No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Targetprocess comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.6
Companies experience up to 50% productivity gains with Azure DevOps, finding it more effective than Excel and well-rated.
Sentiment score
8.9
Targetprocess enhanced monitoring, planning, and collaboration while reducing costs and reliance on spreadsheets through improved transparency and data integration.
On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the best, I would say ROI is an eight.
Associate Director at Grant Thornton (US)
There has been a measurable improvement in productivity of around 40 to 50% after implementing Microsoft Azure DevOps, which has allowed more time to be spent on other things.
Senior Automation Engineer at Zellis
I have seen a return on investment through faster PI planning and backlog grooming, unified views across teams and portfolios, improved capacity planning, and forecasting.
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health
I have seen a return on investment with Targetprocess, including improvement in cycle time from 97 to 45 days by understanding the bottlenecks and flow improvements through visualization and tracking functionality.
Fleet Manager at UPS
Transparency has increased within and across our teams.
Project Manager at Target
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
Microsoft Azure DevOps customer service is generally praised for responsiveness and documentation, with occasional delays in unusual cases.
Sentiment score
9.1
Targetprocess customer support is mostly praised as responsive and effective, with high ratings and occasional proactive engagement noted.
When requirements arise, they are raised and often get fixed within one or two days.
Senior Automation Engineer at Zellis
Resolving issues took time since understanding our unique problems was not always straightforward for support teams.
Project Executive at synergyc
I would rate technical support from Microsoft for Microsoft Azure DevOps an eight out of ten.
Consultant at Yara International ASA
The customer support for Targetprocess is not very proactive twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, but sometimes they are very active and helpful.
Senior Software Engineer at AT&T
The customer support for Targetprocess is one of the best
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health
Targetprocess customer support is great and responsive.
Fleet Manager at UPS
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Microsoft Azure DevOps excels in scalability, supporting diverse projects and teams with seamless collaboration and robust infrastructure.
Sentiment score
9.4
Targetprocess excels in scalability, efficiently handling growth, diverse projects, and large datasets while maintaining high performance and adaptability.
The scalability has left me pleased, not just for our teams in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia, but as we expanded into North America, Africa, and even Australia.
Project Executive at synergyc
Microsoft Azure DevOps is scalable, with multiple options available to scale up the product as needed, given its Microsoft backing.
Senior Automation Engineer at Zellis
Targetprocess is scalable because it handles even huge data sets easily while maintaining its performance, being fast and reliable.
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health
It is very highly scalable because it can handle all my organization's growth easily.
Fleet Manager at UPS
It is very scalable, handling my organization's needs in a perfect manner.
Project Manager at Target
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Microsoft Azure DevOps is highly rated for stability and reliability, with responsive support and improved communication on updates.
Sentiment score
9.2
Targetprocess is stable and reliable, though the dashboard may experience lag with large data sets.
Its stability might be attributed to its legacy as an on-premise solution that has been in development for more than 25 years.
Software Architect at RedesCDM
There was just one time when there was some infrastructure issue from Microsoft's side, so we faced some glitches for a few minutes only, not for hours or a day.
DevOps Engineer at ENTERPRISE SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LIMITED
Microsoft Azure DevOps is definitely stable, as it is available most of the time, with very few downtimes.
Senior Automation Engineer at Zellis
Targetprocess is very stable, although when dealing with huge data sets, the dashboard seems to lag.
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health
Targetprocess is very stable.
Project Manager at Target
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Azure DevOps needs improvements in integration, customization, UI, pricing, documentation, reporting, and customer support for enhanced usability.
Targetprocess needs better integration, user-friendliness, AI features, personalization, cost reduction, and performance improvements for large data dashboards.
Those processes are a bit difficult for some customers who may not have technical knowledge and don't go through the entire documentation.
Associate Director at Grant Thornton (US)
Out of the box, the solution is effective, yet with advancements in AI, it has the potential to be more intuitive.
Project Executive at synergyc
Instead of customers having to try many options themselves, they benefit from practitioner recommendations.
Founder & CEO at DevTools
I would like to see improvements in Targetprocess, particularly in AI, as it is needed to allow users to better understand and interpret data.
Fleet Manager at UPS
The cost is somewhat high, especially for small organizations working on a tight budget.
Senior Software Engineer at AT&T
Dashboards with large data sets can cause performance lags or time-outs, and introducing more flexible, template-based RBAC configuration would be beneficial.
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Azure DevOps offers competitive pricing with cost-effective options for large teams, despite some expensive testing features.
Enterprise buyers generally find Targetprocess affordable, competitive, and easy to set up, though costs may rise with extensive use.
They don't even provide a POC where you can have a sandbox or stuff that you can go through and see how exactly it's costing.
Associate Director at Grant Thornton (US)
I find it to be expensive.
Project Executive at synergyc
Azure charges only the parking cost, not for unnecessary or unwanted cost.
DevOps Engineer at ENTERPRISE SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LIMITED
The licensing cost is low and very straightforward.
Project Manager at Target
the cost is not very effective, especially for small organizations working on a tight budget
Senior Software Engineer at AT&T
The pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Targetprocess were cost-effective and relatively affordable.
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health
 

