We performed a comparison between Proofpoint Email Protection and Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Secure Email Gateway (SEG) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the option to edit the inbound security."
"I like all the features with Proofpoint, such as how it filters the spam and marketing mail, lost reality mail, blocks phishing attacks, blocks malicious attachments, and stops phishing links. Also it can defend against the business email compromise impersonation technique. It is a complete solution for all email attacks. It filters for the bad, malicious attachments. If there is any executable file, it can be deleted. It is a good, complete solution."
"It's a mature product. It does a good job in detection."
"The solution scales quite well."
"A one-stop shop for email protection"
"Its anti-phishing functionality is the most valuable. Certainly, the biggest problem I have is phishing."
"They have customized security rules, mature rules, anti-virus protection, as well as email authentication similar to SPF, DKIM, and DMARC."
"As a cloud-based product, it can scale well."
"The technical support services are excellent."
"The solution provides protection with its Email Track Records and Machine Manual features."
"Proofpoint Email Protection could improve on the training. Every organization is different and to fine-tune it to block everything properly there needs to be better training. Sometimes it can block some of the information it shouldn't."
"It's scalable, but the devil's in the details — you have to know your email volumes."
"The price could be improved."
"The solution could be improved with the addition of PLP and email encryption features."
"It has too many screens. It is kind of a conglomeration of products. In other words, they built product A, product B, and product C, and they are yet to integrate them into a single administrative console. I would certainly like to see a more seamless administrative interface. I would also like to see them include more bang for the buck, by including features like email fraud protection, rather than making their product so piecemeal, where you are buying little pieces. I agree with the idea of having multiple tiers or layers, but maybe as small, medium, and large, as opposed to an a la carte menu."
"The flexibility of the solution can be improved."
"The scalability can be improved, and the solution can be optimized."
"Proofpoint Email Protection could improve by reducing the price."
"The solution's pricing could be improved."
"The product's pricing could be more flexible."
More Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Proofpoint Email Protection is ranked 1st in Secure Email Gateway (SEG) with 44 reviews while Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security is ranked 15th in Secure Email Gateway (SEG) with 2 reviews. Proofpoint Email Protection is rated 8.4, while Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Proofpoint Email Protection writes "A reasonably priced product that offers protection to emails, along with spam filters". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security writes "Has good technical support services but could have flexible pricing ". Proofpoint Email Protection is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP), Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Cisco Secure Email and Fortinet FortiMail, whereas Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security is most compared with Trend Micro Email Security and Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP). See our Proofpoint Email Protection vs. Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security report.
See our list of best Secure Email Gateway (SEG) vendors.
We monitor all Secure Email Gateway (SEG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.