ScienceLogic vs Stackify comparison

ScienceLogic and Stackify are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. ScienceLogic is ranked #18 with an average rating of 9.0, while Stackify is ranked #67. ScienceLogic holds a 1.8% mindshare in IM, compared to Stackify’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of ScienceLogic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Stackify users who would recommend it.

ScienceLogic

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

9,504 Views
4,752 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Stackify

Read 6 Stackify reviews

3,273 Views
1,407 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

ScienceLogic

Stackify

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ScienceLogic and Stackify compete in the IT management and monitoring category. ScienceLogic seems to have the upper hand in scalability and flexibility, making it suitable for larger organizations, while Stackify focuses on application performance monitoring, appealing to development teams.

Features: ScienceLogic's notable features include hybrid IT management, extensive monitoring capabilities, and AI-driven analytics. Stackify offers application performance monitoring, error tracking, and log management.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could improve its ease of deployment for smaller teams, simplify its user interface, and reduce its initial setup complexity. Stackify may enhance its scalability for larger environments, expand its integration capabilities, and increase the depth of its monitoring features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic provides a robust deployment model for complex environments, requiring significant effort, with customer service efficient in handling queries. Stackify offers simpler deployment for development-focused teams with straightforward integration and proactive support.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic involves higher setup costs but offers extensive features with significant ROI for large-scale deployments. Stackify presents a cost-effective solution with lower initial expenses and substantial value for development teams needing detailed application insights.

To learn more, read our detailed ScienceLogic vs. Stackify Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic vs. Stackify

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ScienceLogic

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

18th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (6th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Network Monitoring Software (28th), Server Monitoring (11th), IT Operations Analytics (8th), Cloud Monitoring Software (13th), AIOps (13th)

Stackify

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

67th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (58th), Log Management (57th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.8%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Stackify is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ScienceLogic	1.8%
Stackify	0.7%
Other	97.5%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Pallagani Siva Koteswararao

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

Comprehensive monitoring streamlines operations with room for user support enhancement

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support team. Whenever we encounter difficulties, I raise vendor cases and am eager to deepen my understanding of those cases. Additionally, I want to learn more about ScienceLogic's dashboards, which display crucial metrics about collectors, their health, and devices aligned to them. The dashboard should be more detailed. Regarding improvements to ScienceLogic's technical support, my last company was IBM in India, and I worked on IBM MQ monitoring until my last day. I engaged with the LogicMonitor support team for MQ-level incidents, but these issues remained unresolved even after 10 to 15 days. On my last working day, I assisted with one such vendor case, and I am unsure if that issue was ever resolved. ScienceLogic's technical support should respond more efficiently in terms of time. During my time working on MQ-level cases, including a power pack upgrade that did not fix the issues faced, I provided all necessary steps with the help of the middleware team. However, there were still gaps that needed addressing.

Read full review

Idoko Emmanuel

Senior Software Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has good filtering and rating features and helps with resource and load management

I've not used Stackify for a while, and I'm currently using a solution now that's not as good as Stackify. Among the solutions I've been using so far, Stackify has been one of the best for me, but there's always room for improvement. For example, I don't know if it's just me, but when I try to get the log from Stackify, sometimes it doesn't appear in real-time. It takes a few minutes before the logs appear. When I redeploy my solution and the application starts, I don't see the logs immediately, and it would take two to three minutes before I see the logs. I don't know if other customers have a similar experience. It's the wait time for the logs to appear that's a concern for me, could be improved, and is what the Stackify team should be looking into. In terms of any additional feature that I'd like added to the solution, I'm not sure if Stackify has a way to export logs out. I've been trying to do it. On the solution, you can click on a spiral-like icon and it shows you the entire error, and I'd prefer an export button that would let me download the error and save that into a text file, for example, so it'll be available on my local machine for me to reference it, especially because the log keeps going and as you're using the solution, the system keeps pushing messages on to Stackify, so if I'm looking at a particular error at 12:05 PM, for example, by the time I go back to my system and would like to revisit the error at 12:25 PM, on Stackify, the logs would have gone past that level and I won't see it again which makes it difficult. When you now go back to that timestamp, you don't tend to see it immediately, but if the solution had an export feature for me to save that particular error information on my local machine for reference at a later time, I won't have to go back to Stackify. I just go to that log, specifically to that particular export that I've received on my local machine. I can get it and review it, and it would be easier that way versus me going back to Stackify to find that particular error and request that particular information.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We were able to increase the monitoring coverage of both our legacy and public cloud based infrastructures, while also cutting costs by over $2 million across a five year period."

