OpsRamp vs Stackify comparison

OpsRamp and Stackify are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. OpsRamp is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.4, while Stackify is ranked #59. OpsRamp holds a 2.8% mindshare in IM, compared to Stackify’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of OpsRamp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Stackify users who would recommend it.

OpsRamp

Read 13 OpsRamp reviews

4,398 Views
3,342 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Stackify

Read 6 Stackify reviews

822 Views
452 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

OpsRamp

Stackify

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Stackify and OpsRamp are both key players in the monitoring and management software space. Stackify is favored by cost-conscious buyers for affordability and support, while OpsRamp is preferred by those seeking robust capabilities for comprehensive solutions.

Features: Stackify offers application performance monitoring, error tracking, and deep insights with simple setup. OpsRamp includes incident management, analytics, and extensive infrastructure monitoring.

Room for Improvement: Stackify could enhance integration options, extend its feature set, and improve scalability for larger enterprises. OpsRamp can refine ease of use, reduce setup complexity, and streamline user interface navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Stackify enables easy and quick deployment with effective support, ideal for smaller teams. OpsRamp may be more complex to deploy but offers strong support for larger enterprises.

Pricing and ROI: Stackify provides competitive pricing, offering good ROI for smaller budgets. OpsRamp, with its higher initial cost, delivers long-term value through its extensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed OpsRamp vs. Stackify Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpsRamp vs. Stackify

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,484 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpsRamp

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (2nd), AIOps (6th)

Stackify

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

59th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (61st), Log Management (61st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of OpsRamp is 2.8%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Stackify is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Umair Gulfam

Implementation Engineer at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Automates Azure resource monitoring and inventory management but slow with real-time patch status

There is room for improvement in the performance of the product. The main problem is with patch management. The actual problem we're facing is with the patch management feature. It's not real-time, which creates inconsistencies. The machine might say there are no updates available, while the OpsRamp agent reports that everything's patched. It's a mismatch. We recently started a new marketplace for clients where we manage patch management. We try to share knowledge with OpsRamp, but they don't have a rapid process for product enhancements. Our main pain point is the lack of engagement from the product team. If someone from OpsRamp could discuss our concerns, work on future enhancements, or even give us an estimated timeline (ETA), it would be a huge improvement.

Read full review

Kalyan Somisetty

Senior Developer at PRESIS KONSULT

Simple, easy to configure, and offers trial versions

In the next version, which I want to try, it'll show the comparison of the old responses of the APS. For example, how much time the old response and the new response with the changes. Right now, I cannot differentiate. The graphical interface should be able to capture nicely how much time it has taken and it should be very clear. Sometimes it confuses us. For example, what is this APA for? What were the average responses and how many requests have happened? It needs to give a clear picture. They should enable request and response capturing in the Stackify user interface to show what the request for the APA is. Then, it'll be very good. It should be able to capture the payload. For example, what is the request and what is the response? If it has a nice way of capturing everything then it would be easy. There is no need of using ELK again for logging. As of now, people will use Stackify or maybe Grafana for seeing the stats of the application or responses, however, it doesn't have the capabilities to show everything. People will go for any exception handling or checking the request and response in the ELK. If Stackify can do this future, then it'll be an easier single tool. It is anyway intercepting the logs, application logs. I don't think it's a big matter to capture extra data with the requested response. That requested response capturing also should be configurable since some people want the question response to be captured and for the people that don't want it, we can use that feature. It can be enabled as desired. Many people are using different monitoring tools like ELK, LogStash, and Splunk - many other tools. However, if you can make this kind of performance tool cover everything, then they will not shift to other solutions. It should be easily scalable and configurable in different instances. For example, if the same application is scaled up to differently, it should be easily integrable into Kubernetes pipelines. They should offer plugins to make it more easily integratable. For development enrollment, it should be free to use.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It greatly assists small and medium-sized businesses in using the ITSM, alerting, and monitoring features."

"The technical support is fantastic, and they are fast to respond."

