We performed a comparison between Cymulate and XM Cyber based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The reporting capabilities are very good."
"The most valuable feature for us is the zero-day."
"The platform's most valuable feature is attack simulation."
"What I personally like very much, from my experience, is that it is very reliable."
"The reporting process requires significant improvement as it often takes longer than expected and the quality is lacking."
"The product must provide consultancy for initial setup."
"XM Cyber could identify all areas of vulnerability. They could expand the identification span for different areas."
"We'd like to see a cheaper price."
Cymulate is ranked 2nd in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 2 reviews while XM Cyber is ranked 5th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 2 reviews. Cymulate is rated 9.0, while XM Cyber is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cymulate writes "An affordable solution that improves an organization’s security posture and provides excellent reporting capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of XM Cyber writes "Reliable with no false-positives and helpful support". Cymulate is most compared with Pentera, Picus Security, SafeBreach, AttackIQ and Mandiant Advantage, whereas XM Cyber is most compared with Pentera, SafeBreach, Picus Security, Tenable Security Center and Qualys VMDR. See our Cymulate vs. XM Cyber report.
See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.
We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