"Web monitoring, service and processes monitoring have saved and prevented more than just one outage."

"Since it is a SaaS-based product, the setup is not very difficult."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities."

"Their customer service is unparalleled."

"I recommend ScienceLogic to other users."

"Customer Service is fantastic."

"We lacked the power or features that the EM7 dashboards provide, and have won more than one account based on that alone."

More ScienceLogic pros

"My advice to anyone who wants to use Stackify is to go for it because my experience with it is good."

"The deployment is very fast."

"What stood out to us were the metrics and granular details we received."

"The solution is stable and reliable."

"The performance dashboard and the accurate level of details are beneficial."

"The filter feature on Stackify is one of the features I found valuable. It's awesome. When I want to get the application logs, the solution gives me many filters. For example, if I want to get logs from my test environment, the option is there for me to select the environment from Stackify, and you can also select the particular application, and you'll see the information you need there. The filter feature alone and the fact that Stackify offers a lot of different filters is what I like the most about the solution because I've used other tools with the filter feature, but the filtering was very difficult, versus Stackify that has good filtering. On Stackify, you can filter the information by the last one hour, or the last four hours, and you can also select the date range and specify the timestamp, then the solution will give you the information based on the date range you specified. Another feature I found valuable on Stackify is its rating feature because it tells you how your application is faring. For example, a rating of A means excellent, while a rating of F means very bad, or that your application is not doing well at all. The ratings are from A to F. I also like that Stackify helps you in terms of load management because the solution gives you information on overutilized resources. These are the most valuable features of the solution."

"Within few hours of install we've identify the source of issue we've been investigating for few days and couldn't pin point."

"We switched from New Relic and Loggly as it provides us more info at a lower price."

More Stackify pros

Cons

"The UI takes a bit to learn but once you get past that it gets the job done."

"There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks."

"Admins do not have direct access to the reporting."

"They should improve database issues in HA and Failover mode, and provide documentation for all users , even if they are not customers."

"ScienceLogic could improve the implementation, it could be made easier."

"Before ScienceLogic, our monitoring was fairly difficult to do. We were kind of limited in our capabilities."

"ScienceLogic does not have application monitoring. We definitely need something integrated within ScienceLogic to monitor applications so that we don't have to rely on monitoring tools to monitor other applications. At least the ones that are market leaders, such as SAP, Oracle, and others."

"They should improve their support process and add chat."

More ScienceLogic cons

"One thing that happens as a new user on Stackify is when you install the agent it pulls everything and if you're not careful, your log allowance will just be exhausted as you are actually pulling too much data."

"I would like to be able to see metrics about individual running containers on the host machines."

"I'm looking to see more performance tools, but heard that they are going to release some."

"It's not easy to set up. It's hard especially for juniors to understand."

