SAP Signavio Process Manager vs TIBCO Business Studio comparison

"We can use workflow manager to create forms."

"I like the collaboration and the real-time aspects of it."

"The most valuable feature for me is the collaboration point of view, where everybody has a single view, or source of truth, and everybody sees the same thing. Everyone can comment, contribute, and discuss the processes itself, which makes it easier to funnel down the most value adding comments and make the relevant changes to the processes. This leads to the next best iteration or version of your process."

"This product has helped us to work within standards for process planning."

"Process management/Process governance is what we think Signavio is very good at."

"When comparing my experience with Celonis and Signavio, I can discern the distinctions between these two platforms. However, I'm unable to differentiate between ARAs and add-ons, as that falls outside my scope of familiarity. Regarding Celonis, it comes with its set of advantages and disadvantages. Notably, it boasts robust features like action flows, task mining, and seamless integration with AML programming. Conversely, Signavio lacks action flows and instead relies on action segments and tasks for interaction. This discrepancy is a significant factor setting Selenium and SecureView apart. In the context of Signavio, it offers a combination of BPMN and process discovery, a feature absent in Celonis. This tandem of BPMN and process insight contributes to Signavio’S potency. Meanwhile, Celonis primarily features the process miner tool, setting it apart from Signavio. These variations collectively outline the numerous differences existing between Celonis and Signavio."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the portal for spreading it over the organization, the usability, and the workflow generator in the background."

"The solution is user-friendly."

"The setup cost is definitely reasonable."

"The setup cost is definitely reasonable."

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."

"It is sometimes difficult to find the match between what is possible and what is wanted, or what is helpful with the product, so better documentation may assist in this regard."

"For us, it would help a lot if this solution had floating licenses."

"If you're going to use the tool the way I'm using it, which is to work with businesses and capture what they're thinking, it would be helpful to be able to insert other objects onto a diagram."

"The workflow automation of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"SAP Signavio Process Manager needs better automatic rendering of data."

"It could use a better user interface, one that is more efficient."

"If you start from scratch then I think this product would be ideal, but if you already have something then it may or may not suit you."

"The reporting is too slow and there is a limit of 250 processes."

"An artificial intelligence feature that evaluates the quality of the code developed with one click would definitely be good."

"An artificial intelligence feature that evaluates the quality of the code developed with one click would definitely be good."

"The interface is actually quite confusing."

"SAP Signavio charges a lot of money."

"The product is expensive."

"It is expensive. The license is monthly."

"Comparatively, it is a bit costly when you look at similar tools with similar features."

"Although Signavio is a feature-rich solution, it is expensive for companies who haven’t reached a certain maturity level in their process management initiatives."

"The solution is quite expensive compared to other vendors."

"I think we're spending about $150,000 a year on licensing costs."

"We are using the free trial version."

"For my company, the tool costs about 2,0,000 Euros for three years...If one is bad and ten is good, I rate the price as one out of ten."