SCOM vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Microsoft and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Microsoft is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.7, while SolarWinds is ranked #39 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 1.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to SolarWinds’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

SCOM

Read 83 SCOM reviews

11,172 Views
7,485 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Network Device M...

Read 23 SolarWinds Network Device Monitor reviews

3,789 Views
3,713 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

SCOM

SolarWinds Network Device M...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

SCOM and SolarWinds Network Device Monitor compete in IT monitoring. SCOM has an edge with robust Microsoft integration and flexible custom solutions. SolarWinds is user-friendly with simpler network monitoring capabilities.

Features: SCOM offers strong Microsoft technology monitoring, extensive management packs, and flexibility in creating custom solutions. It supports various systems like Windows, Unix, and network devices with comprehensive dashboards. SolarWinds provides effective network monitoring with customizable dashboards and is designed for ease of use but has less integration in Microsoft environments.

Room for Improvement: SCOM's pricing is high since it requires the entire System Center suite; it needs easier dashboard customization and better support for non-Microsoft products. SolarWinds should improve platform integration and reporting features, alongside developing AI-based issue resolution for better usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SCOM is mainly on-premises with some hybrid cloud features, benefiting from Microsoft's Premier Support for consistent assistance. SolarWinds also operates on-premises but offers greater flexibility with private and hybrid cloud options. Its support service is efficient yet could improve response times.

Pricing and ROI: SCOM, part of Microsoft's System Center, is often bundled in enterprise agreements, offering potential cost savings despite high initial costs. Its ROI includes proactive monitoring and reduced downtime. SolarWinds has variable pricing, potentially higher than alternatives, with ROI realized through immediate alerts and network management efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed SCOM vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

SCOM vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 912,069 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SCOM

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

24th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (5th)

SolarWinds Network Device M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

39th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of SCOM is 1.4%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SCOM	1.4%
SolarWinds Network Device Monitor	0.8%
Other	97.8%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Akshita Kukreja

Assistant Manager at SMS group GmbH

Have integrated effective monitoring and seamless alerting with improved visualization capabilities

The most valuable feature of SCOM is its monitoring capability, and we have integrated SCOM with Grafana, which is a dashboarding tool. We have implemented and integrated this to create dashboarding of the SCOM monitoring system for the database, SQL, and the Linux servers we have configured in SCOM. We have created separate dashboarding for it, and the monitoring and creating rules and monitors in the management servers and management packs that SCOM provides are very useful for us. The alerting mechanism of SCOM has benefited our operations because we have modified the thresholds as per our internal requirements. We have configured threshold modifications for the CPU, memory, and especially for disk space. For routine disk space usage on the system, we have provided a separate threshold configuration.

Read full review

Sorin Gogean

IT Infrastructure Senior Network Technician at Autoliv

Offers some features but needs better customization and analysis tools

There are solutions that can perform better, but due to pricing for our corporate implementation, we had to stay with this solution. It accomplishes the necessary tasks, but there is room for improvement. The features are not as customizable as we would prefer, but they are workable. If configured properly, you can perform a drill-down analysis. However, I have not used this feature much for our infrastructure on the network side.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution saves us a lot of work because it reduces the effort that is required in order to start monitoring."

"It would have to be the ability to monitor services, devices, and operations for many devices from a single console leveraging a wide variety of Management Packs available."

"When it comes to monitoring Microsoft servers, it is very useful."

"The most valuable features for us are the monitoring, the health explorer, and the console."

"Availability monitoring is the feature I have found most valuable, as well as the capacity and ability to send notifications."

"It discovers the components automatically, which is a fantastic thing."

"Proactive monitoring has helped us prepare and mitigate potential issues before they even happen."

"We like the deployment of the machines and the features that they have, and it's easy to use."

More SCOM pros

"We are doing more with SolarWinds Network Device Monitor than we were doing in the past with WhatsApp Gold; when we moved to SolarWinds Network Device Monitor, the whole observability part started to grow."