"I've not used Stackify for a while, and I'm currently using a solution now that's not as good as Stackify. Among the solutions I've been using so far, Stackify has been one of the best for me, but there's always room for improvement. For example, I don't know if it's just me, but when I try to get the log from Stackify, sometimes it doesn't appear in real-time. It takes a few minutes before the logs appear. When I redeploy my solution and the application starts, I don't see the logs immediately, and it would take two to three minutes before I see the logs. I don't know if other customers have a similar experience. It's the wait time for the logs to appear that's a concern for me, could be improved, and is what the Stackify team should be looking into. In terms of any additional feature that I'd like added to the solution, I'm not sure if Stackify has a way to export logs out. I've been trying to do it. On the solution, you can click on a spiral-like icon and it shows you the entire error, and I'd prefer an export button that would let me download the error and save that into a text file, for example, so it'll be available on my local machine for me to reference it, especially because the log keeps going and as you're using the solution, the system keeps pushing messages on to Stackify, so if I'm looking at a particular error at 12:05 PM, for example, by the time I go back to my system and would like to revisit the error at 12:25 PM, on Stackify, the logs would have gone past that level and I won't see it again which makes it difficult. When you now go back to that timestamp, you don't tend to see it immediately, but if the solution had an export feature for me to save that particular error information on my local machine for reference at a later time, I won't have to go back to Stackify. I just go to that log, specifically to that particular export that I've received on my local machine. I can get it and review it, and it would be easier that way versus me going back to Stackify to find that particular error and request that particular information."

"When I redeploy my solution and the application starts, I don't see the logs immediately, and it would take two to three minutes before I see the logs."

"It should be easily scalable and configurable in different instances."

"The search feature could be improved."

More Stackify cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

"The price is variable. It depends on how much data we have received in that particular month. Usually, it goes up to $2,000, or, at times, $3,000 USD per month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

Government

Construction Company

21%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Media Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	27

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ScienceLogic?

Our usual use case of ScienceLogic is as a strategic monitoring tool for all the customers in our company, and because of that reason, all the accounts and projects are migrated from other monitori...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ScienceLogic

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs ScienceLogic

Compared 4% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs ScienceLogic

Compared 3% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

New Relic vs Stackify

Compared 7% of the time

Dynatrace vs Stackify

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Stackify

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText SiteScope vs Stackify

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Stackify

Compared 4% of the time

More Stackify Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic

June 2026

Download ScienceLogic product report

Buyer's Guide

Stackify

June 2026

Download Stackify product report

Overview

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

ScienceLogic

Stackify enhances application performance monitoring with features like detailed logging and effective filtering options, integrating capabilities to eliminate the need for multiple tools, and providing rapid deployment and stable performance.

Stackify offers a comprehensive solution for business insight through custom dashboards, error monitoring, load management, and application scoring. Its ability to visualize performance by creating responsive dashboards helps connect business and technical teams. Despite its strengths, users seek improvements such as better mobile support, real-time log appearance, and Docker documentation. Enhanced Linux support and agent memory optimization are also desired, along with better visibility into container and application performance metrics. Integrating more plugins and options would make Stackify a more robust monitoring tool.

What are the key features of Stackify?

Detailed Log and Error Data: Provides in-depth traces and logs for error and data analysis.
Custom Dashboards: Offers business insights and application scoring through tailored dashboards.
Performance Metrics: Monitors application and server performance effectively.
Simple Configuration: Ensures easier setup and deployment without complexities.
Filtering Options: Enables effective management of logs and errors through filters.

What benefits should be expected from using Stackify?

Improved Performance Monitoring: Provides tools to identify root causes and enhance application and server monitoring.
Resource Management: Manages server utilization and handles resource spikes efficiently.
Proactive Alerts: Allows setting up alerts across platforms like AWS and Docker.
Log Aggregation: Compiles logs for testing and analysis to improve system performance.

Organizations across industries use Stackify for extensive application performance monitoring, particularly in testing environments. It is crucial for analyzing database calls, third-party requests, and aggregating logs. Its capabilities in monitoring across AWS and Docker environments make it especially valuable for dynamic and distributed infrastructures.

Stackify

Sample Customers

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

MyRacePass, ClearSale, Newitts, Carbonite, Boston Software, Children's International, Starkwood Media Group, Fewzion

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic vs. Stackify

June 2026

Free Report: ScienceLogic vs. Stackify

Find out what your peers are saying about ScienceLogic vs. Stackify and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ScienceLogic vs. Stackify report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.