CEO at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Nov 4, 2019
The Real User Monitor, with its transaction and synthetic transaction monitoring, is the typical classic in APM cases when the customer would like to do transaction monitoring. Micro Focus scores better where the underlying infrastructure management is also covered by Micro Focus tools.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Dynatrace, AppDynamics and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
Presales Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Nov 2, 2021
The most useful feature of this solution is tracking. When the application's traffic has been monitored it is taken from that particular application and analyzed. It is then given a live session of that particular user. For example, if you are using your bank application to do some kind of transaction, everything that you do can be tracked by that application.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Dynatrace, AppDynamics and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
Sr. Solution Architect, Project Manager at The National Commercial Bank
Oct 20, 2022
Real User Monitor needs to cover more protocols to provide more in-depth information. It could also be better at monitoring voice-related traffic. There is currently no visibility in that channel.
Presales Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Nov 2, 2021
Everybody is moving away from traffic and installing agents on the application to do the job, but Micro Focus is using traditional ways to collect the traffic. They should change their architecture completely.
