"We need to analyze documents in order to understand them. We don't need to dedicate much time to this because WorkFusion's machine learning capabilities are very good. We can easily extract information and classify these documents. The document processing engine is very important to our organization because it is the center for many use cases, as we need to control the information contained in documents."
"We recommend different solutions based on our customers' needs, and WorkFusion is what we offer for those who need a premium solution."
"It takes care of simple tasks so users can focus more on exceptions than on regular use cases. They only focus on orders where they need to handle an exception, some information was not given, or there is an issue that they had to focus on. The rest of it goes straight through without human touch. We want to see our employees as engineers, wherein they think and solve problems, not necessarily have to do repetitive tasks. I think WorkFusion helps with avoiding repetitive tasks."
"The cognitive features of this solution are good."
"The Robotic Desktop Automation Express component allows us to do rapid development outside the normal, time-consuming processes."
"It really does help by either freeing up people's time to focus on more value-added tasks or reducing headcount. We generally have other things that we can get people to do, helping make the employees' work more meaningful since they are not having to do the mundane stuff."
"The solution is stable, we have not had any glitches or problems."
"A helpful feature is the analytics capability within WorkFusion. The analytics dashboards, i.e., their Tableau dashboards, are really helpful for building a business activity monitoring layer. These are very visible to senior management and stakeholders, who can see and know what is happening within processes. They can see what benefits are getting delivered as processes, either ;daily, weekly, monthly, or quarterly. It is easy for stakeholders or senior management to understand the value for the money that they are spending."
"The most valuable feature of SAP Contextor is that everyone is in one place in the program that I need."
"The technical support is good."
"The best feature is that it doesn't require any other connectivity."
"This product has an easy-to-use interface with nice detail in the features."
"The most valuable feature is that you can run multiple automations at the same time, in parallel."
"I find WinAutomation's linear approach to the code and function calling valuable."
"The product could do more to expand its 'codeless' coding options by adding drag-and-drop assistance in building bots for non-technical users."
"The most common issue we have is with the OCR, but that also depends on the quality of the documents your scanning. Still, I would say the OCR is comparable to other solutions. I wouldn't say it's better or worse than other OCR engines."
"We have executed our robots thousands of times in our enterprise environment. However, in an enterprise environment, WorkFusion has performance problems. It is slow in production."
"There could be better version control through their web platform. That is something that could be improved on. Integration from the IDE, e.g., from WorkFusion Studio directly into Control Tower, would be nice to have too."
"There is enhanced functionality I would like to see, things that would further enhance the user experience, deliver greater efficiencies, and further mitigate risk."
"We are having some database issues, but we are addressing them."
"The solution is not user-friendly, this is something they should improve."
"We have had some problems in the past with the Inspector tool that looks at the elements on the screen. Replacing it or improving it is needed."
"SAP Contextor could improve by automating some processes."
"The stability of the product is not very good and can even fail with simple projects."
"WinAutomation is scalable to a certain extent. I would rate it seven for the scalability, which could be better. Softomotive is better scalable than WinAutomation in this regard."
"The OCR functionality needs to be improved."
"There is a limitation in setting up loops, where it does not support multiple conditions."
"It should work better for Angular websites, as it has a lot of problems."
SAP Contextor is ranked 27th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 1 review while WinAutomation by Softomotive is ranked 16th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 5 reviews. SAP Contextor is rated 7.0, while WinAutomation by Softomotive is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of SAP Contextor writes "Increases efficiency, good support, but automation needed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WinAutomation by Softomotive writes "You can build your RPA solutions with this easy-to-use product but the stability is questionable". SAP Contextor is most compared with UiPath, Automation Anywhere (AA), Blue Prism and IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA), whereas WinAutomation by Softomotive is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath, Automation Anywhere (AA), ProcessRobot by Softomotive and VisualCron.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.