We performed a comparison between Trend Micro Email Security and Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Email Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup is straightforward. You just add the license, click it, and then you can set up the rules. It is quite simple."
"It also gives the vulnerability status according to the versions you have selected. Let's say you have Google Chrome. It mentions the versions it has, and it updates. Within two hours of an update, it is reflected in the dashboard. That's really nice to have."
"Does a thorough job of examining email and URLs for malicious content."
"Microsoft Defender for Office 365's most valuable feature is its performance."
"Defender helps us prioritize threats across our organization."
"Microsoft Defender for Office 365's most valuable features are safe attachments and safe links."
"Threat Explorer is one of the features that I very much like because it is a real-time report that allows you to identify, analyze, and trace security attacks."
"The benefit that stands out to me is the ability for multiple individuals to collaborate simultaneously within the same document. Additionally, there is the option to save the document directly in the integrated OneDrive or SharePoint."
"The email and the signature based protection is the most valuable feature."
"Trend Micro Email Security scans all email attachments because, nowadays, ransomware or malware files are sent through email attachments."
"The most valuable feature of Trend Micro Email Security is effective phishing prevention."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the antivirus, antispam, and integration with cloud services. This is a multifunctional solution."
"Trend Micro has inter-domain security features that solutions from other vendors like Forcepoint lack."
"The technical support is good."
"Trend Micro Email Security is a robust solution with quick performance. It works autonomously without the need for an administrator."
"The most valuable features include email filtering to block spam and phishing attempts, the use of DMARC for email authentication, and robust malware scanning."
"The solution provides protection with its Email Track Records and Machine Manual features."
"The technical support services are excellent."
"The custom alerts have to improve a lot."
"Microsoft Defender for Office 365 could improve by giving customers information on techniques to prevent threats. For example, information about best practices on how to protect their own devices against hackers and scammers, such as educational information or training. This would help others have a better understanding of cyber security. Additionally, there can be more security features added."
"The XDR dashboard has room for improvement."
"It would be better if it were more scalable. It depends on the architecture, but we would like to make it more scalable for both data centers."
"Microsoft wants its well-paying customers to finish testing some of its half-baked products, find bugs, and report bugs back to Microsoft's team, which is a little frustrating for those who have to manage it and roll it up to thousands of people across the organization."
"The only thing they should improve is the licensing model. They should stop changing it. A year ago, the five features I mentioned were included in one product. Now, three of them are bundled into one product, and you have to pay extra for the other two. I don't mind paying extra, but I don't want them to change it every year or every six months. I need to know what I'm looking at and not worry about it next year."
"The pre-sales cost calculations could be more transparent."
"Microsoft Defender for Office 365 must improve the overall management style, including the GUI. It also needs to change the filters so that it is easy to whitelist and blacklist data."
"There needs to be more documentation for the product."
"The only negative thing about Trend Micro Email Security is its price. It could be less expensive."
"There is room for improvement in threat detection, especially for advanced attacks and business email compromise."
"They need to adjust the spam filtering and make it stronger."
"Trend Micro Email Security should introduce new features, improvements, and updates which are cost-effective and easy to deploy."
"It is a bit expensive than the market price."
"There is a lot of room for improvement towards the phishing kind of email filtering, with the different hijacking attacks, and with the kind of password attacks which these phisher attackers do."
"Sometimes malicious email gets past the email gateway."
"The product's pricing could be more flexible."
"The solution's pricing could be improved."
More Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Trend Micro Email Security is ranked 8th in Email Security with 21 reviews while Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security is ranked 30th in Email Security with 2 reviews. Trend Micro Email Security is rated 8.0, while Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Trend Micro Email Security writes "The solution blocks spam emails from reaching the user’s mailbox but should introduce new features, improvements, and updates". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security writes "Has good technical support services but could have flexible pricing ". Trend Micro Email Security is most compared with Cisco Secure Email, Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP), Fortinet FortiMail, Barracuda Email Security Gateway and Proofpoint Email Protection, whereas Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security is most compared with Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP). See our Trend Micro Email Security vs. Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security report.
See our list of best Email Security vendors.
We monitor all Email Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.