Microsoft Power Automate vs SAP Intelligent RPA comparison

Microsoft and SAP are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.7, while SAP is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.0. Microsoft holds a 13.0% mindshare in RPA, compared to SAP’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Power Automate

Read 133 Microsoft Power Automate reviews

12,980 Views
12,071 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

SAP Intelligent RPA

Read 8 SAP Intelligent RPA reviews

1,430 Views
1,387 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Microsoft Power Automate

SAP Intelligent RPA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

SAP Intelligent RPA and Microsoft Power Automate offer robotic process automation solutions. SAP Intelligent RPA leads in customization, while Microsoft Power Automate stands out with its integration capabilities.

Features: SAP Intelligent RPA offers advanced automation for complex processes and a library of pre-built bots that simplify automation tasks. It also features flexible orchestration and job factory for seamless deployment. Microsoft Power Automate provides seamless integration with Microsoft's ecosystem and extensive connectors, supporting a wide range of applications. It also includes intuitive flow creation and the ability to automate office tasks.

Room for Improvement: SAP Intelligent RPA could enhance integration options beyond its current scope and simplify the initial setup process. It also needs better documentation to assist users. Microsoft Power Automate can improve in customization for complex automation scenarios, provide more robust automation features, and improve its user interface for more complex operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Power Automate offers a straightforward setup due to its deep integration with the Microsoft suite, providing ease in operation across platforms. Its extensive customer support options aid smooth deployment. SAP Intelligent RPA's deployment can be more intricate, but it offers strong support structures for users dealing with complex automation scenarios.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Intelligent RPA generally requires a higher initial investment, with potential for significant ROI through optimization of complex tasks. Microsoft Power Automate offers a competitive pricing structure, which is appealing for businesses seeking cost-effective, scalable solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Power Automate vs. SAP Intelligent RPA Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Power Automate vs. SAP Intelligent RPA

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,745 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Power Automate

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

3rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

133

Ranking in other categories

Process Mining (4th), Agentic Automation (3rd), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (4th)

SAP Intelligent RPA

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

17th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Power Automate is 13.0%, down from 20.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Intelligent RPA is 2.1%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Power Automate	13.0%
SAP Intelligent RPA	2.1%
Other	84.9%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

Ayobami Shobaloju

Customer Solution Provider at Wema Bank

Automating processes has saved time and improved communication

Something frustrates me concerning Microsoft Power Automate, and that is about the integration with Microsoft Forms and Excel. The issue now is that I don't get my responses synchronized automatically, and that frustrates me a lot. If the team could take this as feedback, the synchronization of the feedback responses from the forms and the Excel sheets should be seamless. This synchronization issue happens frequently, and it causes a lot of delays in the sense that the mails that ought to go out to the agents fail at some point. I have to reload these responses so that the agents can get their responses as when submitted. What I notice is that the responses don't go out without proper synchronization, so I reload the field responses, and this works afterwards. I would say probably a seamless walkthrough process for new users would be beneficial. For those using it for the first time, a seamless walkthrough process would be fine.

Read full review

SantoshSundar

RPA Technical Solution Lead at Infomentum

Helps automate processes but needs to offer different licensing models to users

Right now, I am not working on process mining at the minute. Before I switched to the company, I worked extremely closely with the process mining tool from UiPath, SAP BTP, and the process mining that they had created. I am working with MuleSoft Automation and Anypoint. We are not doing any sort of process mining at the minute, but in my company, because MuleSoft is one of the only RPA tools that we are looking at, we have another application called Appian that we are trying to explore now. Appian has process mining capability, which is why we thought we would look at it along with AI capabilities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a low-code platform. It is easy to use and good for automating small tasks such as expense approvals, timesheet approvals, etc."

"The interface is user-friendly."

"The solution is relatively easy to use and cost-effective."

"The best features of Microsoft Power Automate are its ability to switch from one app to another without user interaction, so you can automate a task, take data from one source, process it, and then output it in another format or have it as an input for another app, and also to transform data and have that done with minimal human interaction."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to integrate across multiple systems."

"It comes as a part of the Microsoft suite, which makes it an easy sell."

"The most valuable features of Microsoft Power Automate are the connectors, such as loops, which make things easier."

"The engineers on-site can generate an automated report that takes approximately 10 minutes, while before it took them two days."

More Microsoft Power Automate pros

"The initial setup of SAP Contextor is easy."

