SCOM vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor comparison

Microsoft and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Microsoft is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.2, while SolarWinds is ranked #31 with an average rating of 7.6. Microsoft holds a 1.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to SolarWinds’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

SCOM

Read 83 SCOM reviews

9,977 Views
6,685 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Network Device M...

Read 23 SolarWinds Network Device Monitor reviews

3,271 Views
3,206 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

SCOM

SolarWinds Network Device M...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

SCOM and SolarWinds Network Device Monitor compete in IT monitoring. SCOM has an edge with robust Microsoft integration and flexible custom solutions. SolarWinds is user-friendly with simpler network monitoring capabilities.

Features: SCOM offers strong Microsoft technology monitoring, extensive management packs, and flexibility in creating custom solutions. It supports various systems like Windows, Unix, and network devices with comprehensive dashboards. SolarWinds provides effective network monitoring with customizable dashboards and is designed for ease of use but has less integration in Microsoft environments.

Room for Improvement: SCOM's pricing is high since it requires the entire System Center suite; it needs easier dashboard customization and better support for non-Microsoft products. SolarWinds should improve platform integration and reporting features, alongside developing AI-based issue resolution for better usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SCOM is mainly on-premises with some hybrid cloud features, benefiting from Microsoft's Premier Support for consistent assistance. SolarWinds also operates on-premises but offers greater flexibility with private and hybrid cloud options. Its support service is efficient yet could improve response times.

Pricing and ROI: SCOM, part of Microsoft's System Center, is often bundled in enterprise agreements, offering potential cost savings despite high initial costs. Its ROI includes proactive monitoring and reduced downtime. SolarWinds has variable pricing, potentially higher than alternatives, with ROI realized through immediate alerts and network management efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed SCOM vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

SCOM vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 903,257 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SCOM

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (2nd)

SolarWinds Network Device M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

31st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of SCOM is 1.5%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SCOM	1.5%
SolarWinds Network Device Monitor	0.9%
Other	97.6%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Akshita Kukreja

Assistant Manager at SMS group GmbH

Have integrated effective monitoring and seamless alerting with improved visualization capabilities

The most valuable feature of SCOM is its monitoring capability, and we have integrated SCOM with Grafana, which is a dashboarding tool. We have implemented and integrated this to create dashboarding of the SCOM monitoring system for the database, SQL, and the Linux servers we have configured in SCOM. We have created separate dashboarding for it, and the monitoring and creating rules and monitors in the management servers and management packs that SCOM provides are very useful for us. The alerting mechanism of SCOM has benefited our operations because we have modified the thresholds as per our internal requirements. We have configured threshold modifications for the CPU, memory, and especially for disk space. For routine disk space usage on the system, we have provided a separate threshold configuration.

Read full review

Sorin Gogean

IT Infrastructure Senior Network Technician at Autoliv

Offers some features but needs better customization and analysis tools

There are solutions that can perform better, but due to pricing for our corporate implementation, we had to stay with this solution. It accomplishes the necessary tasks, but there is room for improvement. The features are not as customizable as we would prefer, but they are workable. If configured properly, you can perform a drill-down analysis. However, I have not used this feature much for our infrastructure on the network side.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of SCOM is its monitoring capability, and we have integrated SCOM with Grafana, which is a dashboarding tool."

"The product’s auto-remediation feature helps with automation."

"On this solution, the things we monitor are fine and perhaps other users will want more, but for our purpose and what we use it for, it's enough."

"The feature I like most about SCOM is that it is easy-to-use."

"Alerts notify the server or service owner of problems, allowing quick decisions or actions to keep the service running based on configured thresholds."

"The product has helped our organization with in-depth monitoring."

"SCOM will allow you to go from firefighting mode to a more proactive stance when finding issues."

"It takes a lot of the headache out of managing your data centers and software in other places."

More SCOM pros

"Overall, I rate SolarWinds Network Device Monitor ten out of ten."

