We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure DevOps and PractiTest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Micro Focus and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."The one thing that really stands out to me is how you can filter and how you can do your reporting and filter the tasks and everything by user."
"Microsoft has good integration with its other products, such as Office, Teams, et cetera."
"Provides agile management of projects."
"I like the tracking and that we can monitor our velocity."
"Some of the most valuable features are the ease of use and the ability to monitor a lot of things. It has a lot of applications and facilities that meet all the developers' requirements. For example, we can use application insights to get an idea of our application's performance. Since it's cloud-based, it's really good for collaboration and working as a team."
"The reports have been most valuable. We have created some dashboards allowing us to be able to check our teams, their progress, and mission plans."
"The nice thing about Visual Studio Code is that it's a modular design. So if you're working on a strange language that has a different syntax, you can just get a plugin that'll format your code for you based on the language it's in."
"Most of the features are very valuable for us, especially the source code control and task management."
"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."
"The optimization feature in Microsoft Azure DevOps needs improvement. Control over multiple projects could also be improved."
"They should expand it from just a PC, software, or server development platform to other kinds of software or engineering systems so that it is not necessarily built around a normal PC with a server. I would like to see the ability to write my own scripts in my own compiled program or online. Right now, there are things that you can do in the user interface, but you can't do them programmatically and vice versa. I want to see them both. If I can do it in a script, I should be able to do it from the user interface, and if I can do it in the user interface, I should be able to do it in a script."
"The tool has a logical link between epic feature, user story, and task, but when you try to generate a report to show the delivery progress against a feature, it is not easy. To see the percentage completion for a feature or progress of any delivery, it is not easy to draw a report."
"Azure DevOps is set up more for development and less for testing. If it is set up correctly, everyone can use it better, but it was set up from a development point of view, which means it is lacking in what I need from a testing perspective. Just like any other tool, it depends on how it is configured. I am not happy with the way it is set up. It is configured more from a development side, and it doesn't necessarily cater to all the other areas that probably need to use it, such as testing data, etc."
"It should have security features for scanning the code and checking it for vulnerability and security. Currently, I am using other tools for this. It should also have integration with other tools to improve security."
"As for room for improvement, more features need to be added to the classic pipeline. The build and release pipelines are present, but there has not been much improvement there."
"The UI could be improved."
"I think that the integration is to some extent, immature."
"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."
Microsoft Azure DevOps is ranked 2nd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 82 reviews while PractiTest is ranked 17th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 1 review. Microsoft Azure DevOps is rated 8.0, while PractiTest is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure DevOps writes "Robust functionality, good integration, continually enhanced, and easy to scale". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat". Microsoft Azure DevOps is most compared with Jira, GitLab, TFS, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, whereas PractiTest is most compared with TestRail by Gurock, Zephyr Enterprise, Jira, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center and Tricentis qTest.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
