

Operating in the identity management and data governance category, Okta Platform and Skyhigh Security offer distinct advantages. Okta leads in responsive support and seamless identity integration, while Skyhigh is superior in data loss prevention and detailed analytics.
Features: Okta Platform includes Universal Directory for consistent identity management, single sign-on for easy access across applications, and adaptive MFA for secure authentication. Skyhigh Security provides robust tools for shadow IT assessment, cloud risk visibility, and data breach protection with detailed analytics.
Room for Improvement: Okta could enhance operational UX related to push notifications and SIEM integration, and streamline policy management and certificate rotations. Skyhigh Security might improve the user interface, custom application integration, and scalability, and provide comprehensive training resources.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Okta Platform offers flexible deployments via Public and Hybrid Cloud, noted for its responsive support across tiers, while Skyhigh's Hybrid and On-premises options offer significant support, though its management interface can be improved. Both are recognized for quality customer service but Okta typically scores higher in responsiveness.
Pricing and ROI: Okta Platform, though sometimes seen as costly by SMBs, offers competitive pricing with strong ROI through centralization and automation. Skyhigh Security, perceived as expensive, delivers ROI by reducing data risks and offering detailed cloud analytics, with both platforms necessitating careful licensing cost considerations.
Employee onboarding used to be a major pain point, but the automation Okta Platform provides for creating user accounts across various apps or SaaS tools has made our life much easier.
First, it improves the security authentication and authorization processes across the organization, securing applications with single sign-on and MFA.
We have our dashboard to log in via Okta Workforce Identity.
With Skyhigh Security, that same analysis could often be reduced to around ten minutes
By moving to having more in the cloud, their cloud is automatically updated as part of a SaaS solution, which reduces the responsibility on the company to do the updates themselves.
I have seen a return on investment from using Skyhigh Security; we saved a lot of time since the dashboard gives the complete picture of the overall usage of cloud apps.
By offering a system to set varying priority levels on support tickets, urgent issues could receive quicker attention, benefiting business continuity and customer satisfaction.
For Okta Platform, the customer service is seamless, and I am very satisfied with their assistance compared to other channels such as Microsoft's, which usually takes longer to resolve issues.
You can raise issues based on urgency using classifications such as P1, P2, P3, and P4, and you will receive a response within two hours for P1 and within four hours for P2.
We can know the case severity such as P1, P2, or P3, allowing easy interaction from the customer support side.
Weekly setup calls are conducted with all clients to discuss ongoing issues and resolutions.
There is also some really good diagnostic information built into their web gateways that they deploy on-premise if you want to do hybrid, so they get a lot of information before you even know something might be wrong.
The scalability of Okta Platform is impressive, but its effectiveness relies on how integrations are designed, rate limits are handled, and day-to-day operations are managed.
It is secure, providing needed scalability without impacting performance.
Clients can scale their API access requests beyond default limits, which is adaptable according to requirements without impacting performance or deployment.
Scalability-wise, for monitoring cloud apps, Skyhigh Security is more scalable, and we never faced any scalability issues on the dashboards.
They have peering agreements with a lot of the major ISPs where their data centers are, which allows them to get a really good bandwidth allocation.
We upgraded with a plan for the next five to seven years to run with this solution because this easy scalability is what we are able to achieve with Skyhigh Security for our environment.
This ensures immediate action upon changes applied within Okta Platform, stabilizing operations in managing user accounts, identities, logins, and user profiles.
You do not need to think about performance with Okta Platform; it just works.
Okta Workforce Identity is a stable product.
We did not face any downtime on that site, so it is quite reliable.
If your primary location is down, you just get diverted to the other one.
It has many gaps, so I think some customers take three months and up to six months for the deployment of Skyhigh Security.
If there was a fingerprint option, then only the person who has already added their fingerprint on their mobile phone could access it.
If someone is a beginner with Okta Platform, the UI should be simplified, and the language used should make it easier for them to understand the concepts and what they are trying to do.
While they have a vast range of integrations out of the box available, if their PAM and IGA capabilities were more mature, then Okta Platform could be the single solution for everything, covering access management, privilege access management, and governance of identity.
There is no API available.
Skyhigh Security does not have a local representative in the Philippines.
Skyhigh has its own DLP which is helping users not upload sensitive documents to the AI chatbot, making that a main good feature.
Despite the cost, it's cheaper than the potential financial loss from a security breach.
It is certainly not cheap, but the features that you get, the functionality that you get, and whatever use cases that you have, it definitely satisfies those.
The pricing per-user list drops when user counts rise and with multi-year commitments.
After switching, cost savings would be in the millions since we were having many VPN edge routers, and there were many VPN tunnels utilized on the cloud, and after moving to ZTNA, we were able to cut the cost.
The pricing and licensing was generally aligned with the number of users and the models, and the cost depends on the scope, but I think Skyhigh Security has great pricing for the market.
Regarding pricing, the licensing and pricing for Skyhigh Security, especially for SWG, is cheap.
One of its most valuable features is its easy integration with various applications through its extensive application directory, offering hundreds or thousands of applications ready to configure.
It offers around eight thousand five hundred out-of-the-box connectors, providing an edge over other tools.
For the end user, it is beneficial as they do not have to remember a password or keep the password on a post-it for different applications; they just authenticate once to access several services and service providers.
Skyhigh Security dashboard helps monitor security threats, and it works well with very large enterprise environments.
By going through their Zero Trust interface, we effectively had single sign-on to the internal network remotely without a VPN, so it reduced the overhead and gave us faster access to the files.
The hardware and cloud usability features help my team by providing easy scalability, which is the main advantage.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Okta Platform | 4.7% |
| Skyhigh Security | 2.5% |
| Other | 92.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 52 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 27 |
| Large Enterprise | 63 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 34 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 49 |
Okta Platform provides comprehensive identity and access management, featuring Active Directory Sync, user management, and app auto-provisioning. It ensures security through single sign-on and adaptive multi-factor authentication.
Okta Platform offers advanced integration capabilities, allowing seamless connection with in-house and cloud applications. Security features are robust, incorporating multi-factor authentication and SSO to prevent unauthorized access. Users benefit from its ease of use and the ability to integrate and manage numerous applications effectively. While generally praised, users note areas for improvement, such as high costs and complex setups. Better integrations with on-premises systems and third-party tools are desired along with enhanced error logging and reporting features.
What are Okta's key features?Companies across industries implement Okta to secure user authentication and streamline onboarding processes. It supports access management for both on-premises and cloud applications, synchronizing directories and facilitating SaaS services. Organizations benefit from reduced credential management complexity and improved IT infrastructure compliance.
Skyhigh Security provides comprehensive protection with features like user behavior analytics, shadow IT identification, and data loss prevention. Its integration with IT infrastructure offers robust security insights and helps maintain compliance.
Skyhigh Security offers a user-friendly interface that simplifies navigation while delivering substantial threat protection. It enhances existing IT infrastructure integration, such as DLP and Active Directory, to strengthen security. Yet, there is room for improvement in report generation speed, interface intuitiveness, and integration with other products. Organizations utilize Skyhigh Security to audit internet behavior, secure cloud environments and control web content. It effectively manages data movement and ensures compliance, while preventing unauthorized access and bandwidth misuse.
What are the key features of Skyhigh Security?In sectors like finance, healthcare, and technology, companies implement Skyhigh Security for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities. It helps secure access to SaaS applications and protects against threats, ensuring adherence to regulatory requirements and preventing data breaches while optimizing performance in cloud environments.
We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.