It is very cheap if you forego the local instance and stick to the cloud.
The licensing model is annoying. They nickel and dime you.
It is very cheap if you forego the local instance and stick to the cloud.
The licensing model is annoying. They nickel and dime you.
I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month.
The price is okay.
I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month.
The price is okay.
The cost is high, but it still works well.
We went with product because we have a subscription for Red Hat.
The cost is high, but it still works well.
We went with product because we have a subscription for Red Hat.
It's just as expensive as HPE ALM, without many of the features, best used for development tool only to avoid higher costs.
TFS is on the higher side, but if you intend to use the tool as a complete ALM tool, it will reduce your costs in the long run.
It's just as expensive as HPE ALM, without many of the features, best used for development tool only to avoid higher costs.
TFS is on the higher side, but if you intend to use the tool as a complete ALM tool, it will reduce your costs in the long run.
Quality Center is pricey, but cheaper is not always less expensive.
I'd rate the pricing as 3/10 as it's very expensive.
Quality Center is pricey, but cheaper is not always less expensive.
I'd rate the pricing as 3/10 as it's very expensive.
The price of this solution makes it quite accessible, and the plans fit my budget.
It has a free version.
The price of this solution makes it quite accessible, and the plans fit my budget.
It has a free version.
The concurrent licensing model is good. Also, the license-sharing with ALM.NET is a good option for us.
Going forward, I think we will want to explore adding more licenses.
The concurrent licensing model is good. Also, the license-sharing with ALM.NET is a good option for us.
Going forward, I think we will want to explore adding more licenses.
It is a little expensive. We are in Brazil, and for us, it is a little expensive.
The cost of the solution should not be more than $50,000 annually.
It is a little expensive. We are in Brazil, and for us, it is a little expensive.
The cost of the solution should not be more than $50,000 annually.
Frankly, pricing is expensive and needs to be carefully planned for when budgeting.
The license costs are fairly high as compared to some of the other solutions out there.
Frankly, pricing is expensive and needs to be carefully planned for when budgeting.
The license costs are fairly high as compared to some of the other solutions out there.
The license model is okay for large companies but would be quite expensive for smaller enterprises.
If the pricing would come down and it was more affordable then we wouldn't have to switch.
The license model is okay for large companies but would be quite expensive for smaller enterprises.
If the pricing would come down and it was more affordable then we wouldn't have to switch.
I think it can be more cost-effective.
The pricing was quite competitive and a lot lower compared to other solutions. It wasn't cheap, but it was not as expensive.
I think it can be more cost-effective.
The pricing was quite competitive and a lot lower compared to other solutions. It wasn't cheap, but it was not as expensive.
The cost seems very competitive with other offerings.
If you want to have creative licenses, pricing may be an issue with the licenses, as it can become quite expensive over time to serve many people.
The cost seems very competitive with other offerings.
If you want to have creative licenses, pricing may be an issue with the licenses, as it can become quite expensive over time to serve many people.
The license for Jira Align is priced fairly.
Jira Align is quite expensive for small-to-medium companies, but it's quite reasonable for larger ones.
The license for Jira Align is priced fairly.
Jira Align is quite expensive for small-to-medium companies, but it's quite reasonable for larger ones.
Pricing is good when compared to similar ALM solutions.
It is reasonably priced and in accordance with the industry standards.
Pricing is good when compared to similar ALM solutions.
It is reasonably priced and in accordance with the industry standards.
The licensing fees for this solution are based on the number of servers that are being deployed and the number of agents that you have.
Considering COVID-19, the price is too high.
The licensing fees for this solution are based on the number of servers that are being deployed and the number of agents that you have.
Considering COVID-19, the price is too high.
The product is expensive.
The product is expensive.
This solution has a comparable pricing in comparison to other similar products on the market.
The pricing continues to get higher.
This solution has a comparable pricing in comparison to other similar products on the market.
The pricing continues to get higher.
When we're rolling out a new server, we're not using the AWS Marketplace AMI, we're using our own AMI, but we are paying them a licensing fee.
We are using the free, open source version of the software, which we are happy with at this time.
When we're rolling out a new server, we're not using the AWS Marketplace AMI, we're using our own AMI, but we are paying them a licensing fee.
We are using the free, open source version of the software, which we are happy with at this time.
In general, Planview's cost structure is reasonable. You get quite a lot of functionality for the license cost that you get.
I don't believe there are any costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.
In general, Planview's cost structure is reasonable. You get quite a lot of functionality for the license cost that you get.
I don't believe there are any costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.
It's an open-source and free tool.
This is an open-source solution and it is inexpensive.
It's an open-source and free tool.
This is an open-source solution and it is inexpensive.
You get what you pay for. Don't let your development teams dictate what the portfolio management team should use as the main tool.
Comparing the pricing to other products, I think this solution is in the middle.
You get what you pay for. Don't let your development teams dictate what the portfolio management team should use as the main tool.
Comparing the pricing to other products, I think this solution is in the middle.
There is a community edition available, but if the price were lower for the addons then more people would use the full version.
There is a community edition available, but if the price were lower for the addons then more people would use the full version.
We have a contract, but I am not aware of the details.
This product is a little expensive and we had to pay extra to have them set it up for us.
We have a contract, but I am not aware of the details.
This product is a little expensive and we had to pay extra to have them set it up for us.
Licensing: The solution cost is high and should be brought down to increase competition.
It's an expensive investment to make, so the decision should be driven on individual requirements.
Licensing: The solution cost is high and should be brought down to increase competition.
It's an expensive investment to make, so the decision should be driven on individual requirements.
Overall, the price is just too high; especially considering we're in the middle of a pandemic.
The solution's license includes all features.
Overall, the price is just too high; especially considering we're in the middle of a pandemic.
The solution's license includes all features.
Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive.
Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive.
The pricing was excellent. I would recommend the enterprise solution.
I Googled the pricing for Inflectra SpiraTest, and it's about $4,000 annually.
The pricing was excellent. I would recommend the enterprise solution.
I Googled the pricing for Inflectra SpiraTest, and it's about $4,000 annually.
We increased our quality and reduced our time costs.
I can save time and money more quickly.
We increased our quality and reduced our time costs.
I can save time and money more quickly.
Nolio is a pretty much good tool, though its pricing is relatively high in the market. It's more expensive than other tools.
Nolio is a pretty much good tool, though its pricing is relatively high in the market. It's more expensive than other tools.
Pricing costs are based on annual subscriptions.
The product’s pricing is acceptable. We get volume discounts.
Pricing costs are based on annual subscriptions.
The product’s pricing is acceptable. We get volume discounts.
It is a lower cost than other top competetors.
It is a lower cost than other top competetors.
There is a free trial available that people can try. The solution has a subscription and it is based on the users that use the solution.
There is a free trial available that people can try. The solution has a subscription and it is based on the users that use the solution.
Spinnaker is a free-to-use, open-source solution.
Spinnaker is a free-to-use, open-source solution.
