Mimecast Incydr vs Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) comparison

Mimecast Incydr vs. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Download the complete report

Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Mimecast Incydr

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

25th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Netskope Data Loss Preventi...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

18th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Mimecast Incydr is 1.7%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is 3.4%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Chuck_Mackey

Director, Cybersecurity Consulting at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Provides comprehensive visibility and protection, helps in identifying the gaps in security, and comes with excellent onboarding support

In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue. It really has to do with the overall infrastructure and what the organization is prepared to do. If the infrastructure or the networking is a little hinky or you don't have a really finely tuned network infrastructure environment and your patches aren't up to date on your servers and your endpoints, it could get a little sticky. Other than that, it was okay. We really didn't have much problem beyond that. It took a couple of days to sort that out, but it was no big deal.

Read full review

ToddMcAlister

Lead Application and Data Security Engineer at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Flexible, provides insights into the infrastructure, and monitors movement of files effectively

The product is flexible. It takes care of our cloud infrastructure. The tool meets our needs. The normal compliance policies work well. The behavior analysis features give us insight into what is going on in the network. The tool has been pretty effective in monitoring the files that are being moved. The network integration has been fine.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Code42 Next-Gen DLP is scalable."

"There are a couple of things. One of them is that they have what they call Incydr. Their detection and response solution to the insider threat area is called Incydr. That gives visibility to the clients that have widely dispersed employee bases due to work from home, or that had a dispersed workforce predating any of the work from home requirements. Even though they might not be inside the organization physically, they're inside the organization. It allows us to get some visibility into what people are doing, what the context is, and how to control what might be the potential for intellectual property theft or file exposure."

"The solution is very stable. Very rarely do we have any issues with it. We don't have to deal with bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. We find it to be reliable."

"It had the ability to preseed by sending in a data drive and could restore by sending the user a data drive."

"It has quite a bit of flexibility in configuring backup sets."

"Risk factors can be adjusted for all intricate details."

"It required very little ongoing maintenance once setup."

"Security tools: Being able to monitor data going in and coming off our endpoints. Seeing what it is and where it's going is awesome."

More Mimecast Incydr pros

"The product is flexible."

"The product provides visibility to manage sensitive data and control access."

"The Real-Time Analytics and Reporting capabilities of Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) are good and up to the mark."

"I find Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) easier and more appealing than Zscaler."

Cons

"I think one we can improve is the compression."

"I would like to see more flexibility on privileges, perhaps create another kind of admin for regions. Also, I would like the ability to access logs without having to be on the actual device or a super-admin."

"The application, written in Java, required far more system resources on a Client than other solutions."

"There doesn't seem to be any feature that is lacking."

"What I think could be improved is how I get support."

"In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue."

"More security would be nice, I would love to be able to remotely brick a stolen laptop and it's hard disk drive (HDD)."

"Java, please get rid of Java."

More Mimecast Incydr cons

"I rate the pricing a seven out of ten. The pricing is moderate."

"The product should be compatible with multiple file formats."

"I have not seen any benefits from this real-time analysis at this time."

"Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) can be improved primarily because we were looking for any other provider due to the ZTNA feature that we were scoping from Netskope."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is reasonable. It's my understanding that the cost is about $7 for unlimited storage in the cloud per server."

"It was expensive. It was more expensive than Eureka, and it was more expensive than Barracuda Backup, but what we got was a full team. They didn't come in and nickel and dime us. They provided the assistance we needed. They didn't say that they need to charge us for something or it is going to take another statement of work. It was all bundled into it... We pay for the software maintenance. It is probably 18% or 20% of the license fee for rev releases."

"It is 100% worth the cost to get and keep the support, especially when setting it up."

"They were the best solution and surprisingly enough, the cheapest."

"It used to be a good solution for SOHO in particular as it had unlimited storage for a reasonable price. However, their pricing model has changed and they are now primarily targeting enterprise users."

"The pricing is moderate."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for Code42 Incydr?

Data Leakage Protection on large scale environments. This can be to protect against leakage on endpoints and servers that consist of highly classified or propriety information. It can be added on a...

What do you like most about Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

The product provides visibility to manage sensitive data and control access.

