Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Trellix Logo
1,007 views|502 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
XM Cyber Logo
2,111 views|1,079 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Verodin and XM Cyber based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS).
To learn more, read our detailed Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is constantly updating. Their data and security validation are cutting-edge."

More Verodin Pros →

"The platform's most valuable feature is attack simulation.""What I personally like very much, from my experience, is that it is very reliable."

More XM Cyber Pros →

Cons
"The integration engine needs to improve."

More Verodin Cons →

"XM Cyber could identify all areas of vulnerability. They could expand the identification span for different areas.""We'd like to see a cheaper price."

More XM Cyber Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "We have to pay standard licensing fees."
  • More XM Cyber Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The platform's most valuable feature is attack simulation.
    Top Answer:We have to pay standard licensing fees. There are no additional costs. It is an expensive product. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.
    Top Answer:XM Cyber could identify all areas of vulnerability. They could expand the identification span for different areas.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,007
    Comparisons
    502
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    2,111
    Comparisons
    1,079
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    294
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    AttackIQ logo
    Compared 25% of the time.
    Picus Security logo
    Compared 22% of the time.
    Cymulate logo
    Compared 19% of the time.
    Pentera logo
    Compared 18% of the time.
    SafeBreach logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Pentera logo
    Compared 30% of the time.
    Cymulate logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    SafeBreach logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Picus Security logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Tenable Security Center logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    Equipped with FireEye frontline intelligence, the Verodin platform will measure and test security environments against both known and newly discovered threats, empowering organizations to identify risks in their security controls before a breach occurs, and rapidly adapt their defenses to the evolving threat landscape.

    XM Cyber is a leading hybrid cloud security company that’s changing the way innovative organizations approach cyber risk. Our attack path management platform continuously uncovers hidden attack paths to your critical assets across cloud and on-prem environments, so you can cut them off at key junctures and eradicate risk with a fraction of the effort. This overcomes the big disconnect that security teams experience when they’re presented with endless alerts, yet can’t see which exposures impact risk the most, how they come together to be exploited by an attacker, or how to efficiently eliminate them. This approach is a complete game-changer, which is why some of the world’s largest, most complex organizations choose XM Cyber to help eradicate risk. Founded by top executives from the Israeli cyber intelligence community, XM Cyber has offices in North America, Europe, and Israel.

    Sample Customers
    AAFCU, Amuse, Axway, Bank Gutmann, Bank of Thailand, BCC Corporation, Blackboat, CapWealth Advisors, CBC, CERN, Lagardère, Land Bank of the Philippines, laya healthcare, Lindsay Automotive Group
    Hamburg Port Authority, Plymouth Rock Corporation
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise72%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Buyer's Guide
    Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Verodin is ranked 10th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) while XM Cyber is ranked 5th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 2 reviews. Verodin is rated 7.0, while XM Cyber is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Verodin writes "Stable with good updates but needs a better integration engine". On the other hand, the top reviewer of XM Cyber writes "Reliable with no false-positives and helpful support". Verodin is most compared with AttackIQ, Picus Security, Cymulate, Pentera and SafeBreach, whereas XM Cyber is most compared with Pentera, Cymulate, SafeBreach, Picus Security and Tenable Security Center.

    See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.

    We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.