Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Polarion ALM Logo

Polarion ALM Reviews

Vendor: Siemens
3.9 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Polarion ALM?

The world’s first 100% browser-based ALM enterprise solution, which enables seamless collaboration across disparate teams, multi-directionally linked work items, full traceability, accelerated productivity and automated proof of compliance.

Get the Polarion ALM Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Polarion ALM, GitLab, Microsoft Azure DevOps and more!
Polarion ALM is the #3 ranked solution in top Application Lifecycle Management Suites and #6 ranked solution in top Enterprise Agile Planning Tools. PeerSpot users give Polarion ALM an average rating of 7.8 out of 10. Polarion ALM is most commonly compared to GitLab: Polarion ALM vs GitLab. Polarion ALM is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 65% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 28% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Polarion ALM
August 2025
Get the report
Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Featured Polarion ALM reviews

Read more reviews

Polarion ALM mindshare

Product category:
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM...
As of September 2025, the mindshare of Polarion ALM in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category stands at 7.5%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Polarion ALM7.5%
Jira17.7%
Microsoft Azure DevOps13.0%
Other61.8%
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

PeerResearch reports based on Polarion ALM reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Lifecycle Management (ALM) SuitesSep 18, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersSep 18, 2025Download
ComparisonPolarion ALM vs JiraSep 18, 2025Download
ComparisonPolarion ALM vs Microsoft Azure DevOpsSep 18, 2025Download
ComparisonPolarion ALM vs Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM)Sep 18, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
GitLab4.2N/A97%86 interviewsAdd to research
Microsoft Azure DevOps4.113.0%95%135 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Polarion ALM's most valuable features include robust traceability, comprehensive requirement management, and effective document control. Its user-friendly interface supports seamless workflow configuration and offers strong integration capabilities. Users appreciate the all-in-one nature, facilitating real-time collaboration and project tracking. Document management is particularly praised for its flexibility. The system supports agile practices, enhances task monitoring, and provides efficient planning resources. Its adaptability and control over product changes make it beneficial across various industries.
  • "Polarion ALM is excellent for tracking who is working on what and how many people are involved in a project."
  • "Polarion ALM delivers both document views and table views simultaneously and organizes configurations according to norms and standards."
  • "It's extremely flexible. Configuring items is straightforward and doesn't require involving the supplier each time. We find the requirement management, test management, documentation, and dashboards very effective."

Room for Improvement

Polarion ALM requires a more intuitive interface and enhanced integration with various external tools, including JIRA and Azure DevOps. Import processes need simplification. High pricing, limited user-friendly features, and outdated tutorials pose issues for smaller companies. Performance improvements are necessary for loading times and database migrations. Planning, task management, and reporting capabilities require enhancement. Continuous enhancements in automation and collaboration features are needed, along with improved technical support and cost-effective licensing options.
  • "The user interface of Polarion ALM needs improvement as it can experience changes that disrupt workflows, especially during major updates."
  • "The system’s technology is not the most current, leading to missing features that are common in web-based applications."
  • "I also recently suggested that CMS consider incorporating generative artificial intelligence into the system."

Pricing

Polarion ALM's pricing is perceived as expensive, particularly for smaller enterprises. It follows a yearly licensing model with added maintenance and support costs. While some find it comparable to other solutions like Integrity, others say it is one of the most costly options. Optional plugins and third-party solutions can further increase expenses. Multi-year subscriptions may offer better rates, and costs generally vary depending on user needs and existing agreements.
  • "It is an expensive product."
  • "You have to pay around 50-60 euros per user."
  • "Software for medical devices is always expensive."

Popular Use Cases

Polarion ALM is used primarily for requirements engineering and application lifecycle management across various industries. Teams utilize it for task planning, documentation, and testing. It supports software and medical device development, assisting in compliance and regulatory needs. It integrates with SVN and GitLab for version control. Organizations use it in development, project management, and testing processes, ensuring effective requirement tracking and validation. Its versatility and integration capabilities make it popular for complex multi-project environments.

Service and Support

Customer service and support for Polarion ALM receives mixed assessments. Some find it good and quick to respond, while others experience varying levels of expertise. Hidden resources can be accessed through direct inquiries. Pre-acquisition support was noted as better. Several companies use their own support teams alongside Siemens for advanced needs. Some rate the support highly, yet raising tickets can be slow for minor issues. Frequent feedback highlights a need for improved direct problem resolution.

Deployment

Polarion ALM's initial setup is generally straightforward for many, taking a few hours. However, it can become complex with customization and load balancing. Some found it user-friendly, though others noted the need for good training. It involves integration time, and certain updates may lead to issues. Deployment varies by scenario and customer requirements, sometimes needing significant collaboration and ongoing configuration adjustments for smooth operations.

Scalability

Polarion ALM exhibits a mix of perceptions on scalability. Some users find it easily expandable with the right resources, including server capacity and team support. Others face architectural limitations, especially when managing complex configurations or maintaining large volumes over time. Challenges include non-user-friendly administration and the need for an expanded management team to effectively scale across projects. Despite this, many appreciate its configurability and adaptability to varied requirements.

