Qlik Compose vs Zapier comparison

Read 49 Zapier reviews

5,622 Views
2,530 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Zapier and Qlik Compose both compete in the automation and data integration category. Zapier seems to have the upper hand in automation and ease of use, while Qlik Compose shines in data modeling and ETL capabilities.

Features: Zapier offers vast integration potential with many apps, a user-friendly point-and-click system, and requires minimal customization. Qlik Compose provides strong ETL capabilities, robust data integration, and focuses heavily on data modeling and warehousing.

Room for Improvement: Zapier users desire an expanded Zap library, enhanced workflow complexity, and improved error reporting. Qlik Compose could enhance its ETL functionalities, provide better scalability, and improve monitoring in high-volume settings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zapier is noted for its easy setup in the public cloud and satisfactory technical support, though some feel response times could improve. Qlik Compose is available on-premises and private cloud, with mixed support experiences, where some users seek improved technical assistance and documentation.

Pricing and ROI: Zapier is competitively priced for startups but can become costly with high usage, though ROI is justified by time savings. Qlik Compose is seen as having a high cost, with calls for more transparent pricing. Users note significant ROI from effective data management.

To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Compose vs. Zapier Report (Updated: June 2026).

Qlik Compose vs. Zapier

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Compose

Ranking in Data Integration

51st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zapier

Ranking in Data Integration

23rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (14th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (19th), AI Software Development (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Compose is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zapier is 1.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Zapier	1.0%
Qlik Compose	0.8%
Other	98.2%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Susheel A

Director - Metrics & Analytics at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Efficient data warehouse automation with robust features, but may require enhancements in user-friendly self-service options and pricing flexibility for broader corporate appeal

It could enhance its capabilities in the realm of self-service options as currently, it is more suited for individuals with technical proficiency who can create pages using it. When it comes to end users who may lack technical expertise, they are limited to toggling between existing developments. To empower end users to make critical changes without relying heavily on technical expertise, it would be beneficial to introduce more user-friendly features for development and modification. If it could incorporate correlation analysis capabilities into its platform, especially in a user-friendly manner, it would greatly enhance the tool's overall utility and make it an even more outstanding solution. There is a room for improvement regarding stability.

Read full review

MuhammadImran

Go High Level Manager at Virtual Worker Now

Automation expertise grows and enhances global collaboration

The most valuable aspect is the ability to integrate with over 20,000 applications, which is a superior feature compared to Make.com that has limited applications access. I use multi-step automation workflows in my tasks, which increases productivity and efficiency. The features such as if-else conditions allow for different branches in automation, making the automation more productive. I utilized conditional logic, text parsing, and formatting. My experience with these advanced features has been excellent. For instance, I once pushed data from Zapier to GoHighLevel while checking the date, and based on that date, I created automation in GoHighLevel that involved various branches, effectively creating a loop. Remote access to Zapier's automated workflows and cloud integration is beneficial. I use cloud services such as Google Drive and Dropbox within Zapier. The remote capabilities are advantageous, allowing us to provide services from Pakistan for businesses based in the USA, reducing company expenses when hiring employees from the USA. The ability to work remotely globally through Zapier is a significant opportunity.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The technical support is very good. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good."

"One of the most valuable features of this tool is its automation capabilities, allowing us to design the warehouse in an automated manner. Additionally, we can generate Data Lifecycle Policies (DLP) reports and efficiently implement updates and best practices based on proven design patterns."

"There were many valuable features, such as extracting any data to put in the cloud. For example, Qlik was able to gather data from SAP and extract SAP data from the platforms."

"It can scale."

"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive."

"One of the most valuable features was the ability to integrate multiple source systems that mainly used structured IDBMS versions."

"I have found it to be a very good, stable, and strong product."

More Qlik Compose pros

"What's most valuable in Zapier is its simplicity, seamlessness, and smooth plug-in, so you won't need to build code for every action. I'm not a developer, but I can use Zapier."

