"We have seen Workfusion improve on accuracy and compliance... With the Workfusion model, we reduce human error and the need for further QC. We switch more to a QA process where we're testing whether the model is effective."
"We recommend different solutions based on our customers' needs, and WorkFusion is what we offer for those who need a premium solution."
"It really does help by either freeing up people's time to focus on more value-added tasks or reducing headcount. We generally have other things that we can get people to do, helping make the employees' work more meaningful since they are not having to do the mundane stuff."
"The most valuable features are the Excel activities. It has a number of Excel activities that are quite reliable."
"The Robotic Desktop Automation Express component allows us to do rapid development outside the normal, time-consuming processes."
"It's a pretty robust product."
"The solution is stable, we have not had any glitches or problems."
"Their robots have increased the rate of efficiency by two to five times in our organization. There is still a human element to code out the package running the robots. You can't just click something and have it run. However, once that has been done, you can parallelize it 10 or 100 times in a fairly straightforward manner."
"We don't have to do any coding. We just plug and play and it works."
"VisualCron is a very powerful program to automate different steps in your business processes. We use it to automate replacing files and inform departments about the replacement."
"I find WinAutomation's linear approach to the code and function calling valuable."
"The best feature is that it doesn't require any other connectivity."
"The technical support is good."
"The most valuable feature is that you can run multiple automations at the same time, in parallel."
"This product has an easy-to-use interface with nice detail in the features."
"One thing we didn't like was their OCR solution. We felt it's somewhat inefficient."
"I would like it if they provided a more detailed roadmap in terms of where they are going with the product. As we are trying to make decisions about the things that we are going to do to try to augment our capabilities, we could know whether they are thinking about the same things or not."
"The most common issue we have is with the OCR, but that also depends on the quality of the documents your scanning. Still, I would say the OCR is comparable to other solutions. I wouldn't say it's better or worse than other OCR engines."
"There could be better version control through their web platform. That is something that could be improved on. Integration from the IDE, e.g., from WorkFusion Studio directly into Control Tower, would be nice to have too."
"We have executed our robots thousands of times in our enterprise environment. However, in an enterprise environment, WorkFusion has performance problems. It is slow in production."
"So far, we have developed only one automation using machine learning. The results were less than optimal. Part of this could be because of the use case that was selected. Overall, our experience was suboptimal. WorkFusion was an outstanding partner in terms of providing their experts for free to help us on that particular use case, but we still have a lot of things to figure out in terms of how to use its machine learning capability."
"The product could do more to expand its 'codeless' coding options by adding drag-and-drop assistance in building bots for non-technical users."
"The solution is not user-friendly, this is something they should improve."
"There are some conditions in the mail trigger, but you can only use them as an "AND" condition, not as an "OR" condition. This is an improvement that could be useful. For example, some people put "invoice" in the subject and others put "invoice" in the body. If I want to make a trigger for everybody whose sending invoices, I have to make two jobs for this now."
"The only problem I face when I use the tool is that it doesn't contain much documentation or it doesn't have many video tutorials on its features."
"It should work better for Angular websites, as it has a lot of problems."
"The stability of the product is not very good and can even fail with simple projects."
"There is a limitation in setting up loops, where it does not support multiple conditions."
"The OCR functionality needs to be improved."
"WinAutomation is scalable to a certain extent. I would rate it seven for the scalability, which could be better. Softomotive is better scalable than WinAutomation in this regard."
VisualCron is ranked 19th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 2 reviews while WinAutomation by Softomotive is ranked 16th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 5 reviews. VisualCron is rated 8.0, while WinAutomation by Softomotive is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of VisualCron writes "Has many features and plugins but it's not easy to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WinAutomation by Softomotive writes "You can build your RPA solutions with this easy-to-use product but the stability is questionable". VisualCron is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, Control-M, UiPath, ActiveBatch Workload Automation and OpCon, whereas WinAutomation by Softomotive is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath, Automation Anywhere (AA), ProcessRobot by Softomotive and Blue Prism. See our VisualCron vs. WinAutomation by Softomotive report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
