IBM Engineering Workflow Management and Microsoft Azure DevOps are workflow and project management solutions. Azure DevOps appears to have the upper hand because of its extensive feature set and integration capabilities.
Features: IBM Engineering Workflow Management offers comprehensive planning and tracking, Jazz Source Control for isolated sandboxes, and robust change management integration. Microsoft Azure DevOps provides CI/CD pipelines, Azure Boards for agile management, and seamless integration with other Microsoft products.
Room for Improvement: IBM Engineering Workflow Management could benefit from easier deployment options, enhanced cloud capabilities, and an improved user interface. Microsoft Azure DevOps might improve by offering more customization flexibility, reducing complexity in integrations, and expanding offline capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure DevOps offers straightforward cloud-based deployment with abundant online resources, easing the onboarding process. Meanwhile, IBM Engineering Workflow Management often requires a more hands-on setup tailored to enterprise needs, potentially increasing complexity but allowing for customization.
Pricing and ROI: IBM Engineering Workflow Management may involve higher initial setup costs but offers a robust ROI through improved project oversight. Azure DevOps provides flexible pricing models with potentially lower initial costs and faster ROI due to its agile framework and modular pricing strategy.
On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the best, I would say ROI is an eight.
The technical support from IBM rates an eight out of ten.
Resolving issues took time since understanding our unique problems was not always straightforward for support teams.
I would rate technical support from Microsoft for Microsoft Azure DevOps an eight out of ten.
The scalability has left me pleased, not just for our teams in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia, but as we expanded into North America, Africa, and even Australia.
Its stability might be attributed to its legacy as an on-premise solution that has been in development for more than 25 years.
There was just one time when there was some infrastructure issue from Microsoft's side, so we faced some glitches for a few minutes only, not for hours or a day.
Everything works ninety-nine percent well.
Improved graphics in terms of metrics and connectivity to SharePoint from Microsoft products would be beneficial.
IBM Engineering Workflow Management can be improved by enhancing its pricing structure.
Those processes are a bit difficult for some customers who may not have technical knowledge and don't go through the entire documentation.
Instead of customers having to try many options themselves, they benefit from practitioner recommendations.
Enhanced system guidance highlighting best practices would be beneficial, especially if experienced personnel are not available for support.
They don't even provide a POC where you can have a sandbox or stuff that you can go through and see how exactly it's costing.
I find it to be expensive.
Azure charges only the parking cost, not for unnecessary or unwanted cost.
The capability of IBM Engineering Workflow Management in managing end-to-end workflows is quite robust, especially with the built-in change management capabilities.
It provides more efficiencies for our scrum team, ensures everyone is on the same page, and offers leadership insight into progress.
I can't approve my own request and move the code around without a review.
No organization would use just one vendor, and the goal is about what works well, is scalable, performs well, and offers a reasonable total cost of ownership.
Our company organized a training session with a certified Azure expert, which was extremely beneficial for adopting best practices during the initial three months.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Azure DevOps | 37.5% |
| IBM Engineering Workflow Management | 2.0% |
| Other | 60.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 42 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 27 |
| Large Enterprise | 69 |
IBM Engineering Workflow Management manages plans, tasks, the project status and acts as the critical link between required and delivered work. It provides flexibility to adapt to any process, which enables companies to adopt faster release cycles and manage dependencies across both small and complex development projects. This solution offers no-charge server software and flexible pricing models. It becomes a complete IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management solution—when purchased as a set of seamlessly integrated tools: IBM Engineering Workflow Management, IBM Engineering Test Management, and IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next.
Microsoft Azure DevOps is a cloud service that enables developers to collaborate on code development projects and create and deploy applications quicker than ever before. The service helps unite developers, project managers, and software development experts through a collaborative experience while using the application. For the users' convenience, Azure DevOps offers the user cloud services through Azure DevOps Services or an on-premises service using Azure DevOps Server. In addition, it supports integration with additional services and adding extensions, including the ability for the user to create their own custom extensions.
Azure DevOps provides a variety of unified features that can be accessed through their web browser or IDE client, such as:
Benefits of Microsoft Azure DevOps
Microsoft Azure DevOps offers many benefits, including:
Reviews from Real Users
Microsoft Azure DevOps stands out among its competitors for a variety of reasons. Two major ones are its ability to forecast how long each task will take and the ability for users to follow the entire development process.
PeerSpot viewers note the effectiveness of this solution. An executive chief operating officer for a cloud provider notes, “We can forecast tasks and the number of hours a task will take and can compare it with how long a task actually takes.”
Carlos H., a product and system director at SPCM, writes, “I think the most usable thing is that you can follow the whole progress of the development process. This makes it very useful for us.”
We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