"The main thing I appreciate about Zapier is that it has maximum availability of apps, with most tools being available compared to different solutions."

"Zapier, combined with MailParser, is an essential element of our back-end operations."

"The ability to connect web applications to trigger actions in another app after having enriched, formatted, delayed, grouped, and filtered is really valuable for many businesses."

"I recommend Zapier because there is demand and it is easy to use."

"Zapier handles everything under the sun that you would think you need in automation. It is the most mature integration platform and service on the market."

"I utilized Zapier's feature of connecting over 2000 apps for various automations in my business processes."

"There are many uses for operations, marketing, and sales."

More Zapier pros

Cons

"When processing data from certain tables with a large volume of data, we encounter significant delays. For instance, when dealing with around one million records, it typically takes three to four hours. To address this, I aim to implement performance improvements across all tables, ensuring swift processing similar to those that are currently complete within seconds. The performance issue primarily arises when we analyze the inserts and updates from the source, subsequently dropping the table. While new insertions are handled promptly, updates are processed slowly, leading to performance issues. Despite consulting our Qlik vendors, they were unable to pinpoint the exact cause of this occurrence. Consequently, I am seeking ways to optimize performance within Qlik Compose, specifically concerning updates."

"My issues with the solution's stability are owing to the fact that it has certain bugs causing issues in some functionalities that should be working."

"It would be better if the first level of technical support were a bit more technically knowledgeable to solve the problem. I think they could also improve the injection of custom scripts. It is pretty difficult to add additional scripts. If the modeling doesn't give you what you want, and you want to change the script generated by the modeling, it is a bit more challenging than in most other products. It is very good with standard form type systems, but if you get a more complicated data paradigm, it tends to struggle with transforming that into a model."

"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails."

"There should be proper documentation available for the implementation process."

"There is some scope for improvement around the documentation, and a better UI would definitely help."

"Qlik's ETL and data transformation could be better."

"I don't think Qlik can be used in a high-volume scenario. It didn't work for us."

More Qlik Compose cons

"I would like to see them improve the Quickbase integration. Currently, it only allows triggering actions when records are added, but it would be more useful if we could also trigger actions when records are modified or deleted."

"The technical support is low."

"It could support various languages along with Python."

"Some recent changes to the solution have made it bulky and not as intuitive to use as it previously was."

"At the moment, they allow a limited number of apps. I look forward to getting more apps for each package."

"With Zapier, improvements are required in the areas of concerns like bugs, ease of use, and documentation."

"Zapier could be a little faster, but that might not be possible. I would encourage Zapier to make more API endpoints for each application"

"In our case, very limited actions and limited objects are supported."

More Zapier cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"Think your Zaps through to make sure you don't use more Zaps than you need."

"It's very affordable."

"Zapier is a paid service. Its license renews monthly, and Zapier will downgrade your subscription to the free version when your credit card doesn't have funds. That significantly impacts your service because everything halts completely. Zapier doesn't have any hidden costs."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"Zapier's price is good."

"The price of Zapier is approximately $75 monthly."

"Per task, there is a monthly plan involving 15 euros...Also, in different forms, they just give you the ability to use different features. They charge 18.58 euros for the first standard plan, which includes 750 tasks. So, it is about 25 cents per task."

"There is a free plan that is, of course, limited. However, it allows you to understand and check true scenarios for a while."

More Zapier pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zapier?

The pricing is in accordance with market standards and even lower in some cases. The license setup cost is reasonable.

What needs improvement with Zapier?

Zapier can be improved by having more complex running scenarios, such as running code and more custom modules, and maybe multi-router cases which will make the workflows even tighter and more compl...

What is your primary use case for Zapier?

My main use case for Zapier is that it acts as a no-code automation platform which helps us in automating business platforms and business process automation. It is a tool that we were using prior t...