"We find the products seamless integration with Zendesk to be extremely valuable to our business."

"It is a pretty stable solution."

"Predictive analysis is a valued feature."

"The multi-tenant architecture capability of OpsRamp has helped me streamline and improve the processes within my organization."

"The most valuable feature of this solution in my experience, is that the available reporting is quite accurate."

"The feature that we have found most useful are the dashboards, which can be built in minutes using this solution, allowing multiple products, thresholds, or any given required metric to be seen in a single area."

More OpsRamp pros

"The deployment is very fast."

"The solution is stable and reliable."

"The filter feature on Stackify is one of the features I found valuable. It's awesome. When I want to get the application logs, the solution gives me many filters. For example, if I want to get logs from my test environment, the option is there for me to select the environment from Stackify, and you can also select the particular application, and you'll see the information you need there. The filter feature alone and the fact that Stackify offers a lot of different filters is what I like the most about the solution because I've used other tools with the filter feature, but the filtering was very difficult, versus Stackify that has good filtering. On Stackify, you can filter the information by the last one hour, or the last four hours, and you can also select the date range and specify the timestamp, then the solution will give you the information based on the date range you specified. Another feature I found valuable on Stackify is its rating feature because it tells you how your application is faring. For example, a rating of A means excellent, while a rating of F means very bad, or that your application is not doing well at all. The ratings are from A to F. I also like that Stackify helps you in terms of load management because the solution gives you information on overutilized resources. These are the most valuable features of the solution."

"The performance dashboard and the accurate level of details are beneficial."

Cons

"We would like this solution to be developed into a full CMP tool, so that we are able to use a single product for all of our cloud management needs."

"OpsRamp had shortcomings associated with its network capabilities."

"We have 55 AVDs, and patches might roll out to 32-35 initially, with the rest taking a month or so. OpsRamp can't detect them all directly. Since clients want patches applied as soon as possible, we manually patch those remaining devices."

"Automation is currently quite complex and needs to be improved."

"I would like to see two things. The first is a self-service portal for the cloud, any cloud deployments, and the second is maturity validation towards ITSM, internalizing OpsRamp TSM. As a result, instead of integrating with more mature tools similar to ServiceNow, people will use OpsRamp."

"What's lacking in OpsRamp is process automation, and if there is, I wish there could be more of it, other than just spikes, or it would be better if the alerts can be generated based on different matrices. That option is absent in OpsRamp at the moment, and it would be valuable if that could be provided in the solution, especially if there's any kind of security issue in the VM."

"OpsRamp cannot be scaled for big and large company deployments."

"The user interface of this product requires some changes as it is not inclusively user-friendly. For example, the performance indicators are color-based , which means that they are confusing for anyone who is color blind."

More OpsRamp cons

"The search feature could be improved."

"I've not used Stackify for a while, and I'm currently using a solution now that's not as good as Stackify. Among the solutions I've been using so far, Stackify has been one of the best for me, but there's always room for improvement. For example, I don't know if it's just me, but when I try to get the log from Stackify, sometimes it doesn't appear in real-time. It takes a few minutes before the logs appear. When I redeploy my solution and the application starts, I don't see the logs immediately, and it would take two to three minutes before I see the logs. I don't know if other customers have a similar experience. It's the wait time for the logs to appear that's a concern for me, could be improved, and is what the Stackify team should be looking into. In terms of any additional feature that I'd like added to the solution, I'm not sure if Stackify has a way to export logs out. I've been trying to do it. On the solution, you can click on a spiral-like icon and it shows you the entire error, and I'd prefer an export button that would let me download the error and save that into a text file, for example, so it'll be available on my local machine for me to reference it, especially because the log keeps going and as you're using the solution, the system keeps pushing messages on to Stackify, so if I'm looking at a particular error at 12:05 PM, for example, by the time I go back to my system and would like to revisit the error at 12:25 PM, on Stackify, the logs would have gone past that level and I won't see it again which makes it difficult. When you now go back to that timestamp, you don't tend to see it immediately, but if the solution had an export feature for me to save that particular error information on my local machine for reference at a later time, I won't have to go back to Stackify. I just go to that log, specifically to that particular export that I've received on my local machine. I can get it and review it, and it would be easier that way versus me going back to Stackify to find that particular error and request that particular information."

