We performed a comparison between AttackIQ and XM Cyber based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)."Overall, I've had a good experience with the product. It's worked well for me."
"The platform's most valuable feature is attack simulation."
"What I personally like very much, from my experience, is that it is very reliable."
"The initial setup was quite difficult and took a long time."
"We'd like to see a cheaper price."
"XM Cyber could identify all areas of vulnerability. They could expand the identification span for different areas."
Earn 20 points
AttackIQ is ranked 7th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) while XM Cyber is ranked 5th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 2 reviews. AttackIQ is rated 7.0, while XM Cyber is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AttackIQ writes "Overall, a good user experience and works well but is hard to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of XM Cyber writes "Reliable with no false-positives and helpful support". AttackIQ is most compared with Pentera, Picus Security, SafeBreach, Cymulate and Verodin, whereas XM Cyber is most compared with Pentera, Cymulate, SafeBreach, Picus Security and Orca Security.
See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.
We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.