"The solution is very user-friendly and very easy to use."

"The most valuable feature of SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is it can alert you when a device is not working."

"I rate the product's initial setup process a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one means it is a difficult phase and ten is an easy process."

"SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is the best solution for closely monitoring how the link is performing when compared to ManageEngine OpManager."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"SolarWinds is flexible and works with multiple vendor devices."

"The Network Device Monitor itself is very useful."

More SolarWinds Network Device Monitor pros

Cons

"I’d like to see cross-platform support that would make SCOM a single enterprise monitoring application."

"Too small of a scope in reports, need to improve a lot."

"I find this product very clunky and not very intuitive to use, it took me a while to find my way around and understand where I needed to go to configure or even get a report is a bit complicated."

"In some ways, SCOM is a double-edged sword."

"All of the areas of reporting are very bad and need to be improved."

"The end-user components, including the dashboards, the administration console, and the web console, need to be improved."

"If it could have SysLog capabilities and if the Microsoft Management Packs were out of the box instead of a separate download."

"The dashboard features are not user-friendly for our management team, only for the technical department."

More SCOM cons

"The data is in the system but we are unable to pull it because reporting is not integrated and versatile."

"If everything were in the package so that everything was ready to go out of the box, that would be ideal."

"SolarWinds Network Device Monitor could improve by being more user-friendly. The network has so many features which make it difficult to find how to configure how to use it. It is not simple to customize."

"The initial setup of the SolarWinds Network Device Monitor could be easier. It took us approximately one month to complete the implementation."

"The security needs improvement, which is why we are moving away from Solar Winds. We have security concerns."

"The initial setup is a bit complex. It's not for anyone who is a beginner to work in the products to do it."

"The security could always be improved."

"When an organization's network grows, the complexity of the dashboard becomes an area of concern where improvements are required."

More SolarWinds Network Device Monitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a license needed to use this solution and it is paid annually."

"We have an EA with Microsoft, and it comes as part of the EA."

"SCOM's pricing is average."

"Our Enterprise Agreement includes the price."

"Our licensing fees are approximately $30 per user, per month."

"Two customers bought the enterprise agreement with Microsoft and paid for Software Assurance. But few customers don't buy it for Software Assurance. They just buy it and deploy it, and they think that we will be using it for the next five years."

"We have an enterprise agreement that includes this product as part of it."

"It is more expensive than the competition."

More SCOM pricing and cost advice

"The enterprise license is good for the SolarWinds Network Device Monitor. However, it is expensive, they should reduce their price."

"Thankfully, it doesn't take a lot of manpower to install and deploy."

"Well, we had a perpetual license and the renewal was $20 to $25,000."

"The price of the SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is good."

"The product is expensive."

"I find the cost of SolarWinds Network Device Monitor reasonable for our company. Though, I'm not aware of the exact licensing cost."

"SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is not an expensive solution."

"When compared with other solutions SolarWinds is more expensive."

More SolarWinds Network Device Monitor pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

903,257 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	54

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SCOM?

I am not aware of the exact pricing as it is managed by my supervisor. As an academic institution, we receive substantial discounts.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SCOM?

We believe that the dashboarding in SCOM needs to be improved or enhanced because it is not too expressive in reporting. We can work on deploying new ways of viewing things and modifying visualizat...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SCOM?

My usual use case for SCOM is as an administrator role where I create reports and provide system configuration for Linux and installation of the SCOM agent. I handle deploying and upgrading the age...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SolarWinds Network Device Monitor?

I am not a positive person regarding SolarWinds Network Device Monitor.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SolarWinds Network Device Monitor?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SolarWinds Network Device Monitor?

I have experience regarding the AD part, but my focus for the last 15 years has been oriented to the network side. My experience with identity tools comes more from a network perspective. We used N...