Valuable Features

Azure DevOps excels in CI/CD, integration, and lifecycle management, enhancing productivity and collaboration with seamless Microsoft tool integration.
Targetprocess enhances work management with seamless Jira integration, customization, transparency, and cost efficiency via AWS financial integration.
Whenever something is created or deployed, it automatically triggers the automated scripts, generates reports, and updates the test cases, providing a seamless end-to-end activity.
Senior Automation Engineer at Zellis
I can't approve my own request and move the code around without a review.
Associate Director at Grant Thornton (US)
Our company organized a training session with a certified Azure expert, which was extremely beneficial for adopting best practices during the initial three months.
Project Executive at synergyc
Targetprocess has positively impacted my organization by integrating seamlessly with AWS billing data for improved cost transparency.
Senior Software Engineer at AT&T
Targetprocess has positively impacted our organization by reducing waste through maximizing integrations, allowing us to move away from manual rate management and tracking, enabling greater visibility to portfolio change management, and enabling us to become more data-driven.
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health
Some of the best features Targetprocess offers include business strategy alignment, resourcing information, mapping of work being executed with business outcomes, and visibility across the enterprise portfolio.
Fleet Manager at UPS
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure DevOps
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
137
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (2nd), Release Automation (1st)
Targetprocess
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
10th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Value Stream Management Software (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure DevOps is 34.7%, down from 38.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Targetprocess is 1.4%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Azure DevOps34.7%
Targetprocess1.4%
Other63.9%
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Bharadwaj Deepak Mohapatra - PeerSpot reviewer
DevOps Engineer at ENTERPRISE SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LIMITED
Have built reliable end-to-end pipelines and streamlined cloud provisioning through consistent collaboration practices
I am currently working with open-source tools such as Jenkins for my main CI/CD pipeline, and for enterprise clients, I am using Microsoft Azure DevOps CI/CD pipeline. For other clients, I have also implemented CI/CD YAML pipelines through GitLab CI/CD workflow and GitHub Actions. I am creating the end-to-end CI/CD pipeline from development to deployment and monitoring all of this. Azure Boards is easier than Jira for my understanding because there are very easy points to manage the Agile methodology which we work on. Because it is a GUI, sometimes the process may take a few minutes more than the CLI process since the backend is running the exact CLI, but we are commanding through the GUI. There is definitely a time lag, but it is more secure. Microsoft Azure DevOps pipelines work very seamlessly rather than other CI/CD pipelines, as of my understanding. The downside is that the process may take more time when deploying some clusters, Kubernetes, Azure AKS service, or some vast microservice architecture deployments. There may be a little bit of lag I feel, though I cannot tell very strictly that this is a disadvantage, but sometimes it takes a little more time than other cloud infrastructures. All the major things are done by GUI, which is somewhat a little slow. However, if considering automations, process, monitoring, and provisioning, then it is the best cloud service across all the other service providers. Our implementation is a hybrid cloud. Microsoft Azure DevOps is definitely easily scalable. I have worked on many Kubernetes infrastructures and microservice deployments, and I have seen that replication is very good because it is very easy. The replication process is very straightforward. I definitely advocate for using less code because it is very time-consuming. If using GCP or Amazon Web Service, there is more interaction related to work over the CLI process. In terms of Microsoft Azure DevOps, there are many things done by the GUI, which is the best part.
Joseph  Washington - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager at Target
Visual workflow has improved planning and reporting and now supports data driven decisions
The best features Targetprocess offers include web-based administrators of this application that allow me to do field level mapping in a significant way. It lets us use graphical and custom reports to pinpoint certain trends and I am able to forecast performance. Additionally, program board management, risk stroke dependency management, creating graphs and dashboards, and project governance planning are also great features. Targetprocess has positively impacted my organization because the license cost is low, hence saving a lot of time and cost. Efficiency has been improved. I am able to save approximately three to four hours per project. Also, it has increased levels of cross-team transparency.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
892,868 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
35%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Transportation Company
8%
Healthcare Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business43
Midsize Enterprise28
Large Enterprise68
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Large Enterprise10
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?
Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...
Which is better - TFS or Azure DevOps?
TFS and Azure DevOps are different in many ways. TFS was designed for admins, and only offers incremental improvements. In addition, TFS seems complicated to use and I don’t think it has a very fri...
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure DevOps?
Valuable features for project management and tracking in Azure DevOps include a portal displaying test results, check-in/check-out activity, and developer/tester productivity.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Targetprocess?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been very cost-effective. The licensing cost is low and very straightforward.
What needs improvement with Targetprocess?
Targetprocess can be improved by enhancing integration. Also, personalization capabilities at every user level should be improved. I would add that it should allow users to navigate easily.
What is your primary use case for Targetprocess?
Targetprocess is a powerful product that is frequently used by the whole organization. The powerful visualization of my workflow is a blessing because it allows me to have a perfect distraction-fre...
 

Also Known As

Azure DevOps, VSTS, Visual Studio Team Services, MS Azure DevOps
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Alaska Airlines, Iberia Airlines, Columbia, Skype
Vodafone, NHS, Infineon, Kone
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure DevOps vs. Targetprocess and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
892,868 professionals have used our research since 2012.