We performed a comparison between Camunda and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I can use any other tools to create services and the UI, and then use them together with the Camunda BPMN engine."
"Overall, the solution has been very solid."
"It is very user-friendly compared to IBM BPM. It's much simpler – it's more streamlined. That means even non-technical departments can use it."
"We have the ability to modify the product if we need to, and that comes in handy whenever we need to add new functionality and features."
", Camunda can be a powerful tool to work with when used in an optimized and well-implemented manner."
"Its flexibility stands out as the most valuable feature."
"When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version."
"It is simple to use. The user experience is very good."
"As a business transformation suite, Signavio offers a number of integrated helpful tools. The Process Modeler helps with the conceptual work, but is directly integrated with the components of the Workflow Accelerator (Automation) and the Process Intelligence (Mining). This makes Signavio an indispensable service package."
"The fact that the repository is available on the web is the most valuable feature. It's a very simple tool. If you can use something simple and visual, you should be able to use the model as well in Signavio. It has the ability, for example, to track versioning control, so if you make updates to the processes, you have the ability to track the versions as well."
"All in all, Signavio usability is excellent. Anyone can learn to use the tool quickly. This increases acceptance as employees are not facing a high learning curve. With the offered usability it is easy to model processes also live in workshops."
"The Signavio tool is very easy to use and it is one of the reasons why I like it."
"I really like the Collaboration Hub because it's so easy to communicate. And what is really important is that you can use it asynchronously. It doesn't matter if you're working in Italy or in America. You are using the same process and you can speak about the same process."
"The solution provides data mining and AI features."
"The collaboration hub, which helps us in terms of being able to communicate with our customers, brings everybody into the tool and close to the process, allowing them to comment and to implement their own processes."
"It is possible to do the whole drafting process at the same time in Sagnavio so you don't have a double effort of writing it once, arranging it and entering it again."
"We have faced problems with the performance."
"I have faced problems in bringing up the Cockpit in terms of GUI processes. I think that there is room for improvement in those areas."
"The only drawback is the time that it takes to have a complete set of workflows implemented on the Camunda platform."
"In terms of features, it meets my needs, but I would like Camunda to have an office in Brazil and provide training in Portuguese. They should provide regional support and training courses in Portuguese."
"The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it."
"Community support is basically what I'm looking for. Other than that, it is okay for now."
"When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved."
"I'm from the .NET world and I would like to use it, rather than Java."
"The tool's navigation could be improved."
"Being able to integrate the Workflow Accelerator with more products would be good."
"There is always room for improvement is the capability of integration with other solutions."
"If you're going to use the tool the way I'm using it, which is to work with businesses and capture what they're thinking, it would be helpful to be able to insert other objects onto a diagram."
"SAP Signavio Process Manager's UI is not user-friendly. Its pricing is also high."
"There are some small graphical bugs, but they are addressed immediately by Signavio to their product development team."
"There are a few bugs when you use the Microsoft Surface Hub with the big screen."
"I think the biggest selling point that Signavio talks about is its collaborative aspect. However, there's still a lot more improvement in terms of what they can do, how they receive comments, address comments, whether they actually provide feedback, etc. There is still a little bit more improvement to be made on those areas."
Camunda is ranked 2nd in Business Process Design with 69 reviews while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 6th in Business Process Design with 57 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Nintex Process Platform, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Visio, ADONIS and UiPath Process Mining. See our Camunda vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors and best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
