Planview Daptiv vs Smartsheet comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Planview and Smartsheet are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Planview is ranked #10 with an average rating of 10.0, while Smartsheet is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. Planview holds a 3.2% mindshare in PPM, compared to Smartsheet’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Planview users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Smartsheet users who would recommend it.

Planview Daptiv

Read 12 Planview Daptiv reviews

3,322 Views
1,528 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Smartsheet

Read 43 Smartsheet reviews

6,214 Views
2,299 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Planview Daptiv

Smartsheet

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Planview Daptiv and Smartsheet are competing in the project management category. Smartsheet appears to have the upper hand due to its ease of use and intuitive design.

Features: Planview Daptiv offers comprehensive project management features such as portfolio management, resource planning, and excellent reporting capabilities. Smartsheet provides versatile project tracking, integration with tools like Jira and Microsoft Teams, and low-code capabilities for workflow automation.

Room for Improvement: Planview Daptiv could improve by simplifying its interface and enhancing integration capabilities. Smartsheet could benefit from expanding its feature set, offering more extensive customization options, and improving its advanced analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Planview Daptiv requires a more intricate setup process, but provides tailored support for complex enterprise needs. Smartsheet is straightforward to deploy and offers robust customer support with a focus on accessibility and simplicity, making it ideal for faster implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Planview Daptiv involves higher upfront costs but promises significant ROI for enterprises needing detailed management capabilities. Smartsheet offers a more budget-friendly setup with recognizable ROI, appealing to organizations aiming for flexible, cost-effective solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Planview Daptiv vs. Smartsheet Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv vs. Smartsheet

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Planview Daptiv

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Smartsheet

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of Planview Daptiv is 3.2%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Smartsheet is 4.2%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Smartsheet	4.2%
Planview Daptiv	3.2%
Other	92.6%

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2068344

Director of Operations at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Useful project management capabilities, beneficial dashboards, but project planning could improve

The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance. In a future release, it would be beneficial to have a undo button.

Read full review

DonatasSinkevicius

Project Manager at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees

Automation simplifies manual tasks and facilitates team communication

There are many useful features in Smartsheet. One can easily share plans with the entire team, and it functions similarly to Microsoft Project. Creating dependencies across all tasks is smooth, and team members can make adjustments if necessary. Automation helps by simplifying some manual work, saving time and facilitating communication.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The timekeeping features are great and very helpful."

"The experience with Changepoint has been great considering that most organizations won't use 90% of the application's features."

"Consequently, it is the single point of truth for both our project managers and our senior leadership."

"Daptiv templates give you a world of possibilities, no matter the PMI maturity level the company has."

"The powerful collaboration is definitely the most valuable and the fact that you can adjust flexibility to almost any methodology, and the easy creation of complete new functionalities without programming code."

"I implemented for a large client of mine and saw them quickly get up and running and leverage Daptiv to help them manage their IT demand from their internal customers."

"Reporting of IT capacity available for first time, time sheets available for first time."

"Changepoint allowed us to model resource request/assignment workflow in our large PS organization."

More Planview Daptiv pros

"I like the dashboarding feature best, as it lets me assemble a workspace with source sheets, dashboards, and reports simultaneously. The standard reports and worksheets are most useful for team collaboration. People look at dashboards during presentations, but they go to the sheets to update projects, add comments, or make notifications. It's automated, so changes come to me or whoever needs to see them. I can send notifications from specific line items."

"The dashboard and the layouts are quite good."

"The most valuable features of Smartsheet are its collaboration tools, the ability to centralize and prioritize projects, and robust reporting capabilities."

"I was using Microsoft Project and Excel to do the same job previously, I wanted an easy solution, and I found Smartsheet, I tried it, and it seemed to do the trick."

"What I found most valuable in Smartsheet is its project customization feature. It's a great solution because you can add in your own WBS. You can see it in Jira style, Kanban, and you can even do Agile and Waterfall. Another feature that's valuable in the solution is when you have those connections, you have that API, you have a sandbox, and you can make a solution, it's a tremendous product because you can pull data."

"The solution has subtasks and a rollup."

"Smartsheet is stable."

"To me, one of the most powerful features of Smartsheet is being able to email others."

More Smartsheet pros

Cons

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current. Some aren't useful at all. There's an overall lack of coherence within the solution. It can make the execution difficult. Many features can easily be eliminated and it would help streamline the solution. They should get rid of 80% of the features and then really focus on the leftover 20% to make it a really great product."

