

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the best, I would say ROI is an eight.
There has been a measurable improvement in productivity of around 40 to 50% after implementing Microsoft Azure DevOps, which has allowed more time to be spent on other things.
I have seen a return on investment through faster PI planning and backlog grooming, unified views across teams and portfolios, improved capacity planning, and forecasting.
I have seen a return on investment with Targetprocess, including improvement in cycle time from 97 to 45 days by understanding the bottlenecks and flow improvements through visualization and tracking functionality.
Transparency has increased within and across our teams.
When requirements arise, they are raised and often get fixed within one or two days.
Resolving issues took time since understanding our unique problems was not always straightforward for support teams.
I would rate technical support from Microsoft for Microsoft Azure DevOps an eight out of ten.
The customer support for Targetprocess is not very proactive twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, but sometimes they are very active and helpful.
The customer support for Targetprocess is one of the best
Targetprocess customer support is great and responsive.
The scalability has left me pleased, not just for our teams in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia, but as we expanded into North America, Africa, and even Australia.
Microsoft Azure DevOps is scalable, with multiple options available to scale up the product as needed, given its Microsoft backing.
Targetprocess is scalable because it handles even huge data sets easily while maintaining its performance, being fast and reliable.
It is very highly scalable because it can handle all my organization's growth easily.
It is very scalable, handling my organization's needs in a perfect manner.
Its stability might be attributed to its legacy as an on-premise solution that has been in development for more than 25 years.
There was just one time when there was some infrastructure issue from Microsoft's side, so we faced some glitches for a few minutes only, not for hours or a day.
Microsoft Azure DevOps is definitely stable, as it is available most of the time, with very few downtimes.
Targetprocess is very stable, although when dealing with huge data sets, the dashboard seems to lag.
Targetprocess is very stable.
Those processes are a bit difficult for some customers who may not have technical knowledge and don't go through the entire documentation.
Out of the box, the solution is effective, yet with advancements in AI, it has the potential to be more intuitive.
Instead of customers having to try many options themselves, they benefit from practitioner recommendations.
I would like to see improvements in Targetprocess, particularly in AI, as it is needed to allow users to better understand and interpret data.
The cost is somewhat high, especially for small organizations working on a tight budget.
Dashboards with large data sets can cause performance lags or time-outs, and introducing more flexible, template-based RBAC configuration would be beneficial.
They don't even provide a POC where you can have a sandbox or stuff that you can go through and see how exactly it's costing.
I find it to be expensive.
Azure charges only the parking cost, not for unnecessary or unwanted cost.
The licensing cost is low and very straightforward.
the cost is not very effective, especially for small organizations working on a tight budget
The pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Targetprocess were cost-effective and relatively affordable.
Whenever something is created or deployed, it automatically triggers the automated scripts, generates reports, and updates the test cases, providing a seamless end-to-end activity.
I can't approve my own request and move the code around without a review.
Our company organized a training session with a certified Azure expert, which was extremely beneficial for adopting best practices during the initial three months.
Targetprocess has positively impacted my organization by integrating seamlessly with AWS billing data for improved cost transparency.
Targetprocess has positively impacted our organization by reducing waste through maximizing integrations, allowing us to move away from manual rate management and tracking, enabling greater visibility to portfolio change management, and enabling us to become more data-driven.
Some of the best features Targetprocess offers include business strategy alignment, resourcing information, mapping of work being executed with business outcomes, and visibility across the enterprise portfolio.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Azure DevOps | 34.7% |
| Targetprocess | 1.4% |
| Other | 63.9% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 43 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 28 |
| Large Enterprise | 68 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
Microsoft Azure DevOps offers full cycle integration with CI/CD pipelines and a user-friendly interface. It streamlines development processes and supports Agile planning, making it a versatile choice for teams focusing on software development and project management.
Azure DevOps is designed to enhance productivity with its comprehensive project management features, including task management and backlog organization. It supports automation, agile methodologies, and provides seamless integration with Microsoft products. Despite its robust functionalities, users suggest enhancements in customization, integration with external platforms like GitHub and Office 365, as well as advancements in reporting and dashboard functionalities. Azure DevOps plays a key role in CI/CD workflows, code repository management, work item tracking, and test automation, promoting collaboration across distributed teams.
What are the key features of Microsoft Azure DevOps?Microsoft Azure DevOps is widely implemented in industries focusing on software development and IT project management. It is specifically suitable for organizations that prioritize continuous integration, agile practices, and cross-team collaboration. Companies leverage Azure DevOps for managing code repositories, automating builds, and tracking work items, ensuring efficient project delivery in sectors such as technology, finance, and healthcare.
Targetprocess provides seamless Jira integration for enhanced collaboration and planning. It aids in managing workforces and portfolios efficiently, offering clear visualization across teams, and supports AI-enhanced integration with third-party tools to streamline planning processes.
Targetprocess is designed to improve cost and time management with customizable dashboards and intuitive UI. It offers effective report generation and fosters agility, reducing tool redundancy. Users find value in its comprehensive capabilities to consolidate data, perform impact assessments, and manage software backlogs efficiently. It promotes clear visualization and transparency across departments while centralizing intake and workflow management. However, some aspects like user-friendliness in its interface and better single sign-on functionality require improvements. Challenges include the need for enhanced AI capabilities, improved notification options, and more intuitive search features.
What important features define Targetprocess?Targetprocess is implemented across sectors to manage portfolio demand and streamline workflows. It is especially useful for IT management, enabling devices and infrastructure monitoring, aligning projects with strategic objectives, and facilitating Agile, ITSM, and traditional frameworks adaptation. It significantly boosts productivity and collaboration by organizing backlogs and managing resources effectively, offering robust features for centralized intake and workflow management.
We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.