Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Mimecast Incydr Logo

Top 10 Mimecast Incydr Alternatives

Vendor: Mimecast
4.5 out of 5
690 followers
Start review

Top Mimecast Incydr Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Mimecast Incydr based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform, Varonis Platform, and Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Mimecast Incydr surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat protection, data loss prevention, and seamless integration with cloud applications, empowering businesses with comprehensive security solutions and unmatched user-friendly features.

Mimecast Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Mimecast, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Mimecast Incydr Logo
Mimecast Incydr Logo
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform
4.2 out of 5
Mimecast Incydr attracts those seeking effective pricing with robust support through email security and threat intelligence integration. In comparison, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange offers higher costs but delivers extensive security features through its zero trust architecture and cloud integration.
Download Mimecast Incydr vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Report
Mimecast Incydr involves lower setup costs compared to the Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform, highlighting a cost-effective option for businesses focusing on budget-friendly solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Mimecast Incydr involves lower setup costs compared to the Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform, highlighting a cost-effective option for businesses focusing on budget-friendly solutions.
Mimecast Incydr Logo
Varonis Platform
4.1 out of 5
Mimecast Incydr Logo
Varonis Platform
4.1 out of 5
Mimecast Incydr excels in affordability and faster deployment with responsive support, perfect for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Varonis Platform's comprehensive features and data protection capabilities attract those seeking advanced security, despite higher costs and a longer setup process.
Download Mimecast Incydr vs. Varonis Platform Report
Mimecast Incydr offers competitive setup costs, while Varonis Platform involves a higher initial investment. The pricing contrast highlights the affordability of Mimecast Incydr and the premium nature of Varonis Platform.
View comparison
Pricing
Mimecast Incydr offers competitive setup costs, while Varonis Platform involves a higher initial investment. The pricing contrast highlights the affordability of Mimecast Incydr and the premium nature of Varonis Platform.
Mimecast Incydr Logo
Mimecast Incydr Logo
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
3.9 out of 5
Mimecast Incydr excels with real-time data tracking and insider threat detection, appealing to smaller organizations with its straightforward deployment. In comparison, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention offers extensive integrations and analytics within Microsoft's ecosystem, beneficial for clients seeking comprehensive long-term ROI.
Download Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs. Mimecast Incydr Report
Mimecast Incydr typically incurs higher initial setup costs due to its comprehensive suite of features, while Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention generally offers a more cost-effective initial setup, appealing to businesses with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Mimecast Incydr typically incurs higher initial setup costs due to its comprehensive suite of features, while Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention generally offers a more cost-effective initial setup, appealing to businesses with budget constraints.
Mimecast Incydr Logo
Mimecast Incydr Logo
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
4.0 out of 5
Mimecast Incydr appeals to tech buyers with its focus on data monitoring, rapid response, and cost-effective cloud integration. In comparison, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention attracts those seeking robust content inspection, advanced analytics, flexible deployment options, and long-term ROI benefits.
Download Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Mimecast Incydr Report
Mimecast Incydr has a competitive setup cost, while Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention tends to have higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Mimecast Incydr has a competitive setup cost, while Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention tends to have higher initial expenses.
Mimecast Incydr Logo
Mimecast Incydr Logo
Symantec Data Loss Prevention
4.0 out of 5
Mimecast Incydr is known for its cost-effectiveness and seamless deployment, while Symantec Data Loss Prevention offers comprehensive features and granular data control. In comparison, Mimecast excels in support and deployment speed. Symantec justifies its cost with robust data protection measures.
Download Mimecast Incydr vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention Report