"The product is useful for switches and IP phones."

"The most valuable feature of SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is it can alert you when a device is not working."

"SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is a straightforward product with valuable functionality."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The solution is very user-friendly and very easy to use."

"You can create an attractive dashboard and create a hierarchy."

"Overall, it is a good user experience and the dashboards are very usable."

More SolarWinds Network Device Monitor pros

Cons

"They can focus more on cloud monitoring instead of on-premise monitoring. We should be able to monitor cloud-related applications. They can include this feature in the next release. If it is in the cloud, we can have scalability by using Kubernetes. The container is containerized, packaged, and managed using Kubernetes. This feature is not there in SCOM. Going forward, if they can focus on that, it will be great."

"In some ways, SCOM is a double-edged sword."

"The interface is a little bit cumbersome and certain actions could be simplified."

"The solution’s initial setup is difficult."

"Too small of a scope in reports, need to improve a lot."

"SCOM is always known to be very unstable when it comes to SCOM Agents which are installed locally on all the servers."

"The solution can be improved by expanding to cloud usage."

"Non Windows monitoring is fairly weak. Network device monitoring is not reliable."

More SCOM cons

"The solution is not user-friendly."

"Integration with different tools, such as ServiceNow and Excel, can be improved."

"The security could always be improved."

"There were certain aspects that weren't supported exactly. I was just able to monitor some basic things."

"In terms of price, it could be less expensive."

"The initial setup is a bit complex. It's not for anyone who is a beginner to work in the products to do it."

"Technical support needs to respond to its customers faster. We are not 100% satisfied with the level of support we get."

"SolarWinds Network Device Monitor could improve the features. We don't have the complete model for the database, and the monitoring for the database is up and down. We expect that we could monitor the blocking items on the database but we don't have that feature."

More SolarWinds Network Device Monitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing fees are approximately $30 per user, per month."

"If you have a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement, then this is part of the agreement."

"SCOM is very cheap because it's included in the license for the System Center suite, which is around $8,400 per CAL."

"We have to pay for a license and the price is fine for us."

"We have an EA with Microsoft, and it comes as part of the EA."

"Our Enterprise Agreement includes the price."

"I don't know the exact cost because it's managed by our sales team, but Microsoft is on the higher side."

"The pricing and licensing are fair."

More SCOM pricing and cost advice

"I rate the product's price as three to three and a half or on a scale of one to ten, where one means low price, and ten means high price."

"The price of the SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is good."

"When compared with other solutions SolarWinds is more expensive."

"The enterprise license is good for the SolarWinds Network Device Monitor. However, it is expensive, they should reduce their price."

"SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is not an expensive solution."

"The product is expensive."

"Well, we had a perpetual license and the renewal was $20 to $25,000."

"Thankfully, it doesn't take a lot of manpower to install and deploy."

More SolarWinds Network Device Monitor pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

912,069 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	54

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SCOM?

I am not aware of the exact pricing as it is managed by my supervisor. As an academic institution, we receive substantial discounts.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SCOM?

We believe that the dashboarding in SCOM needs to be improved or enhanced because it is not too expressive in reporting. We can work on deploying new ways of viewing things and modifying visualizat...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SCOM?

My usual use case for SCOM is as an administrator role where I create reports and provide system configuration for Linux and installation of the SCOM agent. I handle deploying and upgrading the age...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SolarWinds Network Device Monitor?

I am not a positive person regarding SolarWinds Network Device Monitor.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SolarWinds Network Device Monitor?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SolarWinds Network Device Monitor?

I have experience regarding the AD part, but my focus for the last 15 years has been oriented to the network side. My experience with identity tools comes more from a network perspective. We used N...

