set of tools and features. When you have the right information, structure, and dashboard in place, it can provide excellent value. Additionally, competition with Oracle might be a factor to consider."

More SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

Manufacturing Company

20%

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Bedrock?

The pricing depends on the LLM model in use, such as the 1.2 Anthropic Claude ( /products/claude-reviews ). Costs are based on the number of characters obtained in return. It follows a pay-as-you-g...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Bedrock?

AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-reviews ) could add prompt engineering methods to its services. Currently, there are no prompt methods, so we have to experiment on our own. If AWS provided methods, like...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon Bedrock?

We are using Amazon Bedrock ( /products/amazon-bedrock-reviews ) for generative AI-related tasks. We utilize Anthropic Claude ( /products/claude-reviews ) LLM to obtain appropriate answers for user...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud?

It has significantly streamlined our operations.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud?

SAP HANA Cloud can be quite costly compared to other solutions. The high licensing costs make it an expensive option, particularly for smaller customers. However, they offer solutions for mid-sized...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud?

SAP should adopt more rapid changes in market processes and customer needs to deliver solutions that meet new industry requirements swiftly. SAP finance needs to be more advanced to keep up with cu...

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Amazon Bedrock

Compared 29% of the time

Google Vertex AI vs Amazon Bedrock

Compared 19% of the time

GroqCloud Platform vs Amazon Bedrock

Compared 14% of the time

NVIDIA DGX Cloud vs Amazon Bedrock

Compared 11% of the time

Alibaba Cloud vs Amazon Bedrock

Compared 10% of the time

More Amazon Bedrock Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Compared 42% of the time

Amazon AWS vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Compared 28% of the time

SAP S4HANA on AWS vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Media Temple IaaS Cloud vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Bedrock

June 2025

Download Amazon Bedrock product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

May 2025

Download SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud product report

Overview

Amazon Bedrock enhances AI integration by providing a suite of foundational models with customization options. It simplifies data integration and offers security, traceability, and cost-efficiency through its serverless architecture.

Amazon Bedrock empowers users by offering models from multiple providers, ensuring model flexibility and ease of use. It supports quick development for applications such as vector search and SQL query generation. While the system is beneficial for AI integration and analytics enhancement, there is a desire for improved documentation, smoother integration, and more competitive pricing. Additional integration points, markdown features, and support for voice and images could enhance its use. Users also seek to optimize for hyperscale use and receive multiple responses for creative tasks.

What are the key features of Amazon Bedrock?

Security: Provides robust measures to ensure data protection.
Model Flexibility: Allows customization of foundational models.
Serverless Architecture: Offers cost-efficient, scalable resources.
Provider Access: Connects with models from different vendors.

What benefits should be considered?

Model Modification: Enables quick adjustments to suit needs.
Development Speed: Facilitates fast application development.
AI Integration: Integrates seamlessly into existing offerings.

In industries like data analytics and software development, Amazon Bedrock is implemented for tasks such as deploying large language models, performing sentiment analysis, and creating chatbots. It's used for generating AI-driven text and images, and enhancing data retrieval via SQL query generation.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is a fully scalable and secure private managed cloud solution. It empowers organizations to unlock the full value of SAP HANA in the cloud - accelerating growth and innovation, driving IT and business transformation, quickly delivering business outcomes, and reducing risk.

SAP

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

FC Bayern Munich, Reuters News Agency, MEMEBOX

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Bedrock vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

June 2025

Free Report: Amazon Bedrock vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Bedrock vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Bedrock vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud report.

See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.