"Most of the details are already in the help portal and SAP notes are available. It is well documented as part of the product support."

"It is remarkably easy to configure and code, and it doesn't require an extensive technical background or coding expertise."

"The most valuable feature of SAP Contextor is that everyone is in one place in the program that I need."

"The standout features of SAP Intelligent RPA are its flexibility and integration capabilities."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"Scalability is fine. It is pretty nice."

"Contextor is a good solution for a Citrix environment. It's the first with this tool. Other tools provide the same functionality, but not with the Citrix environment."

Cons

"It would be great if it was able to integrate more with various other platforms. It would make development easier."

"Something frustrates me concerning Microsoft Power Automate, and that is about the integration with Microsoft Forms and Excel."

"The OCR functionality needs to be improved."

"It would be great if you could integrate outside of Microsoft environments."

"The integration of our system into Power Automate was a bit tricky. We had to put a data lake in place before automating anything because we were not very structured in terms of data. Our major issue was cleaning up the data."

"The solution could offer more specific training. There should be more examples of what the functions can do and more instructions and explanations to the process."

"Its licensing model should be improved. The pricing should be more visible and transparent. When you consume services, there are too many criteria to figure out how much it is going to cost you to use the product to its full extent. It should also support visual process editing, which is a standard feature for BPMN 2.0 compliance. They should improve the visual designer."

"Sometimes, Microsoft changes the game rules, and the free tools are no longer free, which makes it too hard to explain to customers. It is a SaaS service, so the cost is calculated based on the execution hours. However, we don't know the background of this cost because we cannot touch the infrastructure. They can be more open to developers or customers about this. The infrastructure part must be open for the customers."

More Microsoft Power Automate cons

"I found that the SAP scripting of a program is easier than SAP Contextor."

"The initial setup is of medium complexity. It is neither too hard nor too simple. You need some background in SAP and an understanding of it."

"For potential features or improvements, one aspect I would suggest enhancing is the flexibility of the extraction process."

"I would like to see a better capacity for unstructured data, for example, PDF, or text within images."

"One way SAP Intelligent RPA could improve is by integrating built-in DI services for document processing."

"The tool's licensing has been kind of a challenge...At the moment, the tool does not offer different licensing models to users."

"SAP Contextor could improve by automating some processes."

"There should be more of an error, like a proper error feature, in future releases. Sometimes, we don't understand why that automation is not learning what, like, where it is stuck, or what is the reason like, or what is the criteria we are missing to add. So a proper error message would be helpful."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Good price-quality relationship. Its features for its price were the best fit for our company."

"Microsoft Power Automate is part of our Office 365 package, there are no additional licensing costs."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing two to three out of ten."

"I give the cost a three out of ten."

"There should be increased transparency about which features attend the pricing."

"At the moment, from our experience with the two, Power Automate is a lot more expensive solution than Automation Anywhere, but it is also a far more reliable solution. With the price increases and with the current pandemic situation going on worldwide, a lot of the prices have fluctuated, but the packages and the all-encompassing features you get with the Microsoft package far outweigh the benefits from the Automation Anywhere side. Each package on the Automation Anywhere side is cheaper, but we need to continuously purchase subsequent packages to continue with our automation to the extent that we require. So, the Power Automate solution is a bit more pricey, but it does offer us a far better range of capabilities."

"The solution is $150 per month for the unattended add-on, and the normal Power Automate comes with an E3 license."

"My company switched to a monthly payment for the WinAutomation by Softomotive license. I don't have the exact figure, but it roughly amounts to 500 Euros a year which isn't bad."

More Microsoft Power Automate pricing and cost advice

"It all comes with a bundle right now. Having advanced features, it is competitively priced."

"This is not a tool or software with a license as others are. The SaaS model is based on the usage of the tool."

"The pricing is not that expensive. It is manageable."

"The initial cost might seem higher, but over time, with continued use over five or ten years, the cost tends to decrease, making it a more economical choice."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	50
Midsize Enterprise	17
Large Enterprise	66

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

RPA that Bots can run without centralized control?

Yes, Attended Bots which can run without centralized control Module. RPA Tools like Automation Anywhere, uiPath ,Power Automation they do support this.

See all answers

How do I choose between UiPath and Microsoft Power Automate?