"Accessing some functions is a bit obscure and requires some knowledge of how the product works, but the upgrade from v2012 to 2014 improved that situation and I expect the upcoming upgrade to 2017 to further streamline operations."

"Expense management, simulation scenarios, and budget control could be great and useful features to include."

"Limited unless you purchase additional support hours."

"The user interface is quirky and does not always conform to the expected Microsoft UI standards."

"It would also be nice to see some improvements on the IBM Cognos Analytics. There's still work to be done on the analytics side of things, like your condition formality."

"The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance."

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current."

More Planview Daptiv cons

"The downside of Smartsheet is that there are some security concerns. We were able to restrict people from sharing sheets with anyone who was not in our domain, but it could be easier. We also found it hard to restrict certain user groups from adding attachments to sheets."

"Areas for improvement in Smartsheet include better integration capabilities with other technologies through APIs and addressing limitations in reporting functionalities."

"If there was some way to store more complex files in the system, or if there was a back-end structure where you could store files, that would be ideal."

"Initially, there were issues like dropdowns. Those have been overcome."

"The integration with Microsoft products should be improved."

"I want to improve baselines, predecessor-successor relationships, and the ability to use manual starts and stops while keeping relationships intact. Changing dates and durations can be convoluted, unlike in Microsoft Project. There are many things I'm used to in other software that don't happen in Smartsheet. It's offset by how easy it is to link sheets and pull data at higher levels, but figuring out why I can't change data sometimes can be frustrating."

"The dashboard is not user-friendly, it needs improvement."

"You were forced to create a new tab rather than add another sheet."

More Smartsheet cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a yearly license, but it's not an open license. It's based on users and their roles. So your administrator is priced differently from your timesheet user."

"The licensing is pretty complex. Each kind of user is a different price. It's approximately $300 per year. They charge additional fees for technical support and other additional services."

"It is less expensive than Microsoft Project for enterprise or Oracle Primavera by an order of magnitude. If you buy a Microsoft Project license, it's probably $300 or so by itself, whereas Smartsheet is probably less than $50 per head."

"There's a license for Smartsheet, and the enterprise plan comes down to about $750. My company also pays an extra $60 monthly apart from the standard licensing fee."

"There would be more extensive usage if the solution were cheaper. It's really expensive right now, and that's why we provide a few licenses for admins. The rest of them are just users without admin privileges."

"For a normal license, like the one I had: I had my own Smartsheet because I wanted to play with it and I didn't want to mess with what I was doing in Verizon, so I paid $200 monthly, and it gave me all the same functionalities, so I could do whatever I wanted for $200. The problem is if you have anyone else working on it or deploying on it, it's $200 a month for every single person who's deployed on it, that's working on it as an owner or an administrator, so owners and administrators are the only ones who can change, edit, and add data to worksheets and columns. Depending on the size of your organization, Smartsheet can be costly. As for implementing its Control Center, Smartsheet forces you to have three people come in: it's a minimum of three people from Smartsheet for three months who will provide you the solutions for the Control Center side, and that's $150 an hour, so it can become very expensive. For my company, not having the Control Center would save on the setup fees and then the $20,000 a year, because the Control Center of Smartsheet is a yearly subscription of $20,000."

"This licensing is straightforward and they charge per user."

"The solution is expensive."

"If I'm not mistaken, it was pretty manageable. It was about 200 bucks a seed. The business really felt a strong need for it. So, it was viewed as a safer and more straightforward cost that we were willing to pay as compared to Domo, which took some convincing."

"Smartsheet only requires licenses for project managers. When we were using Asana, we had to purchase a license for everyone who wanted to access their tasks and use the system. That gets costly fast. It was one of the main reasons we left Asana. As Asana and these other tools scale, they become way more expensive."

More Smartsheet pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

18%

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	22

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Has anyone moved from Microsoft Project to Smartsheet? How has your experience been with Smartsheet?

Hi @Eire Zimmermann, I helped an organization evaluate both MS-Project and Smartsheet when they were conducting their PM tool RFP. The short of it is this, MS Project is not caught up with the mo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Smartsheet?

Licensing might be cheaper per user. I rate it as seven or eight due to its demanding nature. For personal use, I have a monthly subscription, while the company uses an annual basis.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Smartsheet?

