Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Targetprocess Logo

Targetprocess Reviews

Vendor: Apptio
4.4 out of 5

What is Targetprocess?

Featured Targetprocess reviews

Targetprocess mindshare

Product category:
As of March 2026, the mindshare of Targetprocess in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category stands at 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Targetprocess1.1%
Microsoft Azure DevOps37.4%
GitLab31.5%
Other30.0%
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

PeerResearch reports based on Targetprocess reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryEnterprise Agile Planning ToolsMar 17, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 17, 2026Download
ComparisonTargetprocess vs Microsoft Azure DevOpsMar 17, 2026Download
ComparisonTargetprocess vs GitLabMar 17, 2026Download
ComparisonTargetprocess vs ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio ManagementMar 17, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Microsoft Azure DevOps4.137.4%95%137 interviewsAdd to research
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management4.03.8%97%36 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Mar 8, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Scalability

Stability

 
Targetprocess Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Software Engineer at GE4.5I use Targetprocess to manage an Agile portfolio, linking OKRs to financials with strong customization, Jira integration, and powerful reporting. It improved visibility, agility health, cycle time, and PI outcomes. It’s stable and scalable, but pricey, lacking SSO and deeper AI.
Fleet Manager at UPS4.5I’ve used Targetprocess for 4+ years to improve agile delivery with visual boards, portfolio visibility, and seamless integrations, aligning work to strategy and boosting productivity (cycle time 97→45 days). It’s stable, scalable, affordable, but reporting and self-service configuration/AI need improvement.
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health4.5I use Targetprocess for centralized intake, workflow, and portfolio management with Jira integrations; its intuitive UI, dashboards, and reporting improve transparency, planning, and data-driven decisions while cutting costs. Downsides include dashboard lag with large datasets, confusing support, and window limits.
Senior Software Engineer at AT&T4.0I use Targetprocess to monitor our infrastructure and manage portfolio planning; its seamless integrations and customizability are valuable, though it could improve support and cost. Overall, it's stable, scalable, and has boosted productivity in our organization.