Samanage vs Sendbird comparison

SolarWinds and Sendbird are both solutions in the Help Desk Software category. SolarWinds is ranked #26, while Sendbird is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.1. SolarWinds holds a 1.7% mindshare in HDS, compared to Sendbird’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SolarWinds users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Sendbird users who would recommend it.

Samanage

Read 3 Samanage reviews

2,169 Views
1,388 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Sendbird

Read 7 Sendbird reviews

1,950 Views
761 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Samanage

Sendbird

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Samanage and Sendbird operate in distinct categories, with Samanage focusing on IT service management and Sendbird on in-app messaging. Samanage surpasses in configuration and integration, enhancing IT capabilities, while Sendbird's effective communication tools drive user engagement.

Features: Samanage provides IT service management with features like workflow automation, asset management, and detailed reporting to streamline operations. Sendbird enhances user engagement through in-app messaging, real-time chat, and message analytics. Each product's features cater to different organizational needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Samanage offers straightforward deployment with a secure cloud infrastructure for easy IT setup integration, complemented by comprehensive support. Sendbird provides seamless API integration within applications, supported by extensive developer tools and resources, highlighting its application integration strength.

Pricing and ROI: Samanage delivers competitive pricing with visible IT cost reductions through service management efficiencies, offering promising ROI by reducing administrative work. Sendbird, potentially more costly, offers high value in enhancing user engagement and retention through communication-centric features, justifying its investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Samanage vs. Sendbird Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Samanage vs. Sendbird

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Samanage

Ranking in Help Desk Software

26th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Asset Management (19th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (27th), License Management (10th)

Sendbird

Ranking in Help Desk Software

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Social Software (6th), AI Customer Experience Personalization (3rd), AI Customer Support (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Help Desk Software category, the mindshare of Samanage is 1.7%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sendbird is 0.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Help Desk Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Sendbird	0.9%
Samanage	1.7%
Other	97.4%

Help Desk Software

Featured Reviews

Meechai C.

Consult at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Detects incidents quickly, improves our SLA performance and solves issues faster

We mainly use it for incident logging. We'd like to add service request functionality, but we don't have the knowledge to configure the requests and the workflows properly. We'd like to integrate our workflows with the incident management, so we use it to manage our work better. We'd like to implement the service request feature. Right now, we just record everything as incidents. Some activities can take a long time, maybe one or two weeks. This makes it hard to maintain a good SLA, even if we work hard. So, response speed and workflow improvements.

Read full review

Pranay Koley

Junior Software Developer at Weavers Web Solutions Private Limited

Facilitates user communication with rich features

In our company, we are using Sendbird for building a chat feature within our salon application. I am using the Flutter framework to implement the chat feature, which facilitates communication between users and businesses, specifically salon shops There are many useful features with Sendbird. I…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Samanage has not only taken over asset and inventory management, but it also has the ability to function across departments, making it easy for end users to submit help desk tickets for IT, HR, and Finance."

"I would recommend Samanage from the IT support perspective because it's a great ticketing system and the only downside is the site shutdowns and the messy nature of the UI and UX."

"The solution has a great filtering feature."

"The best part is the ability to keep records, especially incident records. It's easy to use the tool to store data and monitor it."

"Features similar to WhatsApp, such as online and offline statuses, message reactions, and replies, add significant value."

"The backend system was managed by Sendbird, eliminating the need for caching systems or local storage on user devices."

"The most valuable feature for us, besides chat, was file transfer, as we used it for sending files and images in chats."

"There are many useful features with Sendbird."

"Sendbird is very flexible, and they have made great strides towards optimization."

"The Sendbird developer portal provides each step, including methods, making it easy to implement."

"Sendbird provides many features for real-time messaging, such as receipt ID and typing indicators."

"Sendbird is reliable and generally crash-free."

Cons

"The system shuts down about once a month which is frustrating."

"The setting up process is not quite easy. It's quite difficult."

"We've had some problems with the system shutting down about once a month. It sometimes takes five or 10 minutes to start working again but it can also take hours."

"There are definitely areas for improvement, but so far, so good."

"The documentation for integrating with the Flutter framework is lacking detailed information."

"A major issue was the requirement for a separate connection to Sendbird, resulting in a delay when initiating the chat."

"I thought that there should be the audio and the video call functionality as well."

"Their pricing is very high compared to competitors, which is a concern for us."

"The documentation for integrating with the Flutter framework is lacking detailed information. Initially, I struggled to connect users and manage tokens for active and offline sessions, which caused frustration."

"At times, there are unexpected behaviors where the documentation suggests something different from how the SDK actually behaves, requiring us to create workarounds."

"Impersonating a user or using a template user to send messages for development purposes would be very useful."

"More analytics tools could be integrated into Sendbird."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive."

