OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs OpenText AI Operations Management comparison

OpenText and Broadcom are both solutions in the Event Monitoring category. OpenText is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while Broadcom is ranked #10. OpenText holds a 7.6% mindshare in EM, compared to Broadcom’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

OpenText AI Operations Mana...

Read 49 OpenText AI Operations Management reviews

1,868 Views
747 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Read 27 OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence reviews

762 Views
434 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText AI Operations Mana...

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

OpenText AI Operations Management and OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence are products competing in the AI-driven operations sector. OpenText is favored for its pricing, while OPS/MVS is preferred for its superior features and robust functionality, particularly in complex enterprise environments.

Features: OpenText AI Operations Management offers strong automation capabilities and analytics tools, making it a good option for businesses focused on those areas. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence, on the other hand, provides comprehensive system integration, advanced monitoring features, and flexibility to adapt to new technologies. Its extensive feature set is particularly beneficial for intricate and complex enterprise environments.

Room for Improvement: OpenText AI Operations Management could benefit from more flexibility in system integrations and an updated user interface to improve the user experience. Additionally, enhancing monitoring capabilities and expanding automation beyond current offerings could add value. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence might improve by simplifying its deployment process, enhancing user-friendliness, and reducing initial setup complexity. Offering more streamlined processes for less technically inclined users could broaden its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText AI Operations Management is known for its straightforward deployment process and comprehensive customer support, focusing heavily on ensuring customer success. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence, though having a more complex deployment model, provides specialized support services to ensure successful implementation and operation. OpenText's simplicity in deployment is appealing for businesses seeking a hassle-free setup.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText AI Operations Management offers a competitive pricing structure that supports quicker ROI, making it attractive to cost-conscious businesses. Despite a higher initial cost, OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence delivers significant long-term value with its extensive feature set, which can justify the investment for organizations prioritizing functionality and comprehensive system capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. OpenText AI Operations Management Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. OpenText AI Operations Management

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,443 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText AI Operations Mana...

Ranking in Event Monitoring

7th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Operations Analytics (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (20th)

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Ranking in Event Monitoring

10th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mainframe Management (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Event Monitoring category, the mindshare of OpenText AI Operations Management is 7.6%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is 3.8%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Event Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText AI Operations Management	7.6%
OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence	3.8%
Other	88.6%

Event Monitoring

Featured Reviews

reviewer2060121

Product Line Manager at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees

Unified monitoring has improved event handling but needs stronger AI automation and modern dashboards

OpenText AI Operations Management could benefit from a fully integrated AI system, which we call AIOps. A fully integrated AI operations system would be valuable in the future. Additionally, the UI experience could be more comfortable. We are not using predictive features in OpenText AI Operations Management such as anomaly detection. In the future, we may be able to operate with our customer, but we need to decide this collectively. You need to see the big picture and understand what the customer's pain points are to find the right tuning. Normally, predictive features can be more useful, but this is an end-to-end solution that needs to be customized. You need to understand the exact customer needs. The predictive analytics feature is very close to being integrated, but it is not fully integrated at this time.

Read full review

Greg Payne

Sr. Analyst/Technology Infrastructure at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

It automates responses, preventing issues from becoming more severe

I just installed version 12.3, which actually already has a number of new features. It's going to make it easier for some of our new users. I'm old-school, I learned it the old way. I actually want to go back and implement it and start doing things the new way. As I need to train people, it's going to make it easier for them and make the learning curve much shorter. The new release addressed some shortcomings of the product. It was old-school. The learning curve was a little bit long in the beginning, but it's really come a long way.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable aspect of Operations Bridge for us is its integration capabilities."

"The event correlation is the most valuable aspect of the solution."

"The data lake is a very powerful feature within OpenText Operations Bridge."

"The Performance Manager provides great insight into our systems' performance."

"The initial setup is pretty straightforward. It's not complex at all."

"The integration with the ticketing tool makes sure that there is a record for every issue."

"I rate OpenText Operations Bridge as a solid nine on a scale of one to ten."

"The most valuable features of the solution are its grouping scripts and event focus."

More OpenText AI Operations Management pros

"Valuable features include: SSM, which provides for orderly startup and shutdown; OPSLOG, which enables filtering by message-id, and/or jobname(s); Rules, as OPS/REXX interface streamlines deployment, interfaces easily with JES2 and z/OS."

"The service has been wonderful. I like the people that I have had to deal with. The process is very straightforward. I call or use the website."

"It alerts the operators when it is time to repair the communications and the IPLs."

"It's very flexible. You can customize what you need to, which is good. For example, you can do your own coding inside the tool, make your own scripting tooling."

"It reduces the number of repetitive motions required by a human to respond to the system."

"Stability is probably the best out-of-the-box. Put it in, set it up, and you leave it alone. It works wonderfully."

"The performance of it is beyond exceptional. It is probably one of the best products that I have ever worked with. It is easy to use, comprehensive, and can perform almost any task you need it to."

"Their technical support is incredible, immediately responsive, and even if it is not updated to Level 2 support sometimes, they chip in providing more detailed answers and options to fix the problem."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence pros

Cons

"The latest versions of the service reporting dashboards need improvement, such as service modeling."

"I know that in the next version, X1005, they're moving to more graphical overviews, which should help our senior managers."

"The predictive analytics feature is very close to being integrated, but it is not fully integrated at this time."

"Our issues are largely support related due to where we are and the knowledge base that we have here. This issue relates both HPE in general and to the technical products."

"Implementation could be improved."

"The deployment of agents on new CI should be improved. There should be some kind of automation to directly deploy them from the console. It can maybe have some more AI functions because most of the other tools are going in that direction."

"We need improvements in delivering quality reports from OBM and in integrating Operations Bridge with other components like UCMDB for asset discovery."

"In a future release, we would like an improved upgrade process. When you upgrade it now, it first uninstalls everything and then reinstalls all the packages, which means any customization that you've done in the directories on the surface disappears."

More OpenText AI Operations Management cons

"The further expansion of the mainframe teamcenter interface. Also, the web services support is something that I am looking into."

"The reason sometimes it is not stable, we do not have the expertise to write the script."

"The interfaces to USS, CA UIM could be better. CA Common Services interfaces - namely Zdata Mover, Zmessage Service, Zdatacolletcor - are poorly documented."

"Because of its age, it's a little bit difficult to modernize some of the integrations and some of the functions."

"It definitely needs more web-based interface, to be more mobile-open. More APIs, more open source to it."

"The GUI interface could be improved, but that is coming. They are working on that."

"Scalability is zero. It cannot be scaled because of its age."

"Performing a stop/restart of OPS/MVS could be a little smoother. Without special coding, some undesired tasks will be started and some necessary tasks will be stopped if we have to bounce OPS/MVS during the day."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As OpsBridge is a suite of products bundled together, you may find yourself paying for software functionality that you don't actually use, e.g. Real User Monitor (RUM)."

"The licensing cost for this solution is approximately $1,000 USD."

"Setup costs can be high depending on the partner, but it is worth it."

"The cost is very high."

"Pricing is very flexible and depends on the modules selected as per the requirement."

"It is competitive."

"The licensing model for Micro Focus Operations Bridge is unit-based so it can be one device or ten devices depending on your situation or model. Cost-wise, it's much more if you have more devices and features such as infrastructure monitoring, analytic dashboard, and business dashboard in your model."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,443 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

Logistics Company

16%

Educational Organization

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	35

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Operations Bridge?

From a cost perspective, OpenText Operations Bridge is cost-effective as it saves us man hours. What used to be done manually by a person is now done automatically. With its automation capabilities...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Operations Bridge?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Operations Bridge?

I am not looking for a monitoring solution, but I am a product manager comparing some products based on research I conducted on the PeerSpot website regarding monitoring products such as Splunk, Ap...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpsRamp vs OpenText AI Operations Management

Compared 10% of the time

SCOM vs OpenText AI Operations Management

Compared 8% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs OpenText AI Operations Management

Compared 8% of the time

BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps vs OpenText AI Operations Management

Compared 8% of the time

Zabbix vs OpenText AI Operations Management

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText AI Operations Management Competitors

BMC AMI Ops vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 22% of the time

IBM OMEGAMON vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 17% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 13% of the time

SCOM vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 12% of the time

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AI Operations Management

December 2025

OpenText AI Operations Management report

Download OpenText AI Operations Management product report

Buyer's Guide

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

December 2025

Download OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Operations Bridge, Operations Bridge Manager, Micro Focus Operations Analytics

CA OPS MVS Event Management and Automation, CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation, Unicenter CA-OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation

Overview

OpenText AI Operations Management centralizes event correlation and monitoring across infrastructures, prioritizing scalability and automation for efficient alert management. It empowers organizations with transparency and insights essential for effective IT resource management in hybrid cloud environments.

OpenText AI Operations Management offers comprehensive solutions for event correlation, integration, and centralized alert management. With capabilities that streamline operations, this tool supports efficient IT management across AWS, GCP, and on-premises environments. Despite requiring improvements in performance and usability, its robust reporting and seamless monitoring provide valuable insights for root cause analysis. Users leverage this platform to integrate event data, automate incidents, and manage hybrid infrastructures effectively, making it a key component in enhancing service perspectives globally. Its heavy architecture and reliance on Java and Flash, coupled with complex licensing and pricing, necessitate attention to functionality and support areas.

What are the key features of OpenText AI Operations Management?

Event Correlation: Integrates and correlates event data for improved incident response.
Centralized Alerts: Raises alerts efficiently to streamline IT operations.
Comprehensive Dashboard: Consolidates information for better visibility.
Hybrid Cloud Support: Manages AWS, GCP, and on-premises environments.
Automation: Enhances operations with server automation and performance management.

What benefits do users find with OpenText AI Operations Management?

Operational Efficiency: Streamlines IT processes for quicker issue resolution.
Transparency: Offers robust reporting and data centralization for clarity.
Resource Management: Improves management of IT resources and service perspectives.
Scalability: Accommodates growth with flexible architecture.
Noise Reduction: Decreases event noise to enhance response efficiency.

OpenText AI Operations Management is widely implemented in industries requiring comprehensive monitoring capabilities. Organizations benefit from its ability to consolidate tools and manage events effectively across hybrid environments. The integration of incident automation and performance evaluation tools is particularly beneficial for those looking to enhance compliance support and reduce response times. Despite some challenges, the platform remains a valuable asset in managing complex IT environments and improving operational effectiveness.

OpenText

z/OS, its subsystems, databases, middleware, applications, and software generate thousands of event messages daily. IT professionals need a tool to filter, prioritize, and respond quickly to these events before they impact availability and threaten business processing and associated service level agreements. CA OPS/MVS EMA automates processes, enabling you to resolve problems as they arise. It also automates more routine tasks, simplifying IT management and operations.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

GE Money Bank, Bank AlJazira, Tech Mahindra

Tieto

Buyer's Guide

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. OpenText AI Operations Management

December 2025

Free Report: OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. OpenText AI Operations Management

Find out what your peers are saying about OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. OpenText AI Operations Management and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,443 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. OpenText AI Operations Management report.

See our list of best Event Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.