Mimecast Incydr offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, whereas Symantec Data Loss Prevention involves a more complex setup and potentially higher initial expenses, highlighting a distinct difference in their setup investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Mimecast Incydr offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, whereas Symantec Data Loss Prevention involves a more complex setup and potentially higher initial expenses, highlighting a distinct difference in their setup investment requirements.
Mimecast Incydr Logo
Digital Guardian
3.7 out of 5
Mimecast Incydr Logo
Digital Guardian
3.7 out of 5
Mimecast Incydr emphasizes simple integration and cost-effectiveness, appealing to those seeking easy setup and email protection. In comparison, Digital Guardian offers extensive data loss prevention and security features, attracting tech buyers needing thorough data protection despite higher initial costs and complex deployment.
Download Digital Guardian vs. Mimecast Incydr Report
Mimecast Incydr offers an affordable setup cost, while Digital Guardian features a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Mimecast Incydr offers an affordable setup cost, while Digital Guardian features a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
Mimecast Incydr Logo
Mimecast Incydr Logo
Netwrix Endpoint Protector
4.2 out of 5
Mimecast Incydr excels in pricing and customer support, appealing to organizations focused on email and data security. In comparison, Netwrix Endpoint Protector offers superior features like advanced encryption and multi-OS support, attracting those willing to invest in comprehensive data protection for robust ROI.
Download Mimecast Incydr vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector Report
Mimecast Incydr incurs higher initial setup costs, while Netwrix Endpoint Protector is more budget-friendly for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Mimecast Incydr incurs higher initial setup costs, while Netwrix Endpoint Protector is more budget-friendly for initial deployment.
Mimecast Incydr Logo
Mimecast Incydr Logo
Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
4.1 out of 5
Mimecast Incydr offers cost-effective options with strong email protection and quick deployment, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Netskope DLP's comprehensive data visibility and granular controls justify its higher price, attracting organizations needing advanced cloud security features.
Download Mimecast Incydr vs. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Report
Mimecast Incydr incurs lower setup costs compared to Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP), highlighting a more economical initial expenditure for users. Netskope's higher setup costs may reflect its advanced features and comprehensive data loss prevention capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Mimecast Incydr incurs lower setup costs compared to Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP), highlighting a more economical initial expenditure for users. Netskope's higher setup costs may reflect its advanced features and comprehensive data loss prevention capabilities.
Mimecast Incydr Logo
Cyberhaven
1 out of 5
Mimecast Incydr Logo
Cyberhaven
1 out of 5
Mimecast Incydr appeals with its seamless deployment and cost-effective pricing. In comparison, Cyberhaven attracts with advanced data visibility and tracing. Mimecast is ideal for rapid integration in simpler environments, while Cyberhaven suits enterprises needing detailed data insights despite higher costs.
Mimecast Incydr has a lower setup cost, while Cyberhaven's setup cost is relatively higher due to advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Mimecast Incydr has a lower setup cost, while Cyberhaven's setup cost is relatively higher due to advanced features.
Mimecast Incydr Logo
Teramind
1 out of 5
Mimecast Incydr Logo
Teramind
1 out of 5
Mimecast Incydr excels in ease of deployment and customer service, ideal for businesses needing quick implementation. In comparison, Teramind offers superior features and a higher ROI, appealing to those requiring extensive monitoring and productivity analysis despite higher initial setup costs.
Mimecast Incydr has a minimal setup cost, offering a straightforward deployment, whereas Teramind incurs a higher initial expense, reflecting its extensive configuration options and comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Mimecast Incydr has a minimal setup cost, offering a straightforward deployment, whereas Teramind incurs a higher initial expense, reflecting its extensive configuration options and comprehensive feature set.
Mimecast Incydr Logo
Mimecast Incydr Logo
Proofpoint Enterprise DLP
1 out of 5
Mimecast Incydr offers streamlined incident response and affordability. In comparison, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP provides advanced data tracking and classification, which appeals to tech buyers focusing on comprehensive security features, while Mimecast attracts those looking for quick setup and responsive customer support.
Mimecast Incydr incurs higher setup costs, while Proofpoint Enterprise DLP offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Mimecast Incydr incurs higher setup costs, while Proofpoint Enterprise DLP offers a more budget-friendly setup.

Related categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)
Application Control