What needs improvement with Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

I will still have to explore Zscaler, so I cannot comment on it at this time. We are currently working on the DLP part, and I believe it will be functional, but we will have to evaluate its perform...

What is your primary use case for Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

I have started using Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) for about five months. I use Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and Zscaler for the CASB-based and private access; users will be logged int...

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Incydr

Comparisons

Compared 15% of the time

Digital Guardian vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 9% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 8% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 7% of the time

Cyberhaven vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 7% of the time

More Mimecast Incydr Competitors

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 20% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 15% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 12% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 11% of the time

Trellix DLP vs Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 6% of the time

More Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Competitors

Product Reports

Mimecast Incydr

Download Mimecast Incydr product report

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Download Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) product report

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) report

Also Known As

Code42 Next-Gen DLP, Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection, Code42 Forensic File Search, Code42 Backup + Restore

No data available

Overview

Mimecast Incydr offers a comprehensive data protection and recovery solution, ideal for organizations needing robust insider threat protection and regulatory compliance.

Mimecast Incydr provides a seamless experience across platforms with lightweight clients and centralized administration. It focuses on real-time monitoring, instant access to backups, strong encryption, and customizable risk scoring. This ensures data protection against insider threats while promoting ease of use and low system overhead. Although improvements are possible in areas like Java dependency reduction, GUI design, cloud storage integration, and comprehensive reporting, Mimecast Incydr remains valuable for data classification, legal discovery, and identity management, especially for large environments handling classified information.

What key features does Mimecast Incydr offer?

Lightweight Clients: Ensures minimal system impact
Version Backups: Keeps data secure with historical availability
Seamless Data Recovery: Provides instant access to critical data
Multi-Platform Compatibility: Operates across diverse systems
Strong Encryption: Protects sensitive information
Customizable Risk Scoring: Tailors threat assessment to needs
Flexible Storage Options: Supports continuous backup capabilities

What benefits or ROI should be considered?

Ease of Use: Simplifies deployment and management
Regulatory Compliance: Aids adherence to industry standards
Centralized Administration: Streamlines management processes
Low System Overhead: Minimizes resource consumption
Real-Time Monitoring: Facilitates prompt threat response

Mimecast Incydr is leveraged across industries for data leakage protection and egress solution integration. It supports HIPAA-compliant backups and peer-to-peer data management, proving invaluable for corporate data protection and traveling employees facing data loss risks. Its application in legal data discovery and disaster recovery planning enhances its relevance for IT administrators and compliance officers managing data-intensive operations.

Mimecast

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) offers advanced protection against sensitive data loss with robust features tailored for enterprise security needs, providing seamless integration and efficiency in monitoring data across cloud platforms.

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) helps organizations safeguard their sensitive information by providing comprehensive data visibility and control. It addresses key needs such as compliance and IT security with its contextual understanding of data movements. It delivers flexible policy creation, which enhances data protection across all digital touchpoints. Adaptive machine learning capabilities allow precise identification and prevention of data leaks, ensuring that enterprises can confidently protect their data in real-time. The tool is highly regarded for its integration capabilities, though some users seek improvements in analytics and reporting functionalities.

What are the most important features of Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

Advanced Threat Protection: Guards against unauthorized data exfiltration.
Granular Control: Offers precise policy enforcement based on content and context.
Cloud Integration: Seamlessly embeds into cloud services enhancing data security.
Customizable Policies: Enables tailored approaches to data protection rules.
Machine Learning: Utilizes AI for improved identification of sensitive data.

What benefits or ROI can users expect from Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

Enhanced Compliance: Assists in adhering to data protection regulations.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces data breach-related expenses through proactive measures.
Risk Management: Identifies vulnerabilities and mitigates risks effectively.
Data Visibility: Provides clear insights into data flows and storage locations.

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is deployed across industries like healthcare, finance, and technology. In healthcare, it ensures patient data protection, supporting HIPAA compliance. Finance organizations benefit from its rigorous security controls for safeguarding financial records. For technology companies, it secures intellectual property against unauthorized access and leakage.

Netskope

Sample Customers

Adobe, Okta, Samsung, Taylormade, Boston University, Lending Club, North Highland, Stanford University, Ping Identity, Qualcomm, Pandora.

Information Not Available

Mimecast Incydr vs. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)