Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
AttackIQ Logo
1,973 views|1,309 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
XM Cyber Logo
2,111 views|1,079 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AttackIQ and XM Cyber based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS).
To learn more, read our detailed Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
NOUBOUM NOUBI BORIS HERMAN
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Overall, I've had a good experience with the product. It's worked well for me."

More AttackIQ Pros →

"The platform's most valuable feature is attack simulation.""What I personally like very much, from my experience, is that it is very reliable."

More XM Cyber Pros →

Cons
"The initial setup was quite difficult and took a long time."

More AttackIQ Cons →

"We'd like to see a cheaper price.""XM Cyber could identify all areas of vulnerability. They could expand the identification span for different areas."

More XM Cyber Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "We have to pay standard licensing fees."
  • More XM Cyber Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The platform's most valuable feature is attack simulation.
    Top Answer:We have to pay standard licensing fees. There are no additional costs. It is an expensive product. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.
    Top Answer:XM Cyber could identify all areas of vulnerability. They could expand the identification span for different areas.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,973
    Comparisons
    1,309
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    2,111
    Comparisons
    1,079
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    294
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Pentera logo
    Compared 25% of the time.
    Picus Security logo
    Compared 17% of the time.
    SafeBreach logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Cymulate logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Verodin logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Pentera logo
    Compared 30% of the time.
    Cymulate logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    SafeBreach logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Picus Security logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Orca Security logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    The AttackIQ platform enables continuous validation that your security controls, processes and people are working as intended and delivering ROI. It seamlessly integrates into any existing network, delivering immediate visibility into your security program so you can uncover gaps in coverage, identify misconfigurations, and quickly prioritize remediation efforts.

    XM Cyber is a leading hybrid cloud security company that’s changing the way innovative organizations approach cyber risk. Our attack path management platform continuously uncovers hidden attack paths to your critical assets across cloud and on-prem environments, so you can cut them off at key junctures and eradicate risk with a fraction of the effort. This overcomes the big disconnect that security teams experience when they’re presented with endless alerts, yet can’t see which exposures impact risk the most, how they come together to be exploited by an attacker, or how to efficiently eliminate them. This approach is a complete game-changer, which is why some of the world’s largest, most complex organizations choose XM Cyber to help eradicate risk. Founded by top executives from the Israeli cyber intelligence community, XM Cyber has offices in North America, Europe, and Israel.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Hamburg Port Authority, Plymouth Rock Corporation
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Buyer's Guide
    Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AttackIQ is ranked 7th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) while XM Cyber is ranked 5th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 2 reviews. AttackIQ is rated 7.0, while XM Cyber is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AttackIQ writes "Overall, a good user experience and works well but is hard to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of XM Cyber writes "Reliable with no false-positives and helpful support". AttackIQ is most compared with Pentera, Picus Security, SafeBreach, Cymulate and Verodin, whereas XM Cyber is most compared with Pentera, Cymulate, SafeBreach, Picus Security and Orca Security.

    See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.

    We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.