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose

Comparisons

Compared 10% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Qlik Compose

Compared 8% of the time

WhereScape RED vs Qlik Compose

Compared 7% of the time

SSIS vs Qlik Compose

Compared 7% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Compose

Compared 6% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

Tray.io vs Zapier

Compared 6% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs Zapier

Compared 6% of the time

MuleSoft Composer vs Zapier

Compared 4% of the time

SSIS vs Zapier

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs Zapier

Compared 4% of the time

More Zapier Competitors

Product Reports

Qlik Compose

Download Qlik Compose product report

Download Zapier product report

Also Known As

Compose, Attunity Compose

No data available

Overview

Qlik Compose enhances data management with ETL capabilities, data integration with CDC, and real-time replication. Its intuitive interface enables easy data modeling and automation, supporting various database integrations.

Qlik Compose is designed for efficient data preparation, migration, and warehouse generation. It incorporates ETL functionalities and data integration with CDC, allowing users to effortlessly create data marts without code. Its automation features facilitate warehouse design while graphical representations and connectivity options increase versatility across multiple sources. Users value its stability, scalability, and the support provided, although improvements in ETL functionalities, performance for large datasets, and NoSQL integration are needed. The solution is widely used in business intelligence with tools like Qlik Replicate for real-time data replication and requires direct SQL for complex transformations.

What are the key features of Qlik Compose?

ETL Capabilities: Simplifies data extraction, transformation, and loading
Data Integration with CDC: Enables real-time data replication
Intuitive Interface: Facilitates easy data modeling and automation
Drag-and-Drop Functionality: Streamlines data task management
Auto-Mapping: Enhances integration of multiple data sources
No-Code Data Marts Creation: Reduces dependency on technical skills

What benefits should users consider in the reviews?

Stability and Scalability: Reliable functioning for growing data needs
Technical Support: Availability of assistance for troubleshooting
Real-Time Replication Capabilities: Efficient data processing and analytics
Low-Code Development: Simplifies complex data handling processes

In industries, Qlik Compose is implemented for enhancing data preparation, migration, and warehousing. It is used in small projects or straightforward data integration tasks and supports business intelligence efforts by offering low-code capabilities, enabling companies to deliver tailored analytics solutions efficiently.

Qlik

Zapier connects thousands of apps, enabling seamless automation without coding. It supports webhooks, multi-step tasks, and a wide array of integrations. Despite needing enhancements in Google Sheets capabilities, API limits, and UI, it remains a tool for boosting productivity across many sectors.

By linking tools such as Google Sheets, HubSpot, Slack, and Salesforce, Zapier allows users to automate workflows without coding expertise. Its integrations serve logistics operations, CRM, and social media management. Users can process tracking exceptions and streamline operations with third-party software like QuickBooks, Zoho, and Power BI. Although users suggest features like better Google Sheets handling and improved collaboration tools, Zapier continues to provide expansive automation, enhancing efficiency and facilitating new opportunities through integrations.

What Features Stand Out in Zapier?

App Connectivity: Integrates thousands of tools, simplifying task automation.
Ease of Use: No coding needed to set up integrations.
Webhooks: Offers real-time data transfer between applications.
Multi-step Zaps: Allows complex workflows across various apps.
Comprehensive Library: Extensive list of app integrations for users.

What Benefits Should You Expect?

Increased Productivity: Facilitates seamless automation of tasks.
Efficiency Improvement: Streamlines processes across multiple tools.
Business Agility: Supports varied workflows to meet specific needs.
Integration Flexibility: Connects a wide range of popular applications.
Simple Automation: Users automate processes without technical skills.

In logistics, Zapier enhances operations by automating exception tracking and third-party software integration. Its use in CRM and social media streamlines lead creation and workflow automation. Users from diverse industries leverage its extensive connectivity to support intelligence management, generate analytical insights, and execute cross-functional tasks efficiently.

Sample Customers

Poly-Wood

BuzzFeed, Groupon, Spotify, Columbia University, FOX

Qlik Compose vs. Zapier