OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs SCOM comparison

Broadcom and Microsoft are both solutions in the Event Monitoring category. Broadcom is ranked #9 with an average rating of 6.0, while Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0. Broadcom holds a 4.0% mindshare in EM, compared to Microsoft’s 9.9% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Read 28 OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence reviews

1,725 Views
932 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

SCOM

Read 83 SCOM reviews

8,966 Views
1,435 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

SCOM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

SCOM and OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence are competing products in IT systems management. SCOM seems to have an advantage in easy integration, particularly with existing Microsoft environments, whereas OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence offers superior automation capabilities.

Features: SCOM offers strong monitoring and reporting features which enhance visibility across networks. It provides seamless integration with Microsoft ecosystems, beneficial for businesses using Microsoft services. Additionally, SCOM offers robust real-time alerts and network monitoring capabilities. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence stands out with its powerful automation features, aiding in proactive management and rapid issue resolution. It includes flexible automation tools and reliable monitoring functions for diverse platforms, ensuring consistent availability.

Room for Improvement: SCOM could improve its automation capabilities to better compete with OPS/MVS. It may also benefit from expanding its support for non-Microsoft environments. Customer feedback suggests that OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence could enhance its ease-of-use for initial setup. There's potential for OPS/MVS to broaden its support for integration with third-party systems and improve its user interface for simpler administration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SCOM benefits from straightforward deployment due to compatibility with Microsoft environments, making it easier for users familiar with Microsoft products. Its customer service is highly regarded for efficient issue resolution. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence, while requiring more setup time due to its extensive automation features, ensures dependable and thorough support services, facilitating smooth deployment and operation.

Pricing and ROI: SCOM generally offers a lower initial setup cost, particularly appealing for businesses on tight budgets, though its ROI may be slow due to limited extensibility. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence, with a higher upfront cost, may deliver better long-term ROI, thanks to efficient automation capabilities and decreased manual interventions. The pricing and ROI differences are crucial for businesses in deciding the appropriate tool for their needs.

To learn more, read our detailed OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. SCOM Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. SCOM

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 892,487 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Ranking in Event Monitoring

9th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mainframe Management (4th)

SCOM

Ranking in Event Monitoring

3rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Event Monitoring category, the mindshare of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is 4.0%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SCOM is 9.9%, up from 7.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Event Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SCOM	9.9%
OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence	4.0%
Other	86.1%

Event Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Sakkamon Rapeepisarn

System Programmer at Krungsri

Automation has improved alerts and file handling but script-based setup still needs simplification

OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence is the automation tool I use. I think OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence is good for creating complex rules because it's coding, but it takes time to learn how to use it. OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence works well if you know the syntax very well and you have experience in creating scripts or REXX syntax; it would be very good and is a good tool, but it takes time to learn, so that is for experienced staff to work with. I would rate the product a six from one to ten. I cannot think of any additional features in the next release of OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence.

Read full review

Akshita Kukreja

Assistant Manager at SMS group GmbH

Have integrated effective monitoring and seamless alerting with improved visualization capabilities

The most valuable feature of SCOM is its monitoring capability, and we have integrated SCOM with Grafana, which is a dashboarding tool. We have implemented and integrated this to create dashboarding of the SCOM monitoring system for the database, SQL, and the Linux servers we have configured in SCOM. We have created separate dashboarding for it, and the monitoring and creating rules and monitors in the management servers and management packs that SCOM provides are very useful for us. The alerting mechanism of SCOM has benefited our operations because we have modified the thresholds as per our internal requirements. We have configured threshold modifications for the CPU, memory, and especially for disk space. For routine disk space usage on the system, we have provided a separate threshold configuration.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It’s invaluable for expediting the shutdowns/IPLs of our z/OS LPARs and monitoring our z/OS LPARs for issues/problems."

"OPS/REXX is valuable because it allows us almost unlimited flexibility in automating our system."

