OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs OpenText AI Operations Management comparison

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. OpenText AI Operations Management

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText AI Operations Mana...

Ranking in Event Monitoring

4th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Operations Analytics (5th), Cloud Monitoring Software (19th)

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Ranking in Event Monitoring

10th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mainframe Management (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Event Monitoring category, the mindshare of OpenText AI Operations Management is 8.2%, up from 6.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is 4.1%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Event Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText AI Operations Management	8.2%
OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence	4.1%
Other	87.7%

Event Monitoring

Featured Reviews

reviewer2060121

Product Line Manager at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees

Unified monitoring has improved event handling but needs stronger AI automation and modern dashboards

OpenText AI Operations Management could benefit from a fully integrated AI system, which we call AIOps. A fully integrated AI operations system would be valuable in the future. Additionally, the UI experience could be more comfortable. We are not using predictive features in OpenText AI Operations Management such as anomaly detection. In the future, we may be able to operate with our customer, but we need to decide this collectively. You need to see the big picture and understand what the customer's pain points are to find the right tuning. Normally, predictive features can be more useful, but this is an end-to-end solution that needs to be customized. You need to understand the exact customer needs. The predictive analytics feature is very close to being integrated, but it is not fully integrated at this time.

Read full review

Sakkamon Rapeepisarn

System Programmer at Krungsri

Automation has improved alerts and file handling but script-based setup still needs simplification

OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence is the automation tool I use. I think OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence is good for creating complex rules because it's coding, but it takes time to learn how to use it. OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence works well if you know the syntax very well and you have experience in creating scripts or REXX syntax; it would be very good and is a good tool, but it takes time to learn, so that is for experienced staff to work with. I would rate the product a six from one to ten. I cannot think of any additional features in the next release of OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable aspect of Operations Bridge for us is its integration capabilities."

"The most valuable feature is the seamless monitoring of both Windows and Unix servers."

"The ability to integrate directly with the RIPM on top of DSM, using the event feed into OMI, the metrics feed, and features like SHA offers opportunities for faster root cause analysis."

"Flexible dashboard with the availability of widgets."

"We have a bunch of critical servers and applications, and we are able to monitor using this product to create a dashboard and have automatic alerts to notify the responsible team."

"It helps us to take into account all of our infrastructure, monitoring everything as one single point of truth, with flexible configuration to correlate systems and applications so our systems stay under control and in check."

"It optimizes their operations efficiency, and makes people more focused on the issue at hand instead of trying to figure out what's going on."

"The integration with the ticketing tool makes sure that there is a record for every issue."

More OpenText AI Operations Management pros

"The performance of it is beyond exceptional."

"For the mainframe it's a really good automation tool, it's been really solid for what we needed it for, and it's been flexible and scalable across the enterprise."

"With the automation pieces we can bring this region up or take this region down, and it allows us to always meet our time critical requirements."

"OPS/MVS is doing things more efficiently than a person would do; they may make mistakes; finger checks here."

"We used to us an IBM product, but OPS/MVS has a lot more flexibility in what we can do with it."

"It reduces the number of repetitive motions required by a human to respond to the system."

"For what it was produced for, it's an excellent product; it's done everything that we wanted to do with the product and more, which has been a really big help for us."

"The follow-up surprised me. Making sure that I am happy with what I have gone to them on. They will call after I have made changes and verify that I am happy with the changes that I did have to make. If it did not fix the complete problem, they go back over it until I am satisfied."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence pros

Cons

"Depending on where you land, if you get stuck in generic level-two support, then it’s quite uninspiring – that’s probably the best description."

"The pricing is a bit expensive for smaller companies."

"The deployment of agents on new CI should be improved. There should be some kind of automation to directly deploy them from the console. It can maybe have some more AI functions because most of the other tools are going in that direction."

"Stability could have been better. We were running into problems sometimes where the whole system was not performing as we expected."

"The UI could be better. The ease of use, deployment, upgrades, and licensing could be better."

"The price is quite expensive, and because of this, we may try another solution."

"There is need to have more out-of-the-box support for HPE products itself."

"I'm not aware of areas that need improvement."

More OpenText AI Operations Management cons

"The new release addressed some shortcomings of the product."

"With stability, sometimes we do have problems with this product."

"The mainframe TSO side still displays green screens."

"The reason sometimes it is not stable, we do not have the expertise to write the script."

"The only issue we have is when we try to integrate with common services."

"Performing a stop/restart of OPS/MVS could be a little smoother. Without special coding, some undesired tasks will be started and some necessary tasks will be stopped if we have to bounce OPS/MVS during the day."

"One of the things we've been wanting to do is to be able to automate off of different highlighted messages without actually knowing what the message is."

"Some of the command sequences are too long."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is very high."

"Setup costs can be high depending on the partner, but it is worth it."

"Pricing is very flexible and depends on the modules selected as per the requirement."

"The licensing model for Micro Focus Operations Bridge is unit-based so it can be one device or ten devices depending on your situation or model. Cost-wise, it's much more if you have more devices and features such as infrastructure monitoring, analytic dashboard, and business dashboard in your model."

"It is competitive."

"The licensing cost for this solution is approximately $1,000 USD."

"As OpsBridge is a suite of products bundled together, you may find yourself paying for software functionality that you don't actually use, e.g. Real User Monitor (RUM)."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Construction Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

14%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	35

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	25

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Operations Bridge?

From a cost perspective, OpenText Operations Bridge is cost-effective as it saves us man hours. What used to be done manually by a person is now done automatically. With its automation capabilities...

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Operations Bridge?

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Operations Bridge?

I am not looking for a monitoring solution, but I am a product manager comparing some products based on research I conducted on the PeerSpot website regarding monitoring products such as Splunk, Ap...

What needs improvement with OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence?

My impressions on OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence is that it's quite difficult to use, as it relies mainly on the coding syntax and doesn't provide an easy-to-use GUI. OPS_MVS should have an easy-t...

What is your primary use case for OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence?

We use the auto-purge transaction for some transactions that run very long, and we also use automation to open and close files in CICS as well.

What advice do you have for others considering OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence?

BMC TrueSight vs OpenText AI Operations Management

Comparisons

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact vs OpenText AI Operations Management

Compared 7% of the time

ScienceLogic vs OpenText AI Operations Management

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs OpenText AI Operations Management

Compared 6% of the time

Evanios vs OpenText AI Operations Management

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText AI Operations Management Competitors

SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 16% of the time

BMC AMI Ops vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 10% of the time

IBM OMEGAMON vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Tivoli Business Service Manager vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 9% of the time

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText AI Operations Management

Download OpenText AI Operations Management product report

OpenText AI Operations Management report

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Download OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Operations Bridge, Operations Bridge Manager, Micro Focus Operations Analytics

CA OPS MVS Event Management and Automation, CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation, Unicenter CA-OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation

Overview

OpenText AI Operations Management centralizes event correlation and monitoring across infrastructures, prioritizing scalability and automation for efficient alert management. It empowers organizations with transparency and insights essential for effective IT resource management in hybrid cloud environments.

OpenText AI Operations Management offers comprehensive solutions for event correlation, integration, and centralized alert management. With capabilities that streamline operations, this tool supports efficient IT management across AWS, GCP, and on-premises environments. Despite requiring improvements in performance and usability, its robust reporting and seamless monitoring provide valuable insights for root cause analysis. Users leverage this platform to integrate event data, automate incidents, and manage hybrid infrastructures effectively, making it a key component in enhancing service perspectives globally. Its heavy architecture and reliance on Java and Flash, coupled with complex licensing and pricing, necessitate attention to functionality and support areas.

What are the key features of OpenText AI Operations Management?

Event Correlation: Integrates and correlates event data for improved incident response.
Centralized Alerts: Raises alerts efficiently to streamline IT operations.
Comprehensive Dashboard: Consolidates information for better visibility.
Hybrid Cloud Support: Manages AWS, GCP, and on-premises environments.
Automation: Enhances operations with server automation and performance management.

What benefits do users find with OpenText AI Operations Management?

Operational Efficiency: Streamlines IT processes for quicker issue resolution.
Transparency: Offers robust reporting and data centralization for clarity.
Resource Management: Improves management of IT resources and service perspectives.
Scalability: Accommodates growth with flexible architecture.
Noise Reduction: Decreases event noise to enhance response efficiency.

OpenText AI Operations Management is widely implemented in industries requiring comprehensive monitoring capabilities. Organizations benefit from its ability to consolidate tools and manage events effectively across hybrid environments. The integration of incident automation and performance evaluation tools is particularly beneficial for those looking to enhance compliance support and reduce response times. Despite some challenges, the platform remains a valuable asset in managing complex IT environments and improving operational effectiveness.

OpenText

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is designed for effective mainframe automation with flexibility and user convenience, offering tools for synchronized operations and comprehensive platform automation.

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence provides robust automation features that streamline mainframe operations, enhancing task synchronization and minimizing manual interventions. Its adaptability across multiple platforms, integration capabilities, and support for ad hoc operations ensure an efficient automation environment. However, users identify potential improvements in setup, third-party compatibility, graphical interfaces, and documentation. While it serves diverse automation needs, enhancing web interfaces and API accessibility could further improve user experience.

What are the key features of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence?

Automatic IPL and Shutdown: Ensures orderly system startups and shutdowns.
System State Manager: Offers synchronized task operations for consistent system states.
OPSLOG: Enables message filtering to streamline communications.
Global Variables: Facilitates script customization and variable management.
OPS/REXX Support: Supports ad hoc operations for versatility in automation tasks.

What benefits and ROI can organizations expect?

Labor Minimization: Reduces manual task handling through automation.
Comprehensive Integration: Seamless connection with legacy applications for smooth operations.
Resource Control: Efficient management of resources across LPARs.
Enhanced Workflow Management: Improved automation of time-critical functions.

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is widely deployed in industries requiring high-level automation for mainframe environments. Organizations benefit from its capabilities in message suppression, system activity monitoring, startup and shutdown management, and resource control. Its efficient automation helps in inventory control and ensures seamless function integrations within diverse operational settings.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

GE Money Bank, Bank AlJazira, Tech Mahindra

Tieto

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. OpenText AI Operations Management