Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Azure vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud comparison

Microsoft and SAP are both solutions in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while SAP is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.9. Microsoft holds a 16.6% mindshare in ISI, compared to SAP’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of SAP users who would recommend it.
Microsoft Azure
Read 316 Microsoft Azure reviews
  • 20,523 Views
  • 10,877 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud
Read 24 SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud reviews
  • 1,332 Views
  • 1,292 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 16, 2024

Microsoft Azure and SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud are both leading solutions in the cloud computing market. Azure's strength lies in its versatility and extensive global infrastructure, making it a compelling choice for businesses seeking a flexible cloud environment. Conversely, SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud stands out for its deep integration capabilities specifically tailored for SAP applications, providing an edge for enterprises dependent on the SAP ecosystem.

Features: Microsoft Azure provides comprehensive integration with various programming languages and frameworks, extensive global data centers enhancing customer proximity, and a robust PaaS platform. It also includes reliable distributed caching and scalability, addressing the needs of large organizations and developers. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud excels in offering a secure, managed environment for SAP workloads with seamless SAP application integration, which is vital for organizations with significant SAP investments.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure could enhance its pricing transparency, improve debugging tools and integration capabilities for non-Microsoft platforms. Additionally, security in multitenant settings and complex cost estimates need attention. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud requires improvement in customization flexibility, cost management, and data center localization. Enhancing update and configuration flexibility would also benefit users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure is praised for its deployment ease due to extensive documentation and public cloud reach. However, its customer service quality can vary, although business-tier support is often reliable. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud focuses on strong SAP-specific deployment support, which is generally effective but potentially expensive, offering integrated deployment dedicated to SAP suite challenges. This suggests a balance between Azure's broader support and SAP's dedicated enterprise support.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure offers competitive pricing with flexible pay-as-you-go options, yet costs may rise with increased use and complex pricing models can lead to unexpected expenses. Its ROI is strengthened by eliminating physical infrastructure needs and enabling scalable cost-efficient solutions. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud provides substantial SAP-integrated value, albeit at higher costs with annual contract structures and additional integration fees, making it favorable for large enterprises.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure
Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
316
Ranking in other categories
PaaS Clouds (1st)
SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud
Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
13th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure is 16.6%, down from 18.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is 1.7%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Nicolas Chabrier - PeerSpot reviewer
Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration
The only thing is regarding the management of multi-cloud environments. That's not really possible. So basically, it's wonderful if you manage Microsoft clearly and if you manage Microsoft Azure, but if you need to consume external services and have a global overview of all your consumption, it's not the case. Google, for instance, has tools that help you manage multiple environments, which makes sense because Google is really the cloud provider. So that's why they need to be compliant with the others. But for sure, Microsoft's approach is different, and it's wonderful when you're one hundred percent on Azure. But if you'd like to have something more of a multi-cloud strategy, that's a bit of a gap where they could improve.
Read full review
Rajnikant Verma - PeerSpot reviewer
Real-time data processing and good support with room for market-driven improvements
SAP RFX and overall SAP solutions provide a very intuitive and integrated solution within finance, leading procurement, and other business scenarios. The real-time data processing and the ability to track all leasing processes and contracts are particularly valuable. SAP's capability to integrate with other systems like GIS and non-SAP applications also stands out.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The pricing is quite good, and it is designed as pay-per-use."
"The solution has given us more agility, scalability and opportunity to optimize the cost."
"I have found the solution to be flexible, easy to use, and the documents are straightforward to understand."
"Offers many data security features including securing network access."
"The solution is very simple to set up."
"Much more intuitive and more visual than AWS. More obvious where things are and how to change their configurations, etc."
"Microsoft Azure has proven to be beneficial for our organization due to its quick deployment capabilities. Setting up virtual machines or any required infrastructure is fast."
"Infrastructure as a service is most valuable."
More Microsoft Azure pros
"The most valuable feature is virtual modeling, which is beneficial because you don't really save the data multiple times the way we did in the past."
"The interface is easy to manage."
"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"We have a wide range of use cases for SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud. These include production planning, materials management, sales management, treasury, finance, appliance maintenance, real estate, and warehouse management."
"The solution is stable and we have never had a problem. We started with one terabyte of data when the solution was first implemented and today we have around almost 600 gigabytes of data, which means means the compression works properly. Before migrating from ECC, we had nine terabytes of data."
"It is a stable and scalable product."
"It is a scalable solution if you have a good cloud infrastructure."
"The real-time data processing and the ability to track all leasing processes and contracts are particularly valuable."
More SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud pros
 