Currently, I feel that Smartsheet fulfills all my needs. However, I need to investigate more about the product to identify specific areas for improvement.

See all answers

Comparisons

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 10% of the time

Jira vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 9% of the time

Wrike vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 9% of the time

Planview PPM Pro vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 5% of the time

Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 5% of the time

More Planview Daptiv Competitors

monday.com vs Smartsheet

Compared 6% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs Smartsheet

Compared 6% of the time

Wrike vs Smartsheet

Compared 6% of the time

Jira vs Smartsheet

Compared 5% of the time

Asana vs Smartsheet

Compared 4% of the time

More Smartsheet Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv

October 2026

Download Planview Daptiv product report

Buyer's Guide

Smartsheet

October 2026

Download Smartsheet product report

Overview

Planview Daptiv offers robust project management capabilities with a focus on resource allocation, capacity planning, and collaboration.

Planview Daptiv is known for its excellent reporting, flexibility, and no-code functionalities. It includes beneficial portfolio views and comprehensive dashboards while integrating with IBM Cognos for enhanced analytics. The platform's timekeeping feature efficiently records billable hours, and its project boards and task management add significant value. However, improvements are needed in areas like expense management and resource allocation. Some users encounter complex and outdated features. Enhanced security measures, better integrations with tools like ITFM, and improved analytics would boost its utility.

What are the standout features of Planview Daptiv?

Resource Allocation: Efficiently manage and allocate resources across projects.
Capacity Planning: Support project planning and execution with effective capacity planning tools.
Collaboration: Enhance team collaboration through powerful integrated tools.
Reporting: Utilize excellent reporting capabilities for comprehensive insights.
No-code Functionality: Easily create features without special coding skills.

What benefits should users focus on in reviews?

Improved Project Oversight: Centralize project management across multiple scenarios.
Increased Productivity: Streamlined timekeeping and task management processes.
Enhanced Analytics: Benefit from advanced analytics with IBM Cognos integration.
Optimized Resource Use: Make informed decisions with resource allocation and capacity planning.

Organizations use Planview Daptiv in IT and construction projects, multi-project oversight, and comprehensive tracking. Consultancy firms employ it for PSA activities, aiding in the implementation process. It supports new project management offices post-merger for technical tasks, similar to Jira.

Planview

Smartsheet offers a comprehensive platform for project management, featuring real-time sharing, cloud accessibility, and a user-friendly interface, which enhance workflow efficiency and project tracking capabilities.

Smartsheet stands out in the realm of project management by integrating robust tools like Gantt chart creation and seamless compatibility with products like Jira and Microsoft Teams. Its dashboards, intuitive design, and flexible customization options support efficient collaboration and centralized management. Enhancements such as real-time change visibility without refreshing, advanced automation capabilities, and improved integration with APIs address user needs. Sectors spanning from strategic initiatives to operational tasks benefit from this customizable, cloud-based platform.

What are the key features of Smartsheet?

Real-Time Sharing: Facilitates immediate collaboration across teams.
Cloud Accessibility: Work from anywhere with cloud-based tools.
User-Friendliness: Simplified project management through an intuitive interface.
Gantt Chart Creation: Offers dynamic timelines for project tracking.
Integrations: Seamless connectivity with Jira, Microsoft Teams, and more.

What benefits or ROI does Smartsheet provide?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamline workflows for quicker project completion.
Improved Collaboration: Centralized tools support teamwork and communication.
Project Tracking: Real-time updates keep projects on schedule.
Customizable Solutions: Adaptable to meet diverse management needs.

In specific industries, Smartsheet is leveraged for creating project plans, managing tasks, and compiling statistics. Teams use dashboards for data visualization to monitor multiple projects efficiently. The platform supports resource management, approvals, and collaboration, integrating features like automation and data export for comprehensive project oversight.

Smartsheet

Sample Customers

AOS Studley, Austrian Airlines, bpost bank, Employees Provident Fund, Stena Metall, VitalityHealth, Precor

Sony Music, ESPN, Hilton, Unisource, Colliers, Extreme Networks, Groupon, Netflix

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv vs. Smartsheet

November 2026

Free Report: Planview Daptiv vs. Smartsheet

Find out what your peers are saying about Planview Daptiv vs. Smartsheet and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Planview Daptiv vs. Smartsheet report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors, best Project Portfolio Management vendors, and best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.