Bizagi vs TIBCO Business Studio comparison

"It improves visibility and quality, and basically, it avoids human errors."

"Its cost is the most valuable. It is not as expensive. It is also easy to make different types of processes for the users."

"It can be useful as a tool to improve your communications and the control of your processes. For example, when you have to explain a process to seven or eight stakeholders who think differently as well as have different experiences in different functional departments, it is not easy. Sometimes you are using a lot of technical terms, and other times, you are dealing with management terminology. The visual representation helps you create a better alignment and understanding for different roles and stakeholders of your workforce."

"I like the business process management engine. It's very detailed, and you can probably map any of the corporate workflow processes you come across in it compared to some of the other solutions out there. I can probably say that it has very good support to work in tandem with other RP solutions in the market. The software is still very user-friendly and integral, and they have pretty good online resources. The automation feature is pretty good, so is the integration feature."

"Great mapping feature that's easy to use."

"The product has a comfortable GUI and a good environment for users."

"Very, very stable."

"Bizagi is very simple and easy to use, which I find most valuable, as it allows users to create clean and neat process maps."

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."

"The setup cost is definitely reasonable."

"The setup cost is definitely reasonable."

"There could be more documentation."

"I would like to see simulation as a free feature again. In version 3.3 it was free, but in 4.0 it isn't."

"It needs some better notation functionality."

"Framework approach, which extends to reusability in tools, like Pega, for deployment management could be improved."

"The solution is a bit heavy on resources and has slowed down my computer."

"It needs an easier setup for the Bizagi Engine."

"The technical support is not fast enough and should be improved."

"Bizagi has been aggressively adding features to maintain its market-leading position, however, in some cases, this has impacted the stability of certain product builds."

"An artificial intelligence feature that evaluates the quality of the code developed with one click would definitely be good."

"An artificial intelligence feature that evaluates the quality of the code developed with one click would definitely be good."

"The interface is actually quite confusing."

"This solution would be expensive for a company that has a lot of users."

"The product must improve its cost."

"We didn't use the licensed versions where you could exactly go into automatization. However, we looked at the pricing in the beginning, and the only thing that I remember is that it was too expensive for the things we were using because our clients would also have to license the product. One client said that it was too expensive for the benefit they get out of it."

"We have no issues with the pricing."

"It is on par with other BPM tools, but not as expensive as Pega nor Appian."

"Its price is reasonable."

"The modeling part of the software is free. Most of the time, it is used for this purpose."

"When we were working with the on-premises solution, the licenses were a little bit expensive because we had to buy one by one a package of a hundred licenses, whereas now, we are working with the cloud solution, and it has a different cost. It's a different business model because we pay the license for the developers, but the cost is by the environment, and we have unlimited licenses. The business model is different now, but the benefit ratio is good."

"For my company, the tool costs about 2,0,000 Euros for three years...If one is bad and ten is good, I rate the price as one out of ten."