Cons

"There are so many services available that the interface is a little bit messy, and when you're looking for a specific service, you have to know exactly where to search."
"There are times when using a service in Microsoft Azure can be confusing because you have four or five options that do similar operations. It would be helpful if there was a clear decision tree around those features. Microsoft does provide a lot of decision trees around a lot of their services, but it's not for everything."
"You eventually end up with a large collection of 'bits' all working together, I find it hard to be able to create a logical 'box' and put all the 'bits' that need to be in that box / application into the one place."
"One key area for improvement is the Azure load balancer. Currently, it only supports virtual machines (VMs) running in the same virtual network (vNet) on the backend. They should definitely support machines or IPs running on-premises (prem) or in other Azure VNets. GCP and AWS already support that. So, Azure Load Balancer should support that as well"
"The price of the Azure license could be cheaper."
"Pricing is high if you plan to use it on a larger scale."
"Azure does not handle scalability as well as its competitors. Sometimes a 10 percent increase in a server with 20 percent of CPU usage pushes the server up to 100 percent load, and you start having performance issues."
"Microsoft should have one package for all their solutions in one place to be found."
More Microsoft Azure cons
"The product must provide more details of the errors."
"SAP should adopt more rapid changes in market processes and customer needs to deliver solutions that meet new industry requirements swiftly."
"The customer has a lot of dependencies on SAP which means they don't have much flexibility to go and update the system when or if they need to. They will need to wait for the quarterly updates. It's possible to maybe raise a special request with SAP if it is absolutely necessary."
"Customers need to be better educated about using the solution's cloud for digital transformation."
"Perhaps minor changes to the enterprise structure could be made, but the rest is fine."
"It’s a common challenge with applications like Microsoft and SAP that they tend to rely on engineers rather than human resources personnel for knowledge and implementation."
"Our data centers are in Europe and come under GDPR regulations, and this doesn't apply to the Middle East yet. It causes a lot of confusion."
"SAP support isn't on par with products like Microsoft Azure or AWS. It's nowhere close to the competitors."
More SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing costs for Enterprise are on an annual basis."
"The price of the solution can be expensive."
"Most of the pricing from Microsoft is reasonable."
"The price of the solution is reasonable."
"The pricing of the solution could be reduced. We are not able to create a free account in my country."
"One piece of feedback from other users I have heard from is that Azure is somewhat expensive, so I would advise anyone thinking about this solution to be aware of the cost. You need to take into account the configuration you are going with or it could turn out to be a more expensive solution than you anticipated."
"The price of the solution is reasonable."
"Make use of Azure pricing calculator and you will find out that Azure Is still more reasonable that the competition and do your research, when unclear speak with your MS support."
More Microsoft Azure pricing and cost advice
"It's very, very expensive."
"The price is expensive compared to the competition."
"The product itself is relatively expensive."
"If you choose the minimum, it will probably cost around $1,000 USD per month if you take a contract for a year or two."
"Our pricing is based on a yearly contract."
"The solution could be less expensive."
"The licensing of the solution is on a yearly basis. The normal price of the solution is quite high, but I received a special discount by making a purchase near the end of the year."
"The price is high compared to other databases, which is why HANA is still not widely used. Some enterprises prefer Sybase, Oracle, or other traditional databases because HANA is a little pricey. Cost is one factor SAP needs to work on to make it more competitive with other databases. Otherwise, they'll never be able to develop a mass customer base."
More SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user8586 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 14, 2013
Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison
Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…
Read full review
 

