Cymulate vs Verodin comparison

Cymulate and Trellix are both solutions in the Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) category. Cymulate is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while Trellix is ranked #9. Cymulate holds a 18.3% mindshare in BAS, compared to Trellix’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cymulate users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Cymulate

Read 6 Cymulate reviews

3,897 Views
2,416 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Verodin

Read 1 Verodin review

353 Views
339 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cymulate

Verodin

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cymulate and Verodin based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cymulate, Horizon3.ai, Pentera and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS).

To learn more, read our detailed Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cymulate

Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (10th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (11th), Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (2nd)

Verodin

Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)

9th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) category, the mindshare of Cymulate is 18.3%, down from 22.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Verodin is 1.9%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cymulate	18.3%
Verodin	1.9%
Other	79.8%

Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)

Featured Reviews

SaarBar

Security Architec at Shikun & Binui

Support and integration enhance security posture over three years

I don't know if there's something that could be improved. They surprise me. As I mentioned, I returned a month ago. I haven't fully investigated the complete system yet. I must say that we have been with them for around three years. This is amazing because throughout these three years, they have supported us every week. We meet weekly to review results and fix issues together. Apart from occasional days off, this weekly support has been consistent for three years. It's remarkable because many products are sold and then the product teams forget about you, but this isn't the case with Cymulate.

Read full review

reviewer945171

Cyber Security Consultant at a tech consulting company with self employed

Stable with good updates but needs a better integration engine

The integration engine needs to improve. We try to integrate it with other tools, especially with Splunk or with the MyDLP engine, and even with Microsoft Exchange. As much as they tried to make it seem like it was easy, it wasn't easy. There was a lot of stuff that we had to do that we ended up having to do via an API or something special for a new case. That's a big issue for me. Integration is daunting. It leaves a lot of room for failure and frustration. There are just little nuances that make everything difficult. You're supposed to be able to flip this toggle thing here, and you're supposed to be able to get the feedthrough from Splunk. Then, from there everything should be perfectly fine. However, when you find out it is not perfectly fine and you find out that it's because this thing isn't necessarily correct, you have to do an update on it or they have to update their file to make it work correctly. It's very small, minute things that aren't quite right. It's not something that you can really pinpoint. There's a lot of nuanced issues. It the nuanced technical issues that you would notice once you cross its path. It's not one of those "Hey, this is something I would know off the top of my head." They are very small nuance issues that make you say "Oh, well I guess we've got to go and change this thing now." You get this with certain tools - mostly with Mandiant tools more than anything else in general. It's one of those Mandiant quirks that still carries on and persists to this day - even with this tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The reporting capabilities are very good."

"The most valuable feature for us is the zero-day."

"Cymulate has positively impacted our organization by helping us to take care of the efficacy and reviewing the policies and configuration."

"Cymulate is easy to set up, install, and configure."

"The security validation feature helps my organization in assessing our security posture."

"With Cymulate, the best features are the capacity to test the EDR or malware, anti-malware solution."

"The solution is constantly updating. Their data and security validation are cutting-edge."

Cons

"The reporting process requires significant improvement as it often takes longer than expected and the quality is lacking."

"The cost can be quite high, and it impacts scalability as more simulations require additional expenses."

"I will be honest, we have it, but in the last year, I didn't maintain the system until a month ago."

"The way Cymulate works for EDR could be improved, as it drops payload and requires action from the EDR console for remediation, which can block the whole process of Cymulate execution."

"We have had some trouble with the agents."

"The product must provide consultancy for initial setup."

"The integration engine needs to improve."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is affordable."

"Cymulate's services are expensive."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

28%

Comms Service Provider

15%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	3

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cymulate?

The most valuable feature for us is the zero-day.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cymulate?

I don't know if it's expensive. It depends on the modules that you want, or the time, because they give you a tenant. A tenant for you.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cymulate?

I don't know if that helped with quick decision making for my security team because I am the security team and you must have a dedicated team to work with this tool. I don't use the analytics modul...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Pentera vs Cymulate

Compared 26% of the time

Picus Security vs Cymulate

Compared 16% of the time

XM Cyber vs Cymulate

Compared 11% of the time

SafeBreach vs Cymulate

Compared 7% of the time

AttackIQ vs Cymulate

Compared 6% of the time

More Cymulate Competitors

Picus Security vs Verodin

Compared 26% of the time

Pentera vs Verodin

Compared 20% of the time

SafeBreach vs Verodin

Compared 19% of the time

AttackIQ vs Verodin

Compared 16% of the time

More Verodin Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cymulate

December 2025

Download Cymulate product report

Buyer's Guide

Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)

November 2025

Download Verodin product report

Overview

For companies that want to manage their security posture against the evolving threat landscape: Cymulate SaaS-based Extended Security Posture Management (XSPM) deploys within an hour, enabling security professionals to continuously challenge, validate and optimize their cyber-security posture end-to-end across the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The platform provides out-of-the-box, expert and threat intelligence-led risk assessments that are simple to deploy and use for all maturity levels, and constantly updated. It also provides an open framework to create and automate red and purple teaming by generating penetration scenarious and advanced attack campaigns tailored to their unique environments and security politices. Cymulate allowes professionals to manage, know and control their dynamic environment.

Cymulate

Equipped with FireEye frontline intelligence, the Verodin platform will measure and test security environments against both known and newly discovered threats, empowering organizations to identify risks in their security controls before a breach occurs, and rapidly adapt their defenses to the evolving threat landscape.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Euronext, YMCA, Telit, Nemours

AAFCU, Amuse, Axway, Bank Gutmann, Bank of Thailand, BCC Corporation, Blackboat, CapWealth Advisors, CBC, CERN, Lagardère, Land Bank of the Philippines, laya healthcare, Lindsay Automotive Group

Buyer's Guide

Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)

November 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Cymulate, Horizon3.ai, Pentera and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.

We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.