See all answers

Comparisons

Nagios XI vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

Zabbix vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs SCOM

Compared 4% of the time

LogicMonitor vs SCOM

Compared 4% of the time

More SCOM Competitors

Domotz Pro vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

FortiMonitor vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

ScienceLogic vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

More SolarWinds Network Device Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SCOM

August 2026

Download SCOM product report

Buyer's Guide

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

August 2026

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor report

Download SolarWinds Network Device Monitor product report

Also Known As

System Center Operations Manager, SCOM 2012

Network Device Monitor

Overview

SCOM monitors Microsoft environments with a focus on Windows servers and applications such as SQL, Exchange, and SharePoint. It offers integration with Active Directory and Azure, along with customizable dashboards, management packs, and robust alert mechanisms, aiding efficient management and control.

SCOM provides a comprehensive monitoring solution for Microsoft technologies, helping organizations track performance and availability of applications, services, and infrastructure. It integrates with Active Directory and Azure, offering capabilities for monitoring Windows and Linux environments. Extensive management packs, customizable dashboards, and automated alerts offer a refined monitoring experience. Users benefit from detailed performance data, network monitoring, and auto-discovery features, enhancing operational insights and server management efficiency.

What are key features of SCOM?

Microsoft Environment Monitoring: Specialized for Windows servers and applications such as SQL, Exchange, and SharePoint.
Integration Capabilities: Seamless integration with Active Directory and Azure for streamlined operations.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailor visual data displays to enhance monitoring and decision-making.
Extensive Management Packs: Broad range of management packs for enhanced resource and application control.
Robust Alert Mechanisms: Comprehensive alerting to maintain service stability and address potential issues promptly.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Enhanced management of server applications and infrastructure.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Detailed insights into performance and service availability.
Proactive Issue Notification: Timely alerts for quick issue resolution.
Improved Control: More efficient server management through automation and visibility.

In technology sectors, SCOM is widely implemented for its ability to monitor server applications and infrastructure components. Healthcare and finance utilize its monitoring and alert systems for compliance and uptime. Enterprises integrate SCOM for managing complex systems like Exchange, SharePoint, and Active Directory, enabling comprehensive analytics and reporting.

Microsoft

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor offers comprehensive real-time network monitoring capabilities with seamless integration across multiple vendor devices, ensuring efficient network operations.

Offering features like cloud workload monitoring, quick deployment, and a user-friendly interface, SolarWinds Network Device Monitor supports real-time alert thresholds, accurate link readings, historical utilization metrics, and customizable dashboards. Its ability to integrate with multiple vendor devices and perform network discovery enhances operational efficiency. Comprehensive bandwidth and fault management features provide stable network monitoring, benefiting devices such as switches and IP phones. However, there is room for improvement in integration with tools like ServiceNow and Excel, support response times, and enhanced security. Users highlight the need for a mobile version, improved reporting, and better customization options, alongside concerns about setup complexity and licensing costs.

What are the key features?

Cloud Workload Monitoring: Monitors workloads hosted in the cloud.
User-Friendly Interface: Offers an intuitive experience for users.
Quick Deployment: Simplifies installation and setup processes.
Real-Time Monitoring: Provides immediate alerts for network statuses.
Customizable Dashboards: Enhances network visibility with tailored displays.

What benefits can users expect?

Proactive Problem Solving: Real-time alerts facilitate quick issue resolution.
Efficiency: Automated network monitoring streamlines operational workflows.
Insightful Analytics: Provides valuable data on memory and CPU usage.
Cost-Effective: Monitors bandwidth and fault management to reduce outages.

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is implemented prominently in industries needing robust network infrastructure monitoring, like tech and manufacturing. Companies rely on its capabilities for IP address management, cloud workload monitoring, and remote equipment monitoring, gaining insights into system performance and ensuring compliance checks are met effectively.

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

Dialog Telekom

Air Rarotonga

Buyer's Guide

SCOM vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

September 2026

Free Report: SCOM vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about SCOM vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

912,069 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SCOM vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.