See all answers

Comparisons

Nagios XI vs SCOM

Compared 6% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs SCOM

Compared 6% of the time

Zabbix vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

LogicMonitor vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

More SCOM Competitors

Domotz Pro vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

Compared 11% of the time

ScienceLogic vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

FortiMonitor vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

OpenNMS vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More SolarWinds Network Device Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SCOM

June 2026

Download SCOM product report

Buyer's Guide

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

June 2026

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor report

Download SolarWinds Network Device Monitor product report

Also Known As

System Center Operations Manager, SCOM 2012

Network Device Monitor

Overview

SCOM monitors Microsoft environments with a focus on Windows servers and applications such as SQL, Exchange, and SharePoint. It offers integration with Active Directory and Azure, along with customizable dashboards, management packs, and robust alert mechanisms, aiding efficient management and control.

SCOM provides a comprehensive monitoring solution for Microsoft technologies, helping organizations track performance and availability of applications, services, and infrastructure. It integrates with Active Directory and Azure, offering capabilities for monitoring Windows and Linux environments. Extensive management packs, customizable dashboards, and automated alerts offer a refined monitoring experience. Users benefit from detailed performance data, network monitoring, and auto-discovery features, enhancing operational insights and server management efficiency.

What are key features of SCOM?

Microsoft Environment Monitoring: Specialized for Windows servers and applications such as SQL, Exchange, and SharePoint.
Integration Capabilities: Seamless integration with Active Directory and Azure for streamlined operations.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailor visual data displays to enhance monitoring and decision-making.
Extensive Management Packs: Broad range of management packs for enhanced resource and application control.
Robust Alert Mechanisms: Comprehensive alerting to maintain service stability and address potential issues promptly.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Enhanced management of server applications and infrastructure.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Detailed insights into performance and service availability.
Proactive Issue Notification: Timely alerts for quick issue resolution.
Improved Control: More efficient server management through automation and visibility.

In technology sectors, SCOM is widely implemented for its ability to monitor server applications and infrastructure components. Healthcare and finance utilize its monitoring and alert systems for compliance and uptime. Enterprises integrate SCOM for managing complex systems like Exchange, SharePoint, and Active Directory, enabling comprehensive analytics and reporting.

Microsoft

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor offers comprehensive real-time network monitoring capabilities with seamless integration across multiple vendor devices, ensuring efficient network operations.

Offering features like cloud workload monitoring, quick deployment, and a user-friendly interface, SolarWinds Network Device Monitor supports real-time alert thresholds, accurate link readings, historical utilization metrics, and customizable dashboards. Its ability to integrate with multiple vendor devices and perform network discovery enhances operational efficiency. Comprehensive bandwidth and fault management features provide stable network monitoring, benefiting devices such as switches and IP phones. However, there is room for improvement in integration with tools like ServiceNow and Excel, support response times, and enhanced security. Users highlight the need for a mobile version, improved reporting, and better customization options, alongside concerns about setup complexity and licensing costs.

What are the key features?

Cloud Workload Monitoring: Monitors workloads hosted in the cloud.
User-Friendly Interface: Offers an intuitive experience for users.
Quick Deployment: Simplifies installation and setup processes.
Real-Time Monitoring: Provides immediate alerts for network statuses.
Customizable Dashboards: Enhances network visibility with tailored displays.

What benefits can users expect?

Proactive Problem Solving: Real-time alerts facilitate quick issue resolution.
Efficiency: Automated network monitoring streamlines operational workflows.
Insightful Analytics: Provides valuable data on memory and CPU usage.
Cost-Effective: Monitors bandwidth and fault management to reduce outages.

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is implemented prominently in industries needing robust network infrastructure monitoring, like tech and manufacturing. Companies rely on its capabilities for IP address management, cloud workload monitoring, and remote equipment monitoring, gaining insights into system performance and ensuring compliance checks are met effectively.

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

Dialog Telekom

Air Rarotonga

Buyer's Guide

SCOM vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

June 2026

Free Report: SCOM vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about SCOM vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

903,257 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SCOM vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.