Microsoft‌ ‌Power‌ ‌Automate‌ ‌is‌ ‌intuitive‌ ‌and‌ ‌easy‌ ‌to‌ ‌integrate‌ ‌and‌ ‌use.‌ ‌I‌ ‌like‌ ‌that‌ ‌there‌ ‌is‌ ‌no‌ ‌coding‌ ‌experience‌ ‌necessary,‌ ‌and‌ ‌appreciate‌ ‌the‌ ‌automated‌...

See all answers

How is Automation Anywhere compared to Microsoft Power Automate?

‌Neither‌ ‌solution‌ ‌requires‌ ‌any‌ ‌coding‌ ‌experience,‌ ‌and‌ ‌both‌ ‌are‌ ‌easy‌ ‌to‌ ‌use‌ ‌and‌ ‌have‌ ‌great‌ ‌drag-and‌ ‌drop‌ ‌functionality.‌ ‌The‌ ‌training‌ ‌and‌ ‌resources‌ ‌for‌ ‌A...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Contextor?

The tool's licensing has been kind of a challenge. If the tool can bring up a usage-based licensing model, it would be really good. Even a flat rate kind of licensing model would be good, where, fo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP Contextor?

The inputs of SAP Intelligent RPA used to come from the process mining output. Whenever we connect process mining to the SAP instances, their SAP instances give us what processes, where the bottlen...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SAP Contextor?

Speaking about bot creation and management features, I rate the tool as four out of five compared to the other market leaders. UiPath is much better, but SAP is not very far behind. For SAP Intelli...

See all answers

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs Microsoft Power Automate

Compared 16% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Microsoft Power Automate

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vs Microsoft Power Automate

Compared 12% of the time

Blue Prism vs Microsoft Power Automate

Compared 12% of the time

Pega Robotic Process Automation vs Microsoft Power Automate

Compared 8% of the time

More Microsoft Power Automate Competitors

UiPath Platform vs SAP Intelligent RPA

Compared 24% of the time

SAP Build Process Automation vs SAP Intelligent RPA

Compared 16% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs SAP Intelligent RPA

Compared 11% of the time

Redwood Software - Finance Automation Edition vs SAP Intelligent RPA

Compared 6% of the time

Jacada Intelligent Agent Engagement vs SAP Intelligent RPA

Compared 6% of the time

More SAP Intelligent RPA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Power Automate

January 2026

Download Microsoft Power Automate product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Intelligent RPA

December 2025

Download SAP Intelligent RPA product report

Also Known As

Power Automate, Microsoft Flow, MS Power Automate, WinAutomation by Softomotive, ProcessRobot by Softomotive, Minit

SAP Contextor, Contextor

Overview

Microsoft Power Automate is a powerful tool that streamlines and automates tasks within an organization.

It is used for workflow automation, data integration, and creating automated notifications and approvals.

Power Automate connects different applications and services, such as SharePoint, Excel, and Outlook, to automate data transfer and synchronization.

Microsoft

SAP Intelligent Robotic Process Automation lets you automate enterprise business processes. Design process automations within the Cloud Studio by creating end-to-end workflows. Generate packages from these automations into the Cloud Factory powered by SAP BTP to configure and execute these packages with Agents. Agents running on workstations can work as a digital assistant (attended automation) or as a digital worker (unattended automation).

SAP Intelligent RPA enables business users and technologists to become citizen developers. With powerful yet intuitive low-code and no-code capabilities, the solution supports you in driving automation by tapping into the expertise of citizen developers.

SAP

Sample Customers

1. Coca-Cola 2. General Electric 3. Siemens 4. Accenture 5. Deloitte 6. Johnson & Johnson 7. Ford 8. Nestle 9. Procter & Gamble 10. IBM 11. Amazon 12. Google 13. Microsoft 14. Adobe 15. Cisco 16. Oracle 17. SAP 18. Intel 19. HP 20. Dell 21. Verizon 22. AT&T 23. T-Mobile 24. Walmart 25. Target 26. Home Depot 27. McDonald's 28. Starbucks 29. Nike 30. Apple 31. Facebook 32. Twitter

BNP Paribas, Societe Generale, Kabel Deutschland, Orange, Carrefour

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Power Automate vs. SAP Intelligent RPA

December 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Power Automate vs. SAP Intelligent RPA

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Power Automate vs. SAP Intelligent RPA and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Power Automate vs. SAP Intelligent RPA report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.