Answers from the Community

HS
Sep 21, 2021
Sep 21, 2021
SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud (HEC): how to migrate to Microsoft Azure?
Hi, It could be easy as Azure is one of the partners of SAP HEC. Please contact your SAP HEC technical account manager who can guide you on this.
2 out of 3 answers
EB
Aug 3, 2021
Hi @Abdul-Rasool, @RamakrishnanRamanathaiah and @Ramakrishna Potluri. It seems you should be able to provide some assistance to @Harraj Saraon with this question.
Read full answer
MB
Aug 5, 2021
@Harraj Saraon, ​did you get your answer?
Read full answer
See all 3 answers
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
University
6%
Manufacturing Company
22%
Computer Software Company
13%
University
8%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is preferable - IBM Public Cloud or Microsoft Azure?
IBM Public Cloud is IBM’s Platform-as-a-Service. It aims to provide organizations with a secure cloud environment to manage data and applications. One of the features we like is the cloud activity ...
See all answers
Which is better - SAP Cloud Platform or Microsoft Azure?
One of the best features of SAP Cloud Platform is that it is web-based and you can log in from anywhere in the world. SAP Cloud Platform is suitable for companies of any size; it works well with bo...
See all answers
How does Microsoft Azure compare to Google Firebase?
I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure...
See all answers
What do you like most about SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud?
It has significantly streamlined our operations.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud?
SAP HANA Cloud can be quite costly compared to other solutions. The high licensing costs make it an expensive option, particularly for smaller customers. However, they offer solutions for mid-sized...
See all answers
What needs improvement with SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud?
When discussing migration projects with SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud, one issue they face concerns the satellite systems - systems that have connections with their SAP. However, this has improved as S...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Alibaba Cloud vs Microsoft Azure Logo
Alibaba Cloud vs Microsoft Azure
Compared 12% of the time
Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Microsoft Azure Logo
Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Microsoft Azure
Compared 9% of the time
Amazon AWS vs Microsoft Azure Logo
Amazon AWS vs Microsoft Azure
Compared 9% of the time
Red Hat OpenShift vs Microsoft Azure Logo
Red Hat OpenShift vs Microsoft Azure
Compared 9% of the time
Google App Engine vs Microsoft Azure Logo
Google App Engine vs Microsoft Azure
Compared 2% of the time
More Microsoft Azure Competitors
Amazon AWS vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud Logo
Amazon AWS vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud
Compared 28% of the time
SAP S4HANA on AWS vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud Logo
SAP S4HANA on AWS vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud
Compared 14% of the time
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud Logo
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud
Compared 7% of the time
Media Temple IaaS Cloud vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud Logo
Media Temple IaaS Cloud vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud
Compared 5% of the time
Google Cloud vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud Logo
Google Cloud vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud
Compared 5% of the time
More SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure
August 2025
Microsoft Azure reportDownload Microsoft Azure product report
Buyer's Guide
SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud
July 2025
SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud reportDownload SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud product report
 

Also Known As

Windows Azure, Azure, MS Azure
No data available
 

Overview

Microsoft Azure integrates services and offers flexibility, ensuring compatibility with diverse environments. Its scalability, security, and cost-efficient features enhance deployment and management, making it ideal for infrastructure services and application hosting.

Azure provides a comprehensive suite of tools for application deployment, virtual machine management, and data analytics. It allows seamless integration with Power BI and offers a user-friendly interface supported by detailed documentation and technical support. Though users appreciate its capabilities, they sometimes face challenges with costs, setup, and interface complexity, alongside integration and performance issues. Frequent updates and a learning curve are also noted, though Azure's cloud-based security and scalability remain critical for disaster recovery and business continuity.

What are Azure's key features?
  • Integrated Services: Ensures compatibility with Microsoft and non-Microsoft environments.
  • Scalability: Supports growing business demands with flexible computing power.
  • Security: Offers robust cloud-based security features for data protection.
  • Cost Efficiency: Provides options that optimize costs for diverse requirements.
  • Application Deployment: Facilitates quick rollout of apps and services.
What benefits should users expect from Azure?
  • Operational Optimization: Allows companies to streamline processes effectively.
  • Innovative Efficiency: Empowers businesses to innovate with powerful tools.
  • Reliable Support: Backed by strong technical support and comprehensive documentation.
  • Flexible Cloud Solutions: Offers a range of options for cloud migrations and infrastructure management.

Microsoft Azure is widely implemented in industries like financial services, healthcare, and logistics for hosting enterprise applications and vital services. Companies utilize its capabilities for IoT applications, DevOps, and Kubernetes clusters, benefiting from its cloud migrations, data analytics, and active directory support.

Microsoft

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is a fully scalable and secure private managed cloud solution. It empowers organizations to unlock the full value of SAP HANA in the cloud - accelerating growth and innovation, driving IT and business transformation, quickly delivering business outcomes, and reducing risk.

SAP
 

Sample Customers

BMW, Toyota, easyJet, NBC Sports, HarperCollins, Aviva, TalkTalk Business, Avanade, and Telenor.
FC Bayern Munich, Reuters News Agency, MEMEBOX
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud
July 2025
Free Report: Microsoft Azure vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Microsoft Azure vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.