We performed a comparison between Picus Security and Verodin based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)."You have the liberty of physically executing a specific set of rules in your environment."
"It's very useful software because the customer mostly configures their IPS and manages their firewalls, WAF, and the DBS according to the latest update, latest news, or according to the situation."
"One of the most valuable features would be the detection capability, specifically the ability to detect alarms and logs collected from SIEM tools."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its integration capabilities with the other security tools."
"The solution is constantly updating. Their data and security validation are cutting-edge."
"According to the attack vectors, you cannot specify which product is failing or which product is working well because there's no agent."
"The amount of integrations that the product can handle is an area of concern, making it one of the aspects where improvements are required."
"Let's say if a customer's environment has 10 security devices and they need to know that there is an attack that has bypassed their devices, they cannot go and inspect every device and every rule in their security devices."
"The reporting and data analysis could be improved. Specifically, the analysis of the results."
"The integration engine needs to improve."
Earn 20 points
Picus Security is ranked 3rd in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 4 reviews while Verodin is ranked 10th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Picus Security is rated 9.0, while Verodin is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Picus Security writes "Breach and attack simulation software that provides network, endpoint, and email vectors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Verodin writes "Stable with good updates but needs a better integration engine". Picus Security is most compared with Pentera, Cymulate, SafeBreach and AttackIQ, whereas Verodin is most compared with AttackIQ, Cymulate, Pentera and SafeBreach.
See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.
We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
