AttackIQ vs Verodin comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
AttackIQ Logo
2,039 views|1,319 comparisons
Trellix Logo
1,066 views|524 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AttackIQ and Verodin based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS).
To learn more, read our detailed Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Overall, I've had a good experience with the product. It's worked well for me."

More AttackIQ Pros →

"The solution is constantly updating. Their data and security validation are cutting-edge."

More Verodin Pros →

Cons
"The initial setup was quite difficult and took a long time."

More AttackIQ Cons →

"The integration engine needs to improve."

More Verodin Cons →

Ranking
Views
2,039
Comparisons
1,319
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
1,066
Comparisons
524
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Pentera logo
Compared 23% of the time.
Picus Security logo
Compared 18% of the time.
Cymulate logo
Compared 17% of the time.
SafeBreach logo
Compared 15% of the time.
Picus Security logo
Compared 26% of the time.
Cymulate logo
Compared 19% of the time.
Pentera logo
Compared 16% of the time.
SafeBreach logo
Compared 15% of the time.
Learn More
Overview

The AttackIQ platform enables continuous validation that your security controls, processes and people are working as intended and delivering ROI. It seamlessly integrates into any existing network, delivering immediate visibility into your security program so you can uncover gaps in coverage, identify misconfigurations, and quickly prioritize remediation efforts.

Equipped with FireEye frontline intelligence, the Verodin platform will measure and test security environments against both known and newly discovered threats, empowering organizations to identify risks in their security controls before a breach occurs, and rapidly adapt their defenses to the evolving threat landscape.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
AAFCU, Amuse, Axway, Bank Gutmann, Bank of Thailand, BCC Corporation, Blackboat, CapWealth Advisors, CBC, CERN, Lagardère, Land Bank of the Philippines, laya healthcare, Lindsay Automotive Group
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm15%
Computer Software Company12%
Comms Service Provider8%
Manufacturing Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm26%
Computer Software Company11%
Manufacturing Company9%
Government7%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise62%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise73%
Buyer's Guide
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AttackIQ is ranked 7th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) while Verodin is ranked 10th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). AttackIQ is rated 7.0, while Verodin is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of AttackIQ writes "Overall, a good user experience and works well but is hard to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Verodin writes "Stable with good updates but needs a better integration engine". AttackIQ is most compared with Pentera, Picus Security, Cymulate, SafeBreach and Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, whereas Verodin is most compared with Picus Security, Cymulate, Pentera and SafeBreach.

See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.

We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.