We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Jama Connect vs Microsoft Azure DevOps comparison

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Jama Connect vs. Microsoft Azure DevOps and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
565,304 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The most valuable feature is the user-friendly interface.""It is good at requirements management and test management."

More Jama Connect Pros →

"Azure is an advantage when working with other Microsoft solutions.""It is good for the purpose it is designed for. It is good for maintaining a repository of application code, creating pipelines for deploying the code, building the code, and deploying the code. It can be easily used by developers. There are no issues.""The most valuable features of this solution are the CI/CD pipeline, and the testing automation.""The simplicity is very good and the customer experience is also great.""It is possible to add third-party extensions to increase the usability of the product.""We can eliminate some of the middleman processes.""The most valuable features are continuous integration and deployment, and simplicity.""Provides agile management of projects."

More Microsoft Azure DevOps Pros →

"I have inquired about pricing for this solution but have not yet heard anything, so their response time in this regard is something that should be improved.""The initial setup could be better, it's complicated."

More Jama Connect Cons →

"The user management in the solution could improve.""The tool has a logical link between epic feature, user story, and task, but when you try to generate a report to show the delivery progress against a feature, it is not easy. To see the percentage completion for a feature or progress of any delivery, it is not easy to draw a report.""I think Azure DevOps could improve the traceability or business intelligence about the execution of DevOps processes.""They have to add more features such as schedules and more flexibility in the platform.""I would like to automate notifications on sprint planning. When we are getting to the end of sprint planning, we would be automatically notified.""The dashboards need bigger with better extensions and layouts. There isn't a workflow related to the statuses on the dashboard. It only lists the statuses. You can have one started, and once done, but everything in between is only in progress and could be in any order you want, it lacks flow.""Project management could be improved.""It should be able to handle the different types. There is ecosystems engineering, and there is software applications engineering. There is a need to bring these teams together, but the disciplines don't integrate very well, and so it won't work."

More Microsoft Azure DevOps Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost seems very competitive with other offerings."
  • More Jama Connect Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price is cheaper than Jira and some of the other competing tools."
  • "It is the least expensive product in this class."
  • "I find that the pricing is good, and it is competitive with the other vendors in the market."
  • "Microsoft Azure DevOps is free for up to five users and allows you to track a maximum of three projects."
  • "It is a subscription model and I only pay for what I use."
  • "The price of this solution is fair."
  • "With Azure, you have to pay for every user."
  • "As a Microsoft Partner, you get a discount on the pricing. Licensing costs are around $80 a month for DevOps, but for Azure, it is about $200 a month."
  • More Microsoft Azure DevOps Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
    565,304 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    It is good at requirements management and test management.
    Top Answer: 
    The initial setup could be better, it's complicated. They could be better. In my perception, they are slow to move on feature improvements.
    Top Answer: 
    We use Jama Connect for requirements management, test management, and some attempts to utilize it to store documents, despite the fact that it was not designed for that use.
    Top Answer: 
    Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalable… more »
    Top Answer: 
    TFS and Azure DevOps are different in many ways. TFS was designed for admins, and only offers incremental improvements. In addition, TFS seems complicated to use and I don’t think it has a very… more »
    Top Answer: 
    Microsoft Azure DevOps has been very good for creating pipelines, and all the solutions for creating task management for developers and for the business.
    Average Words per Review
    Average Words per Review
    Also Known As
    Azure DevOps, VSTS, Visual Studio Team Services, MS Azure DevOps
    Learn More
    Web-based requirements management application designed to help you increase collaboration, manage complexity and fuel innovation.

    Azure DevOps Services is a cloud service for collaborating on code development. It provides an integrated set of features that you access through your web browser or IDE client, including the following:

    • Git repositories for source control of your code.
    • Build and release management to support continuous integration and delivery of your apps.
    • Agile tools to support planning and tracking your work, code defects, and issues using Kanban and Scrum methods.
    • A variety of tools to test your apps, including manual/exploratory testing, load testing, and continuous testing.
    • Highly customizable dashboards for sharing progress and trends.
    • Built-in wiki for sharing information with your team.
    Learn more about Jama Connect
    Learn more about Microsoft Azure DevOps
    Sample Customers
    Deloitte, SpaceX, Omnigon, Delft University
    Alaska Airlines, Iberia Airlines, Columbia, Skype
    Top Industries
    Manufacturing Company17%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Comms Service Provider16%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Computer Software Company25%
    Energy/Utilities Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Computer Software Company26%
    Comms Service Provider19%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    Small Business34%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise47%
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise24%
    Large Enterprise49%
    Find out what your peers are saying about Jama Connect vs. Microsoft Azure DevOps and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    565,304 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Jama Connect is ranked 18th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 2 reviews while Microsoft Azure DevOps is ranked 2nd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 79 reviews. Jama Connect is rated 6.6, while Microsoft Azure DevOps is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Jama Connect writes "Reasonably priced, stable, user-friendly, and has good support ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure DevOps writes "Robust functionality, good integration, continually enhanced, and easy to scale". Jama Connect is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS, Jira, Polarion Requirements, IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation and codeBeamer ALM, whereas Microsoft Azure DevOps is most compared with Jira, GitLab, TFS, ServiceNow IT Business Management and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. See our Jama Connect vs. Microsoft Azure DevOps report.

    See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

    We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.