IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence comparison

IBM and Broadcom are both solutions in the Event Monitoring category. IBM is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.7, while Broadcom is ranked #13. IBM holds a 9.5% mindshare in EM, compared to Broadcom’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 78% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Read 14 IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus reviews

1,167 Views
528 Comparison Views

78% willing to recommend

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Read 27 OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence reviews

205 Views
125 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus and OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence compete in the IT operations enhancement category. Users favor the pricing and support of IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus, but OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is noted for its superior feature set.

Features: IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus offers real-time correlation, root-cause analysis, and supports multi-layered protocols, providing a robust solution across dynamic environments. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence excels in automation and integration features, like the System State Manager and OPSLOG, making it ideal for mainframe operations.

Room for Improvement: IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus could enhance its GUI for better user experience, improve integration with non-IBM databases, and expand protocol compatibility beyond existing standards. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence can benefit from more responsive customer service, simplified user interface, and broader third-party integration possibilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus provides a modular deployment model addressing diverse infrastructures with reliable customer support. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence, focused on mainframe efficiency, offers deeply integrated deployment but requires improvement in customer service responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus features lower setup costs and quick ROI through efficient operations and reliable support. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence requires a higher upfront investment but compensates with long-term returns thanks to its extensive automation and mainframe integration capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Ranking in Event Monitoring

3rd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Ranking in Event Monitoring

13th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mainframe Management (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Event Monitoring category, the mindshare of IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus is 9.5%, up from 8.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is 2.8%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Event Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

Aids in network performance monitoring and management

I am working as a customer, mainly using IntelliQ and another product, IBM NetCool, Watson AI. These products are used for monitoring network performance and management. The primary use case involves network performance monitoring, and it is compatible only with IBM DB2 IBM Tivoli NetCool…

Read full review

it_user351621

IT System Analyst - Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

The ability to use command rules is great when our operators have repetitive tasks, but we'd like to automate off of different highlighted messages without actually knowing what the message is.

One of the things we've been wanting to do is to be able to automate off of different highlighted messages without actually knowing what the message is. For example, we'd like to be able to create some generic automation when we receive a warning or alert message to allow, if nothing else, the automation team to know so we can contact the product owner. If there's something we can do to automate or expedite notification to the proper people, we want to try to do that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is an easy-to-use solution."

"OMNIbus is valuable for its compatibility and performance, as I haven't encountered any performance issues."

"The biggest plus points for me are the configurability and scalability of the solution, as well as the multi-tenancy of the platform."

"Probes are the best feature because they are well written which rarely requires you to write additional rules. These probes monitor activity within your environment."

"Offers very good event/alert drill-down and statistical reporting capabilities."

"IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus supports legacy protocols like CORBA, Huawei, and other telecom protocols, which I find beneficial."

"It's good for managed systems. The end query on the user interface is good. You can view lots of charts and graphs."

"The monitoring is the solution's most valuable feature."

More IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus pros

"It's very flexible. You can customize what you need to, which is good. For example, you can do your own coding inside the tool, make your own scripting tooling."

"It alerts the operators when it is time to repair the communications and the IPLs."

"Because we can define complex commands, the training of new operators is quicker. We can also put checks in place, that will prevent user errors."

"Stability is probably the best out-of-the-box. Put it in, set it up, and you leave it alone. It works wonderfully."

"The documentation is simple, easy to follow, and use. A limited, first-time systems programmer can do it, in that it is out-of-the-box almost functional."

"With the automation pieces we can bring this region up or take this region down, and it allows us to always meet our time critical requirements."

"OPS/REXX is valuable because it allows us almost unlimited flexibility in automating our system."

"It's a very stable product. I very much like the SSM stuff in it. The rules engine, it's awesome."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence pros

Cons

"There should be an easier-to-understand model, more of a flat-structured model rather than different tiers of licenses which complicates licensing."

"The cost of the product is quite high. They should work to adjust their pricing models."

