Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Pentera Logo
5,003 views|3,285 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Trellix Logo
1,007 views|502 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Pentera and Verodin based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS).
To learn more, read our detailed Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great.""Maybe there are some remediation steps on the website, we can mask sensitive information on the website better.""The product is easy to use.""The most valuable feature of Pentera is that you can do continuous vulnerability assessment, which is automated.""What I like the most about Pentera is its solution-oriented approach."

More Pentera Pros →

"The solution is constantly updating. Their data and security validation are cutting-edge."

More Verodin Pros →

Cons
"The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great.""Maybe scalability. I know that the Pentera right now is high level in order to scan big deals over 500 IPs and not less, and not less. That can be more granular. This will be useful.""There is room for improvement in virtualization compatibility.""Pentera's general dashboards could be improved and made more specific in terms of vulnerabilities that I'm discovering.""The price could be improved."

More Pentera Cons →

"The integration engine needs to improve."

More Verodin Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We have to pay a yearly licensing cost for Pentera."
  • "It's not that expensive, but it could be more cost-effective."
  • More Pentera Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution is used for test simulation. It simulates tests on all our servers to know the vulnerabilities in them.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    5,003
    Comparisons
    3,285
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    321
    Rating
    8.3
    Views
    1,007
    Comparisons
    502
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Cymulate logo
    Compared 19% of the time.
    Tenable Nessus logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Picus Security logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Horizon3.ai logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Qualys VMDR logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    AttackIQ logo
    Compared 25% of the time.
    Picus Security logo
    Compared 22% of the time.
    Cymulate logo
    Compared 19% of the time.
    SafeBreach logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    Pentera is the category leader for Automated Security Validation, allowing every organization to evaluate its security readiness, to know its real security risk at any given moment. Test all cybersecurity layers across the attack surface – inside and out – by safely emulating attacks & prioritize patching with a risk-based remediation roadmap.

    Thousands of security professionals and service providers around the world use Pentera to guide remediation and close security gaps before they are exploited. For more info visit: pentera.io

    Equipped with FireEye frontline intelligence, the Verodin platform will measure and test security environments against both known and newly discovered threats, empowering organizations to identify risks in their security controls before a breach occurs, and rapidly adapt their defenses to the evolving threat landscape.

    Sample Customers
    Blackstone Group Caterpillar Apria Healthcare Taylor Vinters Sandler Capital Management Drawbridge BNP Paribas British Red Cross
    AAFCU, Amuse, Axway, Bank Gutmann, Bank of Thailand, BCC Corporation, Blackboat, CapWealth Advisors, CBC, CERN, Lagardère, Land Bank of the Philippines, laya healthcare, Lindsay Automotive Group
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Pentera is ranked 1st in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 5 reviews while Verodin is ranked 10th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Pentera is rated 8.2, while Verodin is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Pentera writes "A stable solution that can be used to do continuous and automated vulnerability assessments". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Verodin writes "Stable with good updates but needs a better integration engine". Pentera is most compared with Cymulate, Tenable Nessus, Picus Security, Horizon3.ai and Qualys VMDR, whereas Verodin is most compared with AttackIQ, Picus Security, Cymulate and SafeBreach.

    See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.

    We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.