"It's very flexible. You can customize what you need to, which is good. For example, you can do your own coding inside the tool, make your own scripting tooling."

"OPS/MVS is much more intuitive to use, especially compared to Netview/SA/GDPS."

"The documentation is simple, easy to follow, and use. A limited, first-time systems programmer can do it, in that it is out-of-the-box almost functional."

"It's very secure, because it's a legacy application."

"It is an easy product to use and it is stable."

"Their technical support is incredible, immediately responsive, and even if it is not updated to Level 2 support sometimes, they chip in providing more detailed answers and options to fix the problem."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence pros

"The good reporting capabilities was one of the major functions which made us choose SCOM as the tool for handling MS application operations (only used for that, not the OS platforms)."

"Does a great job with Microsoft technologies."

"The System Center 2012 R2 is really powerful, all products work great together, is not so expensive anymore, easy to license, and can cover from end to end (Networking, Hardware layer, OS, App and services, ports, etc.)."

"ROI turned out to be pretty good since we had good centralized monitoring for our whole data center and all the outages were quickly escalated from the Command center to the relevant Team."

"This solution satisfies all of the requirements that we need for our Windows-based systems, so if you are using the Windows platform then this is an easy solution."

"I like the historical reporting of observer metrics, and it's a fairly user-friendly solution."

"This solution saves us a lot of work because it reduces the effort that is required in order to start monitoring."

"It discovers the components automatically, which is a fantastic thing."

More SCOM pros

Cons

"My impressions on OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence is that it's quite difficult to use, as it relies mainly on the coding syntax and doesn't provide an easy-to-use GUI."

"One thing that comes to mind is the MQ interface. The last time we tried to use it, it seemed a little clunky."

"SSM - when OPSMVS is started, there is a choice of either assuming all microhooks are up or all are down and working from there. It would be better if there was a feature that could discover the true state of every microhook."

"One of the things we've been wanting to do is to be able to automate off of different highlighted messages without actually knowing what the message is."

"The mainframe TSO side still displays green screens."

"The interfaces to USS, CA UIM could be better."

"We're missing the boat. We don't have a graphical display and we need something beyond just pretty PC pictures for the other departments."

"It was a complex setup in the mainframe environment."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence cons

"I would like to see them improve their network monitoring."

"It lacks certain details that other products do better, like granular access and better application monitoring."

"Overall, support is not great but it's not bad."

"SCOM is not as straightforward in terms of user interface or general experience, which could be improved."

"They can focus more on cloud monitoring instead of on-premise monitoring. We should be able to monitor cloud-related applications."

"We didn't know the solution enough, and therefore, it took a while to set everything up correctly."

"Even though I think there are ways that this product is superior to most other solutions on the market, there are quite a few things that it does not do alone."

"The price could be improved."

More SCOM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We have an enterprise agreement that includes this product as part of it."

"SCOM's pricing is average."

"The pricing is good, and it's part of their system center suite."

"Our Enterprise Agreement includes the price."

"There is a license needed to use this solution and it is paid annually."

"We have an EA with Microsoft, and it comes as part of the EA."

"We have to pay for a license and the price is fine for us."

"If you have a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement, then this is part of the agreement."

More SCOM pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

892,487 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Logistics Company

Educational Organization

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	25

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	54

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence?

My impressions on OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence is that it's quite difficult to use, as it relies mainly on the coding syntax and doesn't provide an easy-to-use GUI. OPS_MVS should have an easy-t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence?

We use the auto-purge transaction for some transactions that run very long, and we also use automation to open and close files in CICS as well.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence?

See all answers

What do you like most about SCOM?

The tool helps to monitor Windows servers. It offers alerts from a central location.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SCOM?

I am not aware of the exact pricing as it is managed by my supervisor. As an academic institution, we receive substantial discounts.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SCOM?

We believe that the dashboarding in SCOM needs to be improved or enhanced because it is not too expressive in reporting. We can work on deploying new ways of viewing things and modifying visualizat...