"There is a starter plan for $399 per month, and a pro plan for $799 dollars."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Help Desk Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

23%

Healthcare Company

10%

Media Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sendbird?

Testing Sendbird is challenging due to the trial limitations of only one hundred users. The subscription cost is quite high, which prevents us from subscribing before the project completion and use...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sendbird?

The documentation for integrating with the Flutter framework is lacking detailed information. Initially, I struggled to connect users and manage tokens for active and offline sessions, which caused...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sendbird?

See all answers

Comparisons

ServiceNow vs Samanage

Compared 13% of the time

Freshservice vs Samanage

Compared 12% of the time

Provance IT Asset Management Pack vs Samanage

Compared 4% of the time

LiveAgent vs Samanage

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Asset Management Suite vs Samanage

Compared 3% of the time

More Samanage Competitors

Atera vs Sendbird

Compared 22% of the time

Jamf School vs Sendbird

Compared 16% of the time

Vinculum Solutions VIN PIM Product Information Management vs Sendbird

Compared 11% of the time

Jamf Connect vs Sendbird

Compared 9% of the time

Zendesk vs Sendbird

Compared 9% of the time

More Sendbird Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Help Desk Software

April 2026

Download Samanage product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Social Software

April 2026

Download Sendbird product report

Also Known As

No data available

Sendbird Calls, Sendbird Desk

Overview

Samanage is a cloud-based IT service management platform designed to streamline support operations and improve efficiency. It provides a user-friendly experience tailored for various industries.

Focused on enhancing IT operations, Samanage offers a range of tools that facilitate seamless service delivery and management. Its cloud-native architecture ensures scalability and reliability, while its intuitive design allows users to effectively handle incidents, changes, and assets without extensive training. This adaptability makes it a trusted choice for organizations looking to enhance their IT service management capabilities.

What are the key features of Samanage?

Incident Management: Quickly address and resolve support requests with streamlined processing.
Change Management: Manage changes with comprehensive tracking and implementation protocols.
Asset Management: Optimize the management of IT assets with real-time tracking and lifecycle insights.
Service Catalog: Provide a self-service portal with customizable service offerings.
Knowledge Base: Empower teams with accessible documentation and solutions for common issues.

What benefits can users expect from Samanage?

Improved Efficiency: Automate repetitive tasks to save time and reduce errors.
Cost Reduction: Optimize resource allocation and minimize downtime associated with IT issues.
Enhanced Scalability: Easily scale operations without disruptions, accommodating growth seamlessly.
User Satisfaction: Provide faster and more accurate support, leading to higher satisfaction scores.
Data-Driven Insights: Access actionable analytics to drive informed decision-making.

In industries like healthcare and education, Samanage is implemented to support critical IT infrastructure, ensuring reliable service delivery and compliance with industry-specific regulations. By integrating with existing systems, it enhances efficiency while maintaining a focus on security and user privacy.

SolarWinds

Sendbird offers scalable, API-driven chat features tailored for real-time messaging, supporting ease of integration and robust developer tools.

Sendbird is known for its scalability in managing extensive chat groups and API-based operations, complemented by an effective developer portal. It offers real-time messaging with features like file transfer, receipt IDs, typing indicators, and message reactions, all enhancing communication. The platform optimizes reliability through metadata and online/offline messaging capabilities. However, users experience challenges with SDK connection delays, URL thumbnail generation, and message display, particularly during version transitions. Concerns about pricing, support, and documentation quality, as well as the absence of audio/video calls and analytics tools, are mentioned.

What are Sendbird's most noteworthy features?

API-Based Approach: Offers seamless integration for various app functionalities.
Real-Time Messaging: Facilitates file transfer, typing indicators, and message reactions.
Scalability: Supports large chat groups with robust management capabilities.
Developer Portal: Provides comprehensive tools for customization and optimization.

What should users expect in terms of benefits and ROI?

Efficiency in Communication: Chat room management enhances user interaction.
Reliability: Provides optimized messaging capabilities even with high user loads.
Scalability: Grows with business needs, handling expansive communication requirements.
Versatile Applications: Supports sector-specific implementations like healthcare and travel.

Sendbird is implemented across industries for chat functionality. In travel, it connects users with flight attendants; in business, it facilitates customer interactions. Healthcare utilizes it for patient-doctor consultations. Social media and real-time applications employ it for chats and video calls, optimizing communication in mobile apps and enhancing user and business interactions in salon applications.

Sendbird

Sample Customers

SXSW, PRA Group, Fandango, Inteva Products, Amherst College, Tensator

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Samanage vs. Sendbird

April 2026

Free Report: Samanage vs. Sendbird

Find out what your peers are saying about Samanage vs. Sendbird and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Samanage vs. Sendbird report.

See our list of best Help Desk Software vendors.

We monitor all Help Desk Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.