We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure DevOps and PractiTest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."The automated bill feature is most valuable. As with most software developers, I can build code on my machine, but if one of my coworkers can't build the same code on theirs, there are always issues in trying to track it down. The automated bill process makes it a lot easier to track down where the issues are and find out what bugs aren't being included for whatever reason."
"In Microsoft Azure DevOps, you have a one shop to get everything."
"It is easy to use. The shared repository is useful. Everything is in one environment."
"This platform provides a large span of tools and technologies."
"It's got something that you won't find in other products."
"Our technical sales staff and business development people need to know how far the developers are on any product that we're developing. DevOps makes it easier for you to see how far along they are with the work because they have a repository where they store everything. There is a portal where you can see what has been done, what has been tested, what is working, and what isn't. I have a huge dashboard with an overview of what the development team is doing from an executive point of view."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is task management."
"It is good for the purpose it is designed for. It is good for maintaining a repository of application code, creating pipelines for deploying the code, building the code, and deploying the code. It can be easily used by developers. There are no issues."
"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."
"Its price can also be reduced. It would be great if they are a little bit more competitive in terms of pricing because many open-source products are currently available in the market."
"The interface is very bad."
"It should be easier to manage Licenses especially because it's in the cloud."
"They have brought a lot of new collaboration features in the latest version. We haven't used those features, but they should continue to expand it more on the collaboration front so that two developers can look at the code and work at the same time. It will be helpful for working from home."
"The solution is generally stable but not entirely issue-free."
"The test management section needs to be improved."
"If they could build up requirement traceability metrics, then it would be great."
"Azure DevOps could be improved with more security plugins, especially for SaaS scanning and vulnerability scans."
"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Azure DevOps is ranked 1st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 124 reviews while PractiTest is ranked 20th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Microsoft Azure DevOps is rated 8.2, while PractiTest is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure DevOps writes "Good support, helpful management capabilities, and great Kanban boards". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Offers one click graphical dashboard reports and advanced customization". Microsoft Azure DevOps is most compared with GitLab, Jira, TFS, Rally Software and ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, whereas PractiTest is most compared with TestRail, Zephyr Enterprise and Jira.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