Stability

Polarion ALM is generally stable with some challenges. Users note slow loading times, especially with over 1000 work items in one LiveDoc, requiring workarounds. Regular downtimes are rare, yet heavy resource consumption can affect performance. Users find it reliable, though deployment and infrastructure impact stability. Some prefer Git over SVN for modern technology requirements. Reporting and dashboard creation take longer, and quick vendor support often resolves minor issues. Stability ratings vary between seven and nine out of ten.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Polarion ALM Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business176
Midsize Enterprise104
Large Enterprise513
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
28%
Computer Software Company
11%
Healthcare Company
7%
Educational Organization
4%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Retailer
3%
Transportation Company
3%
Engineering Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
University
2%
Construction Company
2%
Media Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
2%
Government
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Insurance Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%

Compare Polarion ALM with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Polarion ALM

Polarion ALM customers

Engineering Ingegneria Informatica, IBS AG, Zumtobel Group

Related questions

  • 20
When evaluating Application Lifecycle Management suites, what aspects do you think are the most important to look for?
  • 13
Looking for suggestions - we need a test management and defect tracking tool which can be integrated with an automation tool.
  • 36
Looking for a Comparison of JIRA, TFS & HP ALM as a Test Management Tool
  • 4
Do you have any feedback on the HPE ALM Octane release that came out in June 2016?
  • 11
How does Digite's Swift ALM tool compare with HPE ALM or JIRA?
  • 66
Would you use one or both ALM and JIRA to manage the SDLC and production support work?
  • 10
What ALM software do you recommend for building web apps?
  • 39
What is better for ALM: Scrum or Kanban?
  • 5
What features should one consider when choosing an ALM suite?
  • 32
What is your recommended Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) product for a large enterprise?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
GitLab vs Polarion ALM Logo
GitLab vs Polarion ALM
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Polarion ALM Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Polarion ALM
Jira vs Polarion ALM Logo
Jira vs Polarion ALM
OpenText Application Quality Management vs Polarion ALM Logo
OpenText Application Quality Management vs Polarion ALM
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Polarion ALM Logo
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Polarion ALM
Codebeamer vs Polarion ALM Logo
Codebeamer vs Polarion ALM
Jama Connect vs Polarion ALM Logo
Jama Connect vs Polarion ALM
TFS vs Polarion ALM Logo
TFS vs Polarion ALM
Rally Software vs Polarion ALM Logo
Rally Software vs Polarion ALM
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Polarion ALM Logo
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Polarion ALM
Jira Align vs Polarion ALM Logo
Jira Align vs Polarion ALM
PTC Integrity vs Polarion ALM Logo
PTC Integrity vs Polarion ALM
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs Polarion ALM Logo
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs Polarion ALM
Helix ALM vs Polarion ALM Logo
Helix ALM vs Polarion ALM
IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs Polarion ALM Logo
IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs Polarion ALM
See all alternatives
 
Polarion ALM Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Associate I Android Product Validation Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees3.5As a manual tester, I find Polarion ALM essential for build validation and bug management. Its user-friendly interface aids in tracking project involvement. However, it needs improvements in interface stability and speed, particularly during major updates and bulk data handling.
Digital Tranformation Expert for Lifecycle Management4.0I find Polarion ALM valuable for organizing configurations in medical and cyber-physical development, though its performance and scalability need improvement. It's less modern than web-based applications and lacks in collaboration features, with a complex setup and high cost.
Information and Communication technology at CNH Industrial4.5We use Polarion ALM for software development, focusing on requirements and test management. Its flexibility and effectiveness in tracking are valuable, but I recommend adding generative AI for improved requirement checking and model development. We use Azure DevOps for integration.
Head of Software Development at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees4.5I’ve used Polarion ALM for 16 years, primarily for requirements management, appreciating its flexibility, traceability, and collaboration features, though I find its Agile backlog and reporting capabilities could be improved compared to tools like Jira.
Program Manager at Mettler-Toledo International Inc.4.0I use Polarion ALM to manage requirements in my industry. It is valuable for development-related tasks and planning, especially with Agile and DevOps. However, integration with other tools, particularly Azure DevOps, needs improvement for better functionality.
Field Application Engineer at FTD INFOCOM4.0I've primarily used Polarion ALM for importing requirements, customization, and integration. Its browser experience and traceability are highly valuable. However, integration is challenging and often requires paid connectors and significant effort with third-party software.
Global IT Director of Digital Platforms. Digital and Connected Commerce at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees3.5I use Polarion ALM for project management and documentation control. While its ALM functions are valuable, editing capabilities need improvement, especially trace matrices. Collaboration issues arise when multiple users edit the same document. The solution offers a high ROI and is deployed on AWS.
Co Founder at CieDIWEB3.5I use Polarion ALM in my company for the software testing lifecycle, primarily for test management and dashboard creation. Its greatest strength is its robust control compared to Jira, though the dashboard's complexity needs improvement. Our CTO chose Polarion over Jira.