Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Targetprocess comparison


Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure DevOps
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
Average Rating
Number of Reviews
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (2nd), Release Automation (1st)
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
Average Rating
Number of Reviews
Ranking in other categories
Value Stream Management Software (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure DevOps is 41.5%, up from 39.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Targetprocess is 1.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
Unique Categories:
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
Release Automation
Value Stream Management Software

Featured Reviews

Abhay Rawat - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 1, 2024
Helps improve the productivity and efficiency of development teams
The product's initial setup phase was not complex, especially since the work items are mostly descriptive, making it an area that everywhere can use easily. The CI/CD part is a bit technical. One can get a hold of the CI/CD part over a period of time, so I don't think it is a difficult task. Our company's team handled the product's rollout phase. The rollout phase was divided into parts. A single person did not carry out the rollout phase. I only took care of some of its parts. I cannot tell the exact time taken by our company to deal with the product's rollout phase.
Use Targetprocess?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are other solutions available that are open source and free, such as GitLab."
"The pricing is very competitive because of the whole development cycle by Azure DevOps. You don't have to buy and integrate several different tools."
"The cost is quite affordable."
"The solution is expensive."
"The licensing structure is good."
"This product could maybe be cheaper. My organization handled licensing, so I'm not aware of which subscription they have."
"When compared to other vendors, it is cheaper."
"Microsoft Azure DevOps is an expensive solution."
Information not available
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
792,694 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
Manufacturing Company
Financial Services Firm
Educational Organization
Financial Services Firm
Insurance Company
Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?
Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...
Which is better - TFS or Azure DevOps?
TFS and Azure DevOps are different in many ways. TFS was designed for admins, and only offers incremental improvements. In addition, TFS seems complicated to use and I don’t think it has a very fri...
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure DevOps?
Valuable features for project management and tracking in Azure DevOps include a portal displaying test results, check-in/check-out activity, and developer/tester productivity.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points

Also Known As

Azure DevOps, VSTS, Visual Studio Team Services, MS Azure DevOps
No data available

Learn More

Video not available



Sample Customers

Alaska Airlines, Iberia Airlines, Columbia, Skype
Vodafone, NHS, Infineon, Kone
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Atlassian and others in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools. Updated: June 2024.
792,694 professionals have used our research since 2012.