We performed a comparison between Verodin and XM Cyber based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)."The solution is constantly updating. Their data and security validation are cutting-edge."
"The platform's most valuable feature is attack simulation."
"What I personally like very much, from my experience, is that it is very reliable."
"The integration engine needs to improve."
"XM Cyber could identify all areas of vulnerability. They could expand the identification span for different areas."
"We'd like to see a cheaper price."
Earn 20 points
Verodin is ranked 10th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) while XM Cyber is ranked 5th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 2 reviews. Verodin is rated 7.0, while XM Cyber is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Verodin writes "Stable with good updates but needs a better integration engine". On the other hand, the top reviewer of XM Cyber writes "Reliable with no false-positives and helpful support". Verodin is most compared with AttackIQ, Picus Security, Cymulate, Pentera and SafeBreach, whereas XM Cyber is most compared with Pentera, Cymulate, SafeBreach, Picus Security and Tenable Security Center.
See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.
We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.