Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Functional Testing pros and cons

Vendor: OpenText

4.0 out of 5

98 reviews
87% willing to recommend

Pros & Cons summary

OpenText Functional Testing integrates seamlessly across platforms, supporting applications like Oracle and SAP. Its GUI testing, automation capabilities, and custom framework support enhance productivity, though it demands significant system resources, leading to slow performance. Licensing costs are high, and technical support is often delayed. Despite these challenges, it simplifies coding with diverse technology support, although it presents a learning curve for developers and stability issues during regression testing.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

OpenText Functional Testing has exceptional compatibility with a wide range of products, tools, and technologies, making it versatile for various projects and environments.

Record and playback, along with descriptive programming, are highly valued features, offering ease of use and efficiency in automation.

The integration capabilities with both API and GUI components enhance the software's utility and flexibility.

The ability to automate different applications streamlines day-to-day activities and improves operational efficiency.

OpenText Functional Testing offers high stability and reliability, making it suitable for large enterprises and long-term use.

CONS

OpenText Functional Testing may experience slow performance and high memory usage, especially on virtual servers without sufficient RAM.

There are compatibility issues with certain UI controls, such as Telerik, and limitations in supported programming languages, currently restricted to VBScript.

Integration with CI/CD pipelines and other tools like Selenium needs improvement, and the AI features are limited to web applications, requiring advancements.

The licensing and cost structure of OpenText Functional Testing is considered expensive, leading to resistance from users and organizations.

Support and customer service are reported as inadequate, with delays in issue resolution and response times from technical support.

OpenText Functional Testing Pros review quotes

Sr. QA Automation Engineer at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees

Sep 29, 2022

With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files.

Read full review

Principal Consultant | Contractor Manager at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Aug 25, 2017

The most valuable features for us are the GUI, the easy identification of objects, and folder structure creation.

Read full review

Project Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

May 22, 2016

The ease of record and playback as well as descriptive programming are the most valuable features of UFT (QTP).

Read full review

OpenText Functional Testing

Free Report: OpenText Functional Testing Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about OpenText Functional Testing. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2025.

879,455 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Software Test Leader with 1,001-5,000 employees

Dec 8, 2016

The most valuable feature for me is that it works on multiple platforms and technologies.

Read full review

Test consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 24, 2017

It's not only web-based but also for backend applications; you can also do the integration of the applications.

Read full review

Qa engineer

Sep 19, 2017

Being able to automate different applications makes day-to-day activities a lot easier.

Read full review

Director of quality assurance and testing at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Sep 19, 2017

I like the fact that we can use LeanFT with our UFT licenses as well.

Read full review

Lead QA Engineer at Guaranteed Rate

Oct 10, 2017

Hidden among the kitchen sink of features is a new Data Generation tool called the Test Combinations Generator.

Read full review

Consultant

Dec 15, 2017

Record and Replay to ease onboarding of new users.

Read full review

AST at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Jan 26, 2018

We have used it for the web and Windows-based applications. It is very productive in terms of execution.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 54)

OpenText Functional Testing Cons review quotes

Sr. QA Automation Engineer at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees

Sep 29, 2022

Sometimes it appears that UFT takes a while to open and sometimes will run slower than expected. Also, UFT uses a lot of memory. On this note, if you are running UFT on a virtual server I would add more RAM memory than the minimum requirements especially when using multiple add-ins. HP is pretty good about coming out with new patches to fix known issues and it pays for the user to check for new patches and updates on a regular basis.

Read full review

Principal Consultant | Contractor Manager at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Aug 25, 2017

It doesn't support Telerik UI controls and we are currently looking for a patch for this.

Read full review

Project Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

May 22, 2016

The product should evolve to be flexible so one can use any programming language such as Java and C#, and not just VB script.

Read full review

OpenText Functional Testing

Free Report: OpenText Functional Testing Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about OpenText Functional Testing. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2025.

879,455 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Software Test Leader with 1,001-5,000 employees

Dec 8, 2016

One thing that confused me, and now just mildly irritates me, is that we migrated from QuickTest Pro to HP UFT, Unified Functional Test. After we did the migration, it turned out that we didn't really have Unified Functional Test at all.

Read full review

Test consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 24, 2017

You have to deal with issues such as the firewall and how can the tool talk with the application, i.e., if the application is on a company network and so on. That, of course, is important to figure out.

Read full review

Qa engineer

Sep 19, 2017

Perhaps more coverage as far as different languages go. I'm talking more about object identification.

Read full review

Director of quality assurance and testing at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Sep 19, 2017

I'd like to see UFT integrated more with some of the open source tools like Selenium, where web is involved.

Read full review

Lead QA Engineer at Guaranteed Rate

Oct 10, 2017

Jumping to functions is supported from any Action/BPT Component code, but not from inside a function library where the target function exists in another library file. Workaround: Select search entire project for the function.

Read full review

Consultant

Dec 15, 2017

Scripting has become more complex from a maintenance standpoint to support additional browsers.

Read full review

AST at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Jan 26, 2018

Needs to improve the integration with the CI/CD pipeline (VSTS and report generation).

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 54)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Functional Testing Tools

Mobile App Testing Tools

Regression Testing Tools

API Testing Tools

Test Automation Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing

Katalon Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Functional Testing

BrowserStack vs OpenText Functional Testing

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Functional Testing

Postman Enterprise vs OpenText Functional Testing

Eggplant Test vs OpenText Functional Testing

BlazeMeter vs OpenText Functional Testing

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing

Worksoft Certify vs OpenText Functional Testing

Testim vs OpenText Functional Testing

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText Functional Testing

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Functional Testing Tools

Mobile App Testing Tools

Regression Testing Tools

API Testing Tools

Test Automation Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing

Katalon Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Functional Testing

BrowserStack vs OpenText Functional Testing

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Functional Testing

Postman Enterprise vs OpenText Functional Testing

Eggplant Test vs OpenText Functional Testing

BlazeMeter vs OpenText Functional Testing

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing

Worksoft Certify vs OpenText Functional Testing

Testim vs OpenText Functional Testing

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText Functional Testing

See all alternatives

Related questions

31

Can JIRA provide integration to SAP automation?

19

SAP GUI Testing Tool

15

Has any user tried using UFT 12.02 with Windows 10?

11

UFT 14 vs UFT 12.54

49

Can javascript be used as a scripting language for tests in QTP or is it strictly VB?

6

Can QTP calculate the number of pixels on a web page?

9

Which product supports Cross Browser Testing: UFT Developer or UFT One?

125

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

18

Is Oracle Application Testing Suite or Micro Focus UFT One better for automating Oracle Fusion Applications?

19

Which product do you prefer: Micro Focus UFT One or SmartBear TestComplete?