"I would like for the next release to be more user-friendly and out of date. The next release should focus on the cloud, AI, and ML technologies."

"The solution needs to invest in the development of a knowledge base and use of AI services for providing event resolution and intervention directions."

"Its integration could be better. They should provide an easier integration for all the monitoring stuff, and it will make things easier for us. Currently, there is a complexity in integrating it with a vendor application, and we have to use another tool to integrate it with a vendor application. To integrate some applications with NetCool, I need to install an IBM tool on top of it. It would be good if they can provide an API or any kind of interface that we can leverage while developing a new protocol interface or application. We should be able to use an API or interface with NetCool. Its GUI can also be better. As compared to other tools, it is not user friendly, and it is not easy to do stuff through GUI. Whenever we do anything on the GUI, it takes time. They need to focus on the GUI part, especially the dashboard. They should focus on how users can effectively drill down from one box to another. The visual appeal of the dashboard is as important as the data and functionality."

"Areas that could be better include the fact that the solution is only on-premises, lacks AI capabilities, and support response times could be quicker."

"The solution has limitations in database integration as it cannot integrate with databases other than IBM DB2."

"Its technical support team takes longer to reply."

More IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus cons

"The GUI interface could be improved, but that is coming. They are working on that."

"Because of its age, it's a little bit difficult to modernize some of the integrations and some of the functions."

"Scalability is zero. It cannot be scaled because of its age."

"The interfaces to USS, CA UIM could be better. CA Common Services interfaces - namely Zdata Mover, Zmessage Service, Zdatacolletcor - are poorly documented."

"It’s a complex product. The initial installation is easy, but implementing various functions is a constant process."

"One thing that comes to mind is the MQ interface. The last time we tried to use it, it seemed a little clunky."

"It definitely needs more web-based interface, to be more mobile-open. More APIs, more open source to it."

"Performing a stop/restart of OPS/MVS could be a little smoother. Without special coding, some undesired tasks will be started and some necessary tasks will be stopped if we have to bounce OPS/MVS during the day."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its license cost is a little bit more than other solutions. Our customers expect a standard market price that is comparative to other products. For each and every NetCool OMNIbus component, we have to purchase a separate license. These components are not free with the product."

"You have to have the right level of budget to afford this solution."

"It is a costly solution."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

17%

Energy/Utilities Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Logistics Company

21%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus?

The biggest plus points for me are the configurability and scalability of the solution, as well as the multi-tenancy of the platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus?

If the various HW elements are from the same vendor, a monitoring solution provided by that vendor or its partners will potentially result in lower licensing and operational costs. Moreover, for ve...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus?

IBM is working on converting NetCool to NetCool Operations Insight, which runs on Watson AI. There were areas needing improvement in terms of AI, however, they have migrated the entire NetCool suit...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 31% of the time

IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 16% of the time

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 16% of the time

ScienceLogic vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 12% of the time

BigPanda vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 9% of the time

More IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus Competitors

CA Automation Point vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 58% of the time

SCOM vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 42% of the time

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

April 2025

Download IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus product report

Buyer's Guide

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

April 2025

Download OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence product report

Also Known As

Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

CA OPS MVS Event Management and Automation, CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation, Unicenter CA-OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation

Overview

Tivoli Netcool OMNIbus provides near real-time service assurance for business infrastructure, applications, servers, network devices and protocols, Internet protocols, storage and security devices.

IBM

z/OS, its subsystems, databases, middleware, applications, and software generate thousands of event messages daily. IT professionals need a tool to filter, prioritize, and respond quickly to these events before they impact availability and threaten business processing and associated service level agreements. CA OPS/MVS EMA automates processes, enabling you to resolve problems as they arise. It also automates more routine tasks, simplifying IT management and operations.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Consolidated Communications, €sterreichische Bundesbahnen (€BB), Capgemini

Tieto

Buyer's Guide

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

April 2025

Free Report: IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence report.

See our list of best Event Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.