See all answers

Comparisons

BMC AMI Ops vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 14% of the time

IBM OMEGAMON vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 12% of the time

IBM Tivoli Business Service Manager vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 10% of the time

Tone Mainframe Management vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 5% of the time

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Competitors

Nagios XI vs SCOM

Compared 6% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs SCOM

Compared 6% of the time

Zabbix vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

LogicMonitor vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

More SCOM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

April 2026

Download OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence product report

Buyer's Guide

SCOM

April 2026

Download SCOM product report

Also Known As

CA OPS MVS Event Management and Automation, CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation, Unicenter CA-OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation

System Center Operations Manager, SCOM 2012

Overview

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is designed for effective mainframe automation with flexibility and user convenience, offering tools for synchronized operations and comprehensive platform automation.

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence provides robust automation features that streamline mainframe operations, enhancing task synchronization and minimizing manual interventions. Its adaptability across multiple platforms, integration capabilities, and support for ad hoc operations ensure an efficient automation environment. However, users identify potential improvements in setup, third-party compatibility, graphical interfaces, and documentation. While it serves diverse automation needs, enhancing web interfaces and API accessibility could further improve user experience.

What are the key features of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence?

Automatic IPL and Shutdown: Ensures orderly system startups and shutdowns.
System State Manager: Offers synchronized task operations for consistent system states.
OPSLOG: Enables message filtering to streamline communications.
Global Variables: Facilitates script customization and variable management.
OPS/REXX Support: Supports ad hoc operations for versatility in automation tasks.

What benefits and ROI can organizations expect?

Labor Minimization: Reduces manual task handling through automation.
Comprehensive Integration: Seamless connection with legacy applications for smooth operations.
Resource Control: Efficient management of resources across LPARs.
Enhanced Workflow Management: Improved automation of time-critical functions.

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is widely deployed in industries requiring high-level automation for mainframe environments. Organizations benefit from its capabilities in message suppression, system activity monitoring, startup and shutdown management, and resource control. Its efficient automation helps in inventory control and ensures seamless function integrations within diverse operational settings.

Broadcom

SCOM monitors Microsoft environments with a focus on Windows servers and applications such as SQL, Exchange, and SharePoint. It offers integration with Active Directory and Azure, along with customizable dashboards, management packs, and robust alert mechanisms, aiding efficient management and control.

SCOM provides a comprehensive monitoring solution for Microsoft technologies, helping organizations track performance and availability of applications, services, and infrastructure. It integrates with Active Directory and Azure, offering capabilities for monitoring Windows and Linux environments. Extensive management packs, customizable dashboards, and automated alerts offer a refined monitoring experience. Users benefit from detailed performance data, network monitoring, and auto-discovery features, enhancing operational insights and server management efficiency.

What are key features of SCOM?

Microsoft Environment Monitoring: Specialized for Windows servers and applications such as SQL, Exchange, and SharePoint.
Integration Capabilities: Seamless integration with Active Directory and Azure for streamlined operations.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailor visual data displays to enhance monitoring and decision-making.
Extensive Management Packs: Broad range of management packs for enhanced resource and application control.
Robust Alert Mechanisms: Comprehensive alerting to maintain service stability and address potential issues promptly.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Enhanced management of server applications and infrastructure.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Detailed insights into performance and service availability.
Proactive Issue Notification: Timely alerts for quick issue resolution.
Improved Control: More efficient server management through automation and visibility.

In technology sectors, SCOM is widely implemented for its ability to monitor server applications and infrastructure components. Healthcare and finance utilize its monitoring and alert systems for compliance and uptime. Enterprises integrate SCOM for managing complex systems like Exchange, SharePoint, and Active Directory, enabling comprehensive analytics and reporting.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Tieto

Dialog Telekom

Buyer's Guide

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. SCOM

April 2026

Free Report: OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. SCOM

Find out what your peers are saying about OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. SCOM and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

892,487 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. SCOM report.

See our list of best Event Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.