"I would like to be able to see metrics about individual running containers on the host machines."

"It should be easily scalable and configurable in different instances."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is an annual licensing fee to use OpsRamp."

"You pay it for a year and you'll have full access to the entire platform, not only for monitoring and alerting, you will have access to the entire platform, and whatever technology they develop will be made available to you."

"OpsRamp is a cost-effective solution."

"I don't have any idea about the licensing cost for OpsRamp, but I just know that its pricing is based on the resource count for each tenant."

"The price is variable. It depends on how much data we have received in that particular month. Usually, it goes up to $2,000, or, at times, $3,000 USD per month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

Media Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about OpsRamp?

Most features work fine.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpsRamp?

I share the impression that OpsRamp pricing is fair; it does not strike me as expensive, and the licensing model is clear enough.

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpsRamp?

If we treat OpsRamp as an infrastructure monitoring tool, there are many positive aspects. However, when viewed as an AIOps tool, there are numerous potential additions. Currently, it performs infr...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs OpsRamp

Compared 14% of the time

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs OpsRamp

Compared 12% of the time

Datadog vs OpsRamp

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs OpsRamp

Compared 8% of the time

LogicMonitor vs OpsRamp

Compared 6% of the time

More OpsRamp Competitors

New Relic vs Stackify

Compared 46% of the time

Dynatrace vs Stackify

Compared 32% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Stackify

Compared 23% of the time

More Stackify Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpsRamp

August 2025

Download OpsRamp product report

Buyer's Guide

Stackify

July 2025

Download Stackify product report

Overview

OpsRamp is a leading cloud-based digital IT operations management platform. The solution allows your organization to leverage hybrid observability, process automation, and machine learning to modernize IT operations. OpsRamp can handle the speed, scope, and scale of modern IT and can help you drive productivity and business value. In addition, it can help your business manage, monitor, and consolidate your point tools and applications.

OpsRamp Features

OpsRamp has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Modern infrastructure monitoring: OpsRamp provides end-to-end visibility across applications, data centers, public clouds, point tools, and more.

Intelligent incident management: With this OpsRamp feature, you gain better problem identification, impact analysis, and first response for incidents with a streamlined process. This leads to proactive resolution and automated remediation that natively integrates with your ITSM tools.

Modern IT operations management: OpsRamp can help you consolidate your multiple point tools with its modern, SaaS-based IT operations platform. The solution can combine artificial intelligence, hybrid infrastructure monitoring, incident remediation, and service and topology mapping, so it can easily evolve with your organization

Service-centric AIOps: OpsRamp gives you the ability to examine your incidents, establish a tight feedback loop between your different teams, and reduce alert floods. Additionally, the solution enables your organization to deliver quick resolutions by using OpsQ, its artificial intelligence-powered event management engine.

Cloud migration: OpsRamp is a true multi-tenant, multi-tier SaaS platform that helps you move more applications and workloads to the cloud faster.

Curated dashboards: By using OpsRamp, IT teams can build curated dashboards using PromQL queries. A central dashboard repository can also be created if needed, and dashboards can be reused for shared IT services as necessary.

Topology maps: With OpsRamp’s service-aware topology maps, you are able to keep track of your entire hybrid IT infrastructure, enabling you to troubleshoot issues by using real-time dependencies for hybrid services.

OpsRamp Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing OpsRamp. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Autodiscovery: OpsRamp auto-discovers multi-cloud and on-premises infrastructure across your IT environment and maps it to your IT services.

Multi-cloud telemetry and real-time events: The solution captures multi-cloud telemetry and real-time events as they occur so that your organization is able to make data-driven decisions by using the right performance and consumption insights.

Take action faster: OpsQ, the solution’s AIOps event management engine, drives faster incident resolution and helps reduce MTTD/MTTR of business-critical services.

Improved efficiency: OpsRamp helps deliver IT operations as a service. With the platform, you can automate workloads, manage multi-cloud costs, and see your IT operations become more efficient.

Flexible integrations: With OpsRamp, you do not have to get rid of your existing tools. The OpsRamp platform can consolidate them all into one contextual view using the metrics that matter most.

Monitoring integration support: OpsRamp delivers monitoring integration support for more than 150 cloud services across the leading three cloud providers: Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud.

OpsRamp

Stackify is an application performance management (APM) solution that combines application performance monitoring with logs, errors, and reporting. It is a SaaS solution that is developer-focused. Users can quickly scan, identify, and repair issues with applications. Stackify APM offers valuable tools, such as Prefix and Retrace, which help to make it a comprehensive and valuable APM solution. Stackify is now part of the Netreo family of IT Infrastructure Management (ITIM), which is considered one of the fastest-growing IT organizations in the marketplace today.

Stackify Prefix

Stackify Prefix helps developers write better code, faster. The tool examines, tests, and approves code as it is being written. Almost every new application is code-perfect, negating the need for exhausting troubleshooting and frustrating time-consuming code review.

Prefix is able to discover poor-performing SQL queries, ORM queries, potential bottlenecks, and concealed exceptions prior to moving the application into production.

Prefix offers Summary Dashboards, intuitive suggestions, integrated logs, and distributed tracing. Distributed tracing expands visibility to cloud-native applications, microservices, and containers and can also provide additional transparency to cache services, web services, third-party services, and more. Users are able to easily move from logs to traces and back.

This valuable tool ensures developers are able to consistently release the best code possible in the least amount of time, while improving performance, productivity, and profitability.

Prefix is a very robust and easy-to-use tool. It can be used seamlessly with Linux, macOS, and Windows. Prefix integrates well with numerous languages, such as Java, Python, Ruby, PHP, Node.js, .Net, and .Net Core.

Stackify Retrace

Stackify Retrace is a user-friendly, trusted APM solution used in more than fifty countries worldwide. Users know that Retrace is able to ensure they can complete quicker, more efficient application development and consistently enhance overall application performance by suggesting important intuitive suggestions users need.

This solution is beneficial to both developers (Dev) and operations (Ops) personnel to learn to improve code and immediately finetune issues by:

Establishing effortless collaboration between Dev and Ops personnel via an easy-to-use GUI dashboard.
Delivering complete transparency of all stages of the application development process, from pre-development to production.
Utilizing performance protocols, such as error tracking, application logs, and code profiling, in real time in order to thoroughly understand how long a code will take to complete various tasks.
Improving overall efficiency and productivity by immediately discovering and repairing application issues.

Retrace Real User Monitoring (RUM) uses both front-end and back-end monitoring to give users a complete picture of what is going on with the applications. This intuitive dashboard displays performance with a complete breakdown of resource usage and integrates the server-side and client traces into one engaging, user-friendly, extensive view.

Retrace is an out-of-the-box solution that works seamlessly with Java stacks, PHP, Node.js, Ruby, Python, .Net, and .Net Core. It is also compatible with many of today’s popular frameworks, such as AWS, Azure, Elasticsearch, MongoDB, MySQL, Oracle, PostgreSQL, Redis, and SQL Server. Additionally, Retrace will work effectively with many cloud providers, containers, and languages, and offers excellent and easy integration with today's favorite tools such as Jira, Slack, Jenkins, and more.

Stackify

Sample Customers

Epsilon, CloudBrix, GreenPages, NIIT Technologies

MyRacePass, ClearSale, Newitts, Carbonite, Boston Software, Children's International, Starkwood Media Group, Fewzion

Buyer's Guide

OpsRamp vs. Stackify

July 2025

Free Report: OpsRamp vs. Stackify

Find out what your peers are saying about OpsRamp vs. Stackify and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpsRamp vs. Stackify report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.