IBM OMEGAMON vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence comparison

IBM and Broadcom are both solutions in the Mainframe Management category. IBM is ranked #2, while Broadcom is ranked #7. IBM holds a 22.8% mindshare in MM, compared to Broadcom’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution.

IBM OMEGAMON

Read 1 IBM OMEGAMON review

948 Views
948 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Read 27 OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence reviews

672 Views
255 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

IBM OMEGAMON

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM OMEGAMON and OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Rocket Software, IBM, BMC and others in Mainframe Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Mainframe Management Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Mainframe Management

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM OMEGAMON

Ranking in Mainframe Management

2nd

Average Rating

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Ranking in Mainframe Management

7th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Mainframe Management category, the mindshare of IBM OMEGAMON is 22.8%, down from 28.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is 4.2%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mainframe Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM OMEGAMON	22.8%
OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence	4.2%
Other	73.0%

Mainframe Management

Featured Reviews

Peter Beylemans

Mainframe Support at AG Insurance

Good stability but it is lacking the ability to see historical information

We can only see online information but there isn't any historical data to see something that happened a few hours previous. We don't have the ability to access that information. Previously, with MainView, we could look back at information from two days before and get information. We could easily get information from Plexus. Now, we don't have a single screen to check which has been annoying. Compared to MainView, Tivoli is rubbish. We are forced to use this solution. We couldn't stay with MainView. I would like for it to be easier to check the system performance. It should have the ability to see historical data. We can't see the percentages to see the percentages of the CPU utilized. We should be able to see how much was used by our part of the system. Now, we have to continuously recalculate that information.

Read full review

Greg Payne

Sr. Analyst/Technology Infrastructure at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

It automates responses, preventing issues from becoming more severe

I just installed version 12.3, which actually already has a number of new features. It's going to make it easier for some of our new users. I'm old-school, I learned it the old way. I actually want to go back and implement it and start doing things the new way. As I need to train people, it's going to make it easier for them and make the learning curve much shorter. The new release addressed some shortcomings of the product. It was old-school. The learning curve was a little bit long in the beginning, but it's really come a long way.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's stable enough. I haven't noticed any problems since it was installed."

"It reduces the number of repetitive motions required by a human to respond to the system."

"Once automatic IPL has been defined, anyone can perform an IPL with very little intervention. We know that all of the components will be started correctly."

"Valuable features include: SSM, which provides for orderly startup and shutdown; OPSLOG, which enables filtering by message-id, and/or jobname(s); Rules, as OPS/REXX interface streamlines deployment, interfaces easily with JES2 and z/OS."

"It allows us to respond faster to issues. If there are issues that come out, we're able to capture a message and alert somebody about it."

"It's very flexible. You can customize what you need to, which is good. For example, you can do your own coding inside the tool, make your own scripting tooling."

"The performance of it is beyond exceptional. It is probably one of the best products that I have ever worked with. It is easy to use, comprehensive, and can perform almost any task you need it to."

"It alerts the operators when it is time to repair the communications and the IPLs."

"Stability is probably the best out-of-the-box. Put it in, set it up, and you leave it alone. It works wonderfully."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence pros

Cons

"We can't see the percentages to see the percentages of the CPU utilized. We should be able to see how much was used by our part of the system. Now, we have to continuously recalculate that information."

"It definitely needs more web-based interface, to be more mobile-open. More APIs, more open source to it."

"Performing a stop/restart of OPS/MVS could be a little smoother. Without special coding, some undesired tasks will be started and some necessary tasks will be stopped if we have to bounce OPS/MVS during the day."

"Some of the command sequences are too long."

"The further expansion of the mainframe teamcenter interface. Also, the web services support is something that I am looking into."

"It’s a complex product. The initial installation is easy, but implementing various functions is a constant process."

"Because of its age, it's a little bit difficult to modernize some of the integrations and some of the functions."

"One thing that comes to mind is the MQ interface. The last time we tried to use it, it seemed a little clunky."

"Scalability is zero. It cannot be scaled because of its age."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence cons

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mainframe Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

11%

Healthcare Company

Logistics Company

17%

Educational Organization

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	24

Comparisons

BMC AMI Ops vs IBM OMEGAMON

Compared 37% of the time

ASG TMON vs IBM OMEGAMON

Compared 27% of the time

SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence vs IBM OMEGAMON

Compared 18% of the time

Rocket Software Mainframe vs IBM OMEGAMON

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Z IntelliMagic Vision for z/OS vs IBM OMEGAMON

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM OMEGAMON Competitors

BMC AMI Ops vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 21% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 14% of the time

SCOM vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 12% of the time

IBM Tivoli Business Service Manager vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 11% of the time

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mainframe Management

December 2025

Download IBM OMEGAMON product report

Buyer's Guide

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

December 2025

Download OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence product report

Also Known As

IBM Candle, Tivoli

CA OPS MVS Event Management and Automation, CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation, Unicenter CA-OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation

Overview

IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON Performance Management Suite for z/OS is designed to provide real-time and historical performance and availability management. It offers these capabilities for IBM z/OS operating system, networks, storage subsystems, Java runtimes, IBM DB2, IBM CICS, IBM IMS, IBM MQ for z/OS and IBM WebSphere Application Server for z/OS in a single package. Optimize the efficiency and effectiveness of managing z/OS environments with a powerful, integrated tool set.

OMEGAMON Performance Management Suite for z/OS is available as part of IBM Service Management Suite for z/OS. IBM Service Management Suite for z/OS includes IBM Service Management Unite—a service management dashboard that brings mainframe management information and tasks from disparate sources into a single environment.

IBM

z/OS, its subsystems, databases, middleware, applications, and software generate thousands of event messages daily. IT professionals need a tool to filter, prioritize, and respond quickly to these events before they impact availability and threaten business processing and associated service level agreements. CA OPS/MVS EMA automates processes, enabling you to resolve problems as they arise. It also automates more routine tasks, simplifying IT management and operations.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Sharp Corporation

Tieto

Find out what your peers are saying about Rocket Software, IBM, BMC and others in Mainframe Management. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Mainframe Management vendors.